IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v148y2022icp444-455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder identification and prioritization: The attribute of dependency

Author

Listed:
  • Rodriguez Serna, Lil
  • Nakandala, Dilupa
  • Bowyer, Dorothea

Abstract

Stakeholder identification literature states that stakeholders with power, legitimacy and urgency over an organization should be prioritized. But, how can stakeholders be identified and prioritized when they lack awareness of organizational strategies? Unawareness, evident in internal issues, results in some stakeholders not having urgent claims and thus not considered priority stakeholders. To fill this gap, we draw on Resource-Dependency theory to introduce the operational attribute of resource-dependency. Our theorization is explored in the context of business succession in family businesses (FB). We examined and compared owners' views, against other stakeholder groups deemed, by them, important for the success of their organization. We used a multiple-case study design to study six Australian food manufacturing FBs. We found that stakeholder identification and prioritization accuracy improve when driven by the nature of the managerial issue (i.e., succession over market expansion) and the analysis of the organization’s levels of dependency on key individual stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodriguez Serna, Lil & Nakandala, Dilupa & Bowyer, Dorothea, 2022. "Stakeholder identification and prioritization: The attribute of dependency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 444-455.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:148:y:2022:i:c:p:444-455
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322004088
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitchell, J. Robert & Israelsen, Trevor L. & Mitchell, Ronald K. & Lim, Dominic S.K., 2021. "Stakeholder identification as entrepreneurial action: The social process of stakeholder enrollment in new venture emergence," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    2. Grant Savage & Michele Bunn & Barbara Gray & Qian Xiao & Sijun Wang & Elizabeth Wilson & Eric Williams, 2010. "Stakeholder Collaboration: Implications for Stakeholder Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 21-26, August.
    3. Gamble, Jordan Robert & Clinton, Eric & Díaz-Moriana, Vanessa, 2021. "Broadening the business model construct: Exploring how family-owned SMEs co-create value with external stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 646-657.
    4. Mumin Dayan & Poh Yen Ng & Nelson Oly Ndubisi, 2019. "Mindfulness, socioemotional wealth, and environmental strategy of family businesses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 466-481, March.
    5. Gerardo Patriotta, 2003. "Sensemaking on the Shop Floor: Narratives of Knowledge in Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 349-375, March.
    6. Daniela Gimenez-Jimenez & Linda F. Edelman & Tommaso Minola & Andrea Calabrò & Lucio Cassia, 2021. "An Intergeneration Solidarity Perspective on Succession Intentions in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 740-766, July.
    7. Jess H. Chua & James J. Chrisman & Pramodita Sharma, 1999. "Defining the Family Business by Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(4), pages 19-39, July.
    8. Nadine Kammerlander & Andreas König & Melanie Richards, 2018. "Why Do Incumbents Respond Heterogeneously to Disruptive Innovations? The Interplay of Domain Identity and Role Identity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1122-1165, November.
    9. H. Igor Ansoff, 1980. "Strategic issue management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 131-148, April.
    10. Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom, 2011. "Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 77-87, March.
    11. Morgane M.C. Fritz & Romana Rauter & Rupert Baumgartner & Nikolay Dentchev, 2018. "A supply chain perspective of stakeholder identification as a tool for responsible policy and decision-making," Post-Print hal-02547267, HAL.
    12. Alain Verbeke & Vincent Tung, 2013. "The Future of Stakeholder Management Theory: A Temporal Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 529-543, February.
    13. Randerson, Kathleen, 2022. "Conceptualizing family business social responsibility," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Liu, Fangyi, 2021. "Family business succession roadblock model based on fuzzy linguistic preference relations," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    15. Mitchell, Ronald K. & Agle, Bradley R. & Chrisman, James J. & Spence, Laura J., 2011. "Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Salience in Family Firms1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 235-255, April.
    16. Sharma, Pramodita & Chrisman, James J. & Chua, Jess H., 2003. "Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 667-687, September.
    17. Per-Olof Bjuggren & Lars-Göran Sund, 2014. "A contractual perspective on succession in family firms: a stakeholder view," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 211-225, October.
    18. Albats, Ekaterina & Alexander, Allen & Mahdad, Maral & Miller, Kristel & Post, Ger, 2020. "Stakeholder management in SME open innovation: interdependences and strategic actions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 291-301.
    19. Richard A. Wolfe & Daniel S. Putler, 2002. "How Tight Are the Ties that Bind Stakeholder Groups?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 64-80, February.
