IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v46y2016icp207-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debunking the psychometric properties of the LS\CMI: An application of item response theory with a risk assessment instrument

Author

Listed:
  • Giguère, Guy
  • Lussier, Patrick

Abstract

Andrews, Bonta, and Wormith (2004) presented the LS\CMI as a fourth-generation instrument designed for the assessment of risk and needs of adults in custody. Now widely used, prior research has focused mainly on the examination of the predictive validity of the overall score provided by the instrument. In practice, however, parole/probation officer rely of the LS\CMI items for case planning and case management purposes. Yet, the psychometric properties of these items are not well known. The current study, therefore, aimed to investigate the internal structure of the LS\CMI using item response theory (IRT).

Suggested Citation

  • Giguère, Guy & Lussier, Patrick, 2016. "Debunking the psychometric properties of the LS\CMI: An application of item response theory with a risk assessment instrument," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 207-218.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:46:y:2016:i:c:p:207-218
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.05.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235216300393
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.05.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoffman, Peter B., 1994. "Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States parole commission's salient factor score," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 477-494.
    2. Morgan, Robert D. & Kroner, Daryl G. & Mills, Jeremy F. & Serna, Catherine & McDonald, Brendan, 2013. "Dynamic risk assessment: A validation study," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 115-124.
    3. Hoffman, Peter B. & Beck, James L., 1976. "Salient factor score validation--A 1972 release cohort," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 69-76.
    4. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Lussier, Patrick & Gress, Carmen L.Z., 2014. "Community re-entry and the path toward desistance: A quasi-experimental longitudinal study of dynamic factors and community risk management of adult sex offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 111-122.
    6. Flores, Anthony W. & Lowenkamp, Christopher T. & Holsinger, Alexander M. & Latessa, Edward J., 2006. "Predicting outcome with the Level of Service Inventory-Revised: The importance of implementation integrity," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 523-529.
    7. Caudy, Michael S. & Durso, Joseph M. & Taxman, Faye S., 2013. "How well do dynamic needs predict recidivism? Implications for risk assessment and risk reduction," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 458-466.
    8. Mulvey, Edward P. & Schubert, Carol A. & Pitzer, Lindsey & Hawes, Samuel & Piquero, Alex & Cardwell, Stephanie, 2016. "An examination of change in dynamic risk of offending over time among serious juvenile offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 48-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lussier, Patrick & Frechette, Julien, 2022. "Community reentry and the revolving door problem: Are individuals convicted of sexual offenses adequately prepared?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Drawve, Grant & McNeeley, Susan, 2021. "Recidivism and community context: Integrating the environmental backcloth," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janssen-de Ruijter, E.A.W. & Mulder, E.A. & Bongers, I.L. & Vermunt, J.K. & van Nieuwenhuizen, Ch., 2021. "One is not the other: Predicting offending after discharge from secure residential care of male adolescents with four risk profiles," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Rahman, Shaikh Moksadur, 2020. "Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Business Review, Asian Business Consortium, vol. 10(2), pages 99-108.
    3. Naveena Prakasam & Louisa Huxtable-Thomas, 2021. "Reddit: Affordances as an Enabler for Shifting Loyalties," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 723-751, June.
    4. Valeriy Makarov & Albert Bakhtizin, 2014. "The Estimation Of The Regions’ Efficiency Of The Russian Federation Including The Intellectual Capital, The Characteristics Of Readiness For Innovation, Level Of Well-Being, And Quality Of Life," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 9-30.
    5. Kristine Edgar Danielyan & Samvel Grigoriy Chailyan, 2019. "Delineation of Effectors Impact on The Human Brain Derived Phosphoribosylpyrophosphate Synthetase-1 Activity," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 24(1), pages 17918-17926, December.
    6. Chuan Wang & Yupeng Liu & Wen Hou & Chao Yu & Guorong Wang & Yuyan Zheng, 2021. "Reliability and availability modeling of Subsea Autonomous High Integrity Pressure Protection System with partial stroke test by Dynamic Bayesian," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 268-281, April.
    7. Sana Sadiq & Khadija Anasse & Najib Slimani, 2022. "The impact of mobile phones on high school students: connecting the research dots," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 252-270, April.
    8. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2019. "The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 661-679, December.
    9. Martins, José & Costa, Catarina & Oliveira, Tiago & Gonçalves, Ramiro & Branco, Frederico, 2019. "How smartphone advertising influences consumers' purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 378-387.
    10. Wu, Bing & Yip, Tsz Leung & Yan, Xinping & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Bilgihan, Anil & Barreda, Albert & Okumus, Fevzi & Nusair, Khaldoon, 2016. "Consumer perception of knowledge-sharing in travel-related Online Social Networks," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 287-296.
    13. Géraldine Boué & Enda Cummins & Sandrine Guillou & Jean‐Philippe Antignac & Bruno Le Bizec & Jeanne‐Marie Membré, 2017. "Development and Application of a Probabilistic Risk–Benefit Assessment Model for Infant Feeding Integrating Microbiological, Nutritional, and Chemical Components," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2360-2388, December.
    14. Leila Tavakoli & Hamed Zamani & Falk Scholer & William Bruce Croft & Mark Sanderson, 2022. "Analyzing clarification in asynchronous information‐seeking conversations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 449-471, March.
    15. Chiara Francalanci & Ajaz Hussain, 2016. "Discovering social influencers with network visualization: evidence from the tourism domain," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 103-125, March.
    16. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    17. van Weeghel, H.J.E. & Bos, A.P. & Jansen, M.H. & Ursinus, W.W. & Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G., 2021. "Good animal welfare by design: An approach to incorporate animal capacities in engineering design," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Cocoradă, Elena & Maican, Cătălin Ioan & Cazan, Ana-Maria & Maican, Maria Anca, 2018. "Assessing the smartphone addiction risk and its associations with personality traits among adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 345-354.
    19. Óscar Chiva-Bartoll & Honorato Morente-Oria & Francisco Tomás González-Fernández & Pedro Jesús Ruiz-Montero, 2020. "Anxiety and Bodily Pain in Older Women Participants in a Physical Education Program. A Multiple Moderated Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, May.
    20. George Momanyi & Maureen Adoyo & Eunice Mwangi & Dennis Mokua, 2017. "Strengthening Strategic Reward Framework in Health Systems: A Survey of Narok County, Kenya," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 181-181, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:46:y:2016:i:c:p:207-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.