IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v184y2024ics074959782400030x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural tightness in organizations: Investigating the impact of formal and informal cultural tightness on employee creativity

Author

Listed:
  • Chua, Roy
  • Zhao, Na
  • Han, Meng

Abstract

This paper delineates cultural tightness into formal versus informal aspects to depict the strength of norms and the extent of sanctions emanating from both formal and informal norms. Organizations with high formal cultural tightness regulate behaviors through explicit written norms and official sanctions, whereas those with high informal cultural tightness regulate behaviors through uncodified norms, collective beliefs, and informal social sanctions. Through a field study across 14 diverse companies in two countries (Malaysia and the Philippines) and two experiments involving participants from the United States, we found that perceived informal cultural tightness consistently exerts a more significant impact on stifling employee creativity than perceived formal cultural tightness. Additionally, we discovered that these two aspects of cultural tightness also potentially interact to influence employee creativity. Lastly, we identified promotion-focused (but not prevention-focused) self-regulation as a likely mechanism through which informal cultural tightness affects employee creativity. These findings contribute to cultural tightness-looseness theory and research on how organizational culture affects employee creativity.

Suggested Citation

  • Chua, Roy & Zhao, Na & Han, Meng, 2024. "Cultural tightness in organizations: Investigating the impact of formal and informal cultural tightness on employee creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s074959782400030x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074959782400030X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:184:y:2024:i:c:s074959782400030x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.