    20. Annalisa Prencipe & Sasson Bar-Yosef & Henri C. Dekker, 2014. "Accounting Research in Family Firms: Theoretical and Empirical Challenges," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 361-385, September.
    21. Boris Rumanko & Zuzana Lušňáková & Monika Moravanská & Mária Šajbidorová, 2021. "Succession as a Risk Process in the Survival of a Family Business—Case of Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tribe, John & Paddison, Brendan, 2023. "Critical tourism strategy," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Nizar Abdelkafi & Jinou Xu & Margherita Pero & Federica Ciccullo & Antonio Masi, 2023. "Does the combination of sustainable business model patterns lead to truly sustainable business models? Critical analysis of existing frameworks and extensions," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 597-634, May.
    3. Ampofo, Sandra Asantewa & Yunfei, Shao & Opoku-Mensah, Evans & Effah, Derrick & Tuffour, Priscilla & Darko, Debora & Asiedu-Aryeh, Emelia, 2023. "Sustainable mining: Examining the direct and configuration path of legitimacy pressure, dual embeddedness resource dependency and green mining towards resource management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sallay, Viola & Wieszt, Attila & Varga, Szabolcs & Martos, Tamás, 2024. "Balancing identity, construction, and rules: Family relationship negotiations during first-generation succession in family businesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Randerson, Kathleen, 2022. "Conceptualizing family business social responsibility," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Van Gils, Anita & Huybrechts, Jolien & Minola, Tommaso & Cassia, Lucio, 2019. "Unraveling the impact of family antecedents on family firm image: A serial multiple-mediation model," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 17-27.
    4. Raj V. Mahto & Peter S. Davis & John A. Pearce II & Richard B. Robinson Jr., 2010. "Satisfaction with Firm Performance in Family Businesses," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(5), pages 985-1002, September.
    5. Peter Jaskiewicz & Katharina Heinrichs & Sabine B. Rau & Trish Reay, 2016. "To Be or Not to Be: How Family Firms Manage Family and Commercial Logics in Succession," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(4), pages 781-813, July.
    6. Simon C. Parker, 2016. "Family Firms and the “Willing Successor†Problem," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(6), pages 1241-1259, November.
    7. Umans, Ine & Lybaert, Nadine & Steijvers, Tensie & Voordeckers, Wim, 2021. "The influence of transgenerational succession intentions on the succession planning process: The moderating role of high-quality relationships," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2).
    8. Unai Arzubiaga & Manel Plana-Farran & Agnès Ros-Morente & Albert Joana & Sílvia Solé, 2021. "Mindfulness and Next-Generation Members of Family Firms: A Source for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Burton, Nicholas & Vu, Mai Chi & Cruz, Allan Discua, 2022. "Our social legacy will go on: Understanding outcomes of family SME succession through engaged Buddhism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 105-118.
    10. Elise Perrault, 2017. "A ‘Names-and-Faces Approach’ to Stakeholder Identification and Salience: A Matter of Status," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 25-38, November.
    11. Godlewski, Christophe J. & Le, Nhung Hong, 2022. "Family firms and the cost of borrowing: empirical evidence from East Asia," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Kowalik, Elena, 2023. "Ethical Problems in Family Firms," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(2), pages 431-452.
    13. Debicki, Bart J. & Ramírez-Solís, Edgar Rogelio & Baños-Monroy, Verónica Ilián & Gutiérrez-Patrón, Lilia Magali, 2020. "The impact of strategic focus on relational capital: A comparative study of family and non-family firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 585-598.
    14. Godlewski, Christophe J. & Nhung Le, Hong, 2024. "Family ties and firm performance empirical evidence from East Asia," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 150-166.
    15. Alexandra Bertschi-Michel & Nadine Kammerlander & Vanessa M. Strike, 2020. "Unearthing and Alleviating Emotions in Family Business Successions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(1), pages 81-108, January.
    16. Christine A. Riordan & Alexander M. Kowalski, 2021. "From Bread and Roses to #MeToo: Multiplicity, Distance, and the Changing Dynamics of Conflict in IR Theory," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 580-606, May.
    17. Patrick Raymund James M. Garcia & Pramodita Sharma & Alfredo De Massis & Mike Wright & Louise Scholes, 2019. "Perceived Parental Behaviors and Next-Generation Engagement in Family Firms: A Social Cognitive Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(2), pages 224-243, March.
    18. Paolo Toma & Stefano Montanari, 2017. "Corporate governance effectiveness along the entrepreneurial process of a family firm: the role of private equity," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(4), pages 1023-1052, December.
    19. Josiane Fahed-Sreih & Abdul-Nasser El-Kassar, 2017. "Strategic Planning, Performance And Innovative Capabilities Of Non-Family Members In Family Businesses," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-24, October.
    20. McGuire, Jean & Dow, Sandra & Ibrahim, Bakr, 2012. "All in the family? Social performance and corporate governance in the family firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1643-1650.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:148:y:2022:i:c:p:444-455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.