IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v73y1998i1p76-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cognitive Evaluation of Frame-of-Reference Rater Training: Content and Process Issues,

Author

Listed:
  • Schleicher, Deidra J.
  • Day, David V.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Schleicher, Deidra J. & Day, David V., 1998. "A Cognitive Evaluation of Frame-of-Reference Rater Training: Content and Process Issues, ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 76-101, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:73:y:1998:i:1:p:76-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749-5978(98)92751-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borman, Walter C., 1987. "Personal constructs, performance schemata, and "folk theories" of subordinate effectiveness: Explorations in an army officer sample," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 307-322, December.
    2. Ilgen, Daniel R. & Barnes-Farrell, Janet L. & McKellin, David B., 1993. "Performance Appraisal Process Research in the 1980s: What Has It Contributed to Appraisals in Use?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 321-368, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Rosales Sánchez & Dolores Díaz-Cabrera & Estefanía Hernández-Fernaud, 2019. "Does effectiveness in performance appraisal improve with rater training?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Baltes, Boris B. & Parker, Christopher P., 2000. "Reducing the Effects of Performance Expectations on Behavioral Ratings," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 237-267, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary F. Gebhardt & François A. Carrillat & Robert J. Riggle & William B. Locander, 2020. "A Market-Based Procedure for Assessing and Improving Content Validity," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 7(1), pages 19-41, June.
    2. Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., 2003. "Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 287-318.
    3. DeVoe, Sanford E. & Iyengar, Sheena S., 2004. "Managers' theories of subordinates: A cross-cultural examination of manager perceptions of motivation and appraisal of performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 47-61, January.
    4. Roch, Sylvia G., 2007. "Why convene rater teams: An investigation of the benefits of anticipated discussion, consensus, and rater motivation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 14-29, September.
    5. Peter Cappelli & Martin J. Conyon, 2018. "What Do Performance Appraisals Do?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 71(1), pages 88-116, January.
    6. Horowitz, I. & Zappe, C., 1995. "The linear programming alternative to policy capturing for eliciting criteria weights in the performance appraisal process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 667-676, December.
    7. van Gils, S. & van Quaquebeke, N. & van Knippenberg, D.L., 2009. "The X-Factor: On the Relevance of Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories for Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Agreement," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-055-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Wong-On-Wing, Bernard & Guo, Lan & Li, Wei & Yang, Dan, 2007. "Reducing conflict in balanced scorecard evaluations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 363-377.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:73:y:1998:i:1:p:76-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.