IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v110y2020icp538-553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agile, Stage-Gate and their combination: Exploring how they relate to performance in software development

Author

Listed:
  • Bianchi, Mattia
  • Marzi, Giacomo
  • Guerini, Massimiliano

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates the relationship of plan-driven Stage-Gate and flexible Agile models with new product development performance through an original conceptualization that focuses on their underlying principles for managing uncertainty and the resulting changes. While Stage-Gate attempts to control uncertainty up-front to avoid later changes, Agile seeks to adapt to uncertainty and accommodate changes for a longer proportion of the development process. In addition, we examine the interaction effects of combining the two models. The analysis of survey data on 181 software developers shows that the adoption of Stage-Gate principles is negatively associated with speed and cost performance. For Agile, the use of sprints is positively related to new product quality, on-time and on-budget completion, while early and frequent user feedback would seem to prolong time-to-market. Finally, the results highlight a nuanced interaction between Stage-Gate and Agile, both positive and negative depending on the principles considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianchi, Mattia & Marzi, Giacomo & Guerini, Massimiliano, 2020. "Agile, Stage-Gate and their combination: Exploring how they relate to performance in software development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 538-553.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:110:y:2020:i:c:p:538-553
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318302273
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franke, Nikolaus & Hippel, Eric von, 2003. "Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1199-1215, July.
    2. Jacob Lyngsie & Nicolai J. Foss, 2017. "The more, the merrier? Women in top‐management teams and entrepreneurship in established firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 487-505, March.
    3. Sylvain Lenfle & Christoph Loch, 2010. "Lost Roots: How Project Management Came to Emphasize Control Over Flexibility and Novelty," Post-Print hal-00557549, HAL.
    4. Addis Gedefaw Birhanu & Alfonso Gambardella & Giovanni Valentini, 2016. "Bribery and Investment : Firm-Level Evidence from Africa and Latin America," Post-Print hal-02313335, HAL.
    5. Addis G. Birhanu & Alfonso Gambardella & Giovanni Valentini, 2016. "Bribery and investment: Firm-level evidence from Africa and Latin America," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1865-1877, September.
    6. Sarma Nidumolu, 1995. "The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 191-219, September.
    7. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    8. Likoebe M. Maruping & Viswanath Venkatesh & Ritu Agarwal, 2009. "A Control Theory Perspective on Agile Methodology Use and Changing User Requirements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 377-399, September.
    9. Alexander Budzier & Bent Flyvbjerg, 2013. "Overspend? Late? Failure? What the Data Say About IT Project Risk in the Public Sector," Papers 1304.4525, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    10. Alan MacCormack & Roberto Verganti & Marco Iansiti, 2001. "Developing Products on "Internet Time": The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 133-150, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qin, Jian & van der Rhee, Bo & Venkataraman, Venugopal & Ahmadi, Taher, 2021. "The impact of IT infrastructure capability on NPD performance: The roles of market knowledge and innovation process formality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 252-264.
    2. Ambituuni, Ambisisi & Azizsafaei, Farzaneh & Keegan, Anne, 2021. "HRM operational models and practices to enable strategic agility in PBOs: Managing paradoxical tensions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 170-182.
    3. Wilson, Grant Alexander & Case, Tyler & Dobni, C. Brooke, 2023. "A global study of innovation-oriented firms: Dimensions, practices, and performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Baskaran Govindaras & Tuan Sau Wern & Sharangeet Kaur & Idris Akmal Haslin & R Kanesaraj Ramasamy, 2023. "Sustainable Environment to Prevent Burnout and Attrition in Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Mero, Joel & Leinonen, Miira & Makkonen, Hannu & Karjaluoto, Heikki, 2022. "Agile logic for SaaS implementation: Capitalizing on marketing automation software in a start-up," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 583-594.
    6. Paluch, Stefanie & Antons, David & Brettel, Malte & Hopp, Christian & Salge, Torsten-Oliver & Piller, Frank & Wentzel, Daniel, 2020. "Stage-gate and agile development in the digital age: Promises, perils, and boundary conditions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 495-501.
    7. Granato, Giulia & Fischer, Arnout R.H. & van Trijp, Hans C.M., 2022. "“Misalignments between users and designers as source of inspiration: A novel hybrid method for physical new product development”," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Sanasi, Silvia & Ghezzi, Antonio & Cavallo, Angelo, 2023. "What happens after market validation? Experimentation for scaling in technology-based startups," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Samuli Laato & Matti Mäntymäki & A. K.M. Najmul Islam & Sami Hyrynsalmi & Teemu Birkstedt, 2023. "Trends and Trajectories in the Software Industry: implications for the future of work," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 929-944, April.
