IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/doi10.1086-678902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perils of Compensatory Consumption: Within-Domain Compensation Undermines Subsequent Self-Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Lisjak
  • Andrea Bonezzi
  • Soo Kim
  • Derek D. Rucker

Abstract

Prior research has shown that psychological threat can provoke consumers to desire, seek out, and acquire products that symbolize accomplishment in the domain of the threat. Although such within-domain compensation can serve as a psychological salve to repair the self, the current research suggests that sometimes this form of compensation can have ill effects. Specifically, engaging in within-domain compensation can trigger ruminative thinking about the threat. As a consequence, performance in subsequent tasks that require self-regulation is undermined. In support of this hypothesis, multiple experiments demonstrate that within-domain compensation impairs subsequent self-regulation on behaviors ranging from resisting tempting but unhealthy food to performing cognitively taxing tasks. Evidence that within-domain compensation fosters ruminative thought, as well as documentation of boundary conditions, is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Lisjak & Andrea Bonezzi & Soo Kim & Derek D. Rucker, 2015. "Perils of Compensatory Consumption: Within-Domain Compensation Undermines Subsequent Self-Regulation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(5), pages 1186-1203.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/678902
    DOI: 10.1086/678902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/678902
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/678902
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/678902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexopoulos, Theodore & Šimleša, Milija & Francis, Mélanie, 2015. "Good self, bad self: Initial success and failure moderate the endowment effect," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 32-40.
    2. Orazi, Davide C. & Yi Mah, Kit & Derksen, Tim & Murray, Kyle B., 2023. "Consumer escapism: Scale development, validation, and physiological associations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Freeman Wu & Adriana Samper & Andrea C. Morales & Gavan J. Fitzsimons, 2017. "It’s Too Pretty to Use! When and How Enhanced Product Aesthetics Discourage Usage and Lower Consumption Enjoyment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 651-672.
    4. Zheng, Xiaoying & Xu, Jing & Shen, Hao, 2022. "To be respected or liked: The influence of social comparisons on consumer preference for competence- versus warmth-oriented products," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 170-189.
    5. Billore, Soniya & Anisimova, Tatiana & Vrontis, Demetris, 2023. "Self-regulation and goal-directed behavior: A systematic literature review, public policy recommendations, and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Sheng Bi & Jun Pang & Huan Chen & Andrew Perkins, 2024. "When feeling powerless, we crave nostalgia: The impact of powerlessness on the preference for nostalgic products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 998-1017, July.
    7. Wang, Yaming & Wang, Xingyuan & Chen, Haipeng (Allan) & Ouyang, Qiang, 2024. "Effect of status threat on preference for cross-domain self-improvement products: The moderation of trade-off beliefs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/678902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.