IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v186y2025ics0148296324005174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When compensatory consumption backfires: The asymmetric effect of self-threat on consumption preference and satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Mo, Zichuan
  • Ma, Jingjing
  • Hamilton, Ryan
  • Zhao, Yuanjie

Abstract

Compensatory consumption behaviors occur when a threat to one’s self-concept is followed by the choice of goods and experiences intended to bolster the self against the threat. While the shift in preferences is well documented, how satisfied consumers are with the chosen compensatory option remains an open question. This research identifies when and why compensatory consumption is likely to backfire (i.e., a self-threat that increases consumers’ preferences for a compensatory option at the choice stage can decrease their subsequent satisfaction with that option at the consumption stage). We find that within-domain compensatory consumption (e.g., buying something that makes one feel smart after a threat to one’s intelligence) is more likely to backfire compared to cross-domain compensatory compensation (e.g., buying something that makes one feel beautiful after a threat to one’s intelligence). Rumination on the threat at the consumption stage is identified as the underlying mechanism for this backfire effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Mo, Zichuan & Ma, Jingjing & Hamilton, Ryan & Zhao, Yuanjie, 2025. "When compensatory consumption backfires: The asymmetric effect of self-threat on consumption preference and satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:186:y:2025:i:c:s0148296324005174
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324005174
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:186:y:2025:i:c:s0148296324005174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.