    10. Gianpaolo Abatecola & Alberto Surace, 2020. "Discussing the Use of Complexity Theory in Engineering Management: Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Gamón-Sanz, Alejandro & Alegre, Joaquín & Chiva, Ricardo, 2024. "Industries, frameworks, and key drivers of lean startup: a systematic literature review," TEC Empresarial, School of Business, Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR), vol. 18(2), pages 51-80.
    12. Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko & Wincent, Joakim, 2020. "An agile co-creation process for digital servitization: A micro-service innovation approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 478-491.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Marcelo Pereira Duarte & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "A Perspective on Administrative Distance: Theoretical Development and Measurement," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    2. Dushnitsky, Gary & Yu, Lei, 2022. "Why do incumbents fund startups? A study of the antecedents of corporate venture capital in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    3. Wolfgang Sofka & Christoph Grimpe & Fuad Hasanov & Reda Cherif, 2022. "Additionality or opportunism: Do host-country R&D subsidies impact innovation in foreign MNC subsidiaries?," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 296-327, September.
    4. Stephen J. Smulowitz & Didier Cossin & Alfredo De Massis & Hongze (Abraham) Lu, 2023. "Wrongdoing in Publicly Listed Family- and Nonfamily-Owned Firms: A Behavioral Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1233-1264, July.
    5. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    6. Yu Yan & Shusen Qi, 2021. "I Know What I Need: Optimization of Bribery," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 311-332, November.
    7. Hailiang Zou & Yunfeng Lu & Guoyou Qi, 2023. "Does Pay Disparity within Top Management Teams Lead to Bribery Activity? The Moderation of Demographic Diversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Byung Il Park & Sungjin J. Hong & Shufeng Simon Xiao, 2022. "Institutional pressure and MNC compliance to prevent bribery: empirical examinations in South Korea and China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 623-656, September.
    9. Salman Nazir & Brad Price & Nanda C. Surendra & Katherine Kopp, 2022. "Adapting agile development practices for hyper-agile environments: lessons learned from a COVID-19 emergency response research project," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 193-211, September.
    10. Liuyang Ren & Xi Zhong & Liangyong Wan, 2022. "Defending the shell: differential effects of delisting pressure on R&D intensity and bribery expenditure," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1437-1470, July.
    11. Yung, Kenneth & Cai, Qiuye & Li, Deqing Diane, 2023. "Greasing the wheels of irreversible investment: International evidence on the economic effects of corruption," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Atif Açıkgöz & Ayşe Günsel & Nizamettin Bayyurt & Cemil Kuzey, 2014. "Team Climate, Team Cognition, Team Intuition, and Software Quality: The Moderating Role of Project Complexity," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1145-1176, September.
    13. Krishnaswamy N. & Selvarasu A., 2016. "Exploring interrelationship between three performance indicators with PMI’s Nine Knowledge Areas for successful Project Management," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 6(3), pages 1162-1162.
    14. Qi, Guoyou & Zou, Hailiang & Xie, Xuemei & Meng, Xiaohua & Fan, Tijun & Cao, Yuanhe, 2020. "Obedience or escape: Examining the contingency influences of corruption on firm exports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 261-272.
    15. Gonzalo Molina-Sieiro & Katia M. Galdino & R. Michael Holmes, 2023. "Ownership types, institutions, and the internationalization of emerging economy new ventures: evidence from Africa," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1121-1145, March.
    16. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Mario Le Glatin & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Designing Decisions In The Unknown: Towards A Generative Decision Model For Management Science," Post-Print hal-01937103, HAL.
    17. Wu, Yan & Yang, Yong & Mickiewicz, Tomasz, 2023. "Corruption, the digital sectors, and the profitability of foreign subsidiaries in emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Jeoung Yul Lee & Daekwan Kim & Byungchul Choi & Alfredo Jiménez, 2023. "Early evidence on how Industry 4.0 reshapes MNEs’ global value chains: The role of value creation versus value capturing by headquarters and foreign subsidiaries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(4), pages 599-630, June.
    19. Di Stefano, Giada & Gambardella, Alfonso & Verona, Gianmario, 2012. "Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1283-1295.
    20. Chengguang Li & Jeffrey J. Reuer, 2022. "The impact of corruption on market reactions to international strategic alliances," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 187-202, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:110:y:2020:i:c:p:538-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.