IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v107y2020icp302-314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents of locus of causality attributions for destructive acts in distribution channels

Author

Listed:
  • Eslami, Hadi
  • Kacker, Manish
  • Hibbard, Jonathan D.

Abstract

Destructive acts in distribution channels are actions by firms that have a significant adverse impact on the viability or functioning of channel members. Understanding an affected channel member's locus of causality attributions for a destructive act can help the initiating firm determine when, where and how to proactively mitigate the adverse consequences of the act. We incorporate insights from interdependence and attribution theories to develop a theoretical framework of antecedents of locus of causality for such acts. We empirically evaluate our hypotheses using survey data from key informants on both sides of supplier-retailer dyads for a Fortune 500 company. We find that interdependence structure, perceived intensity and perceived frequency of destructive acts have implications for causal attributions made by the affected firm (retailer). Further, we find evidence for the impact of relationship quality on causal attributions (including the role it plays in amplifying the effects of other antecedents).

Suggested Citation

  • Eslami, Hadi & Kacker, Manish & Hibbard, Jonathan D., 2020. "Antecedents of locus of causality attributions for destructive acts in distribution channels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 302-314.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:107:y:2020:i:c:p:302-314
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318306714
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jap, Sandy D. & Manolis, Chris & Weitz, Barton A., 1999. "Relationship Quality and Buyer-Seller Interactions in Channels of Distribution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 303-313, November.
    2. Kim, Stephen K. & Hibbard, Jonathan D. & Swain, Scott D., 2011. "Commitment in Marketing Channels: Mitigator or Aggravator of the Effects of Destructive Acts?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 521-539.
    3. Ganesan, Shankar & George, Morris & Jap, Sandy & Palmatier, Robert W. & Weitz, Barton, 2009. "Supply Chain Management and Retailer Performance: Emerging Trends, Issues, and Implications for Research and Practice," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 84-94.
    4. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    5. Watson, George F. & Worm, Stefan & Palmatier, Robert W. & Ganesan, Shankar, 2015. "The Evolution of Marketing Channels: Trends and Research Directions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 546-568.
    6. Selnes, Fred & Gonhaug, Kjell, 2000. "Effects of Supplier Reliability and Benevolence in Business Marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 259-271, September.
    7. Erin Anderson & Barton Weitz, 1989. "Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 310-323.
    8. Fuller, Christie M. & Simmering, Marcia J. & Atinc, Guclu & Atinc, Yasemin & Babin, Barry J., 2016. "Common methods variance detection in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3192-3198.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lyu, Chongchong & Yang, Jianjun & Zhang, Feng & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Mu, Tian, 2020. "How do knowledge characteristics affect firm’s knowledge sharing intention in interfirm cooperation? An empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 48-60.
    2. Thowayeb H. Hassan & Amany E. Salem & Mahmoud I. Saleh, 2022. "Digital-Free Tourism Holiday as a New Approach for Tourism Well-Being: Tourists’ Attributional Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Luse, Andy & Burkman, Jim, 2022. "Learned helplessness attributional scale (LHAS): Development and validation of an attributional style measure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 623-634.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Surajit Bag & Muhammad Sabbir Rahman & Susmi Routray & Santosh Kumar Shrivastav & Soni Agrawal, 2024. "Exploring the potential of blockchain‐enabled smart contracts for achieving net‐zero emissions: An empirical study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3965-3985, July.
    2. Rahman, Syed Mahmudur & Carlson, Jamie & Gudergan, Siegfried P. & Wetzels, Martin & Grewal, Dhruv, 2022. "Perceived Omnichannel Customer Experience (OCX): Concept, measurement, and impact," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 611-632.
    3. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Rajeev Dwivedi & Ronaldo Gomes Dultra-de-Lima & Claudio Parisi & José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari, 2023. "Role of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Information Systems for Achieving Strategic Flexibility through Decision-Making Performance: An Exploratory Study Based on North American and South American," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 199-218, June.
    4. Kakkar, Shiva & Vohra, Neharika, 2021. "Self-Regulatory Effects of Performance Management System Consistency on Employee Engagement: A Moderated Mediation Model," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 24(1), pages 225-248, May.
    5. Peter J Jordan & Ashlea C Troth, 2020. "Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(1), pages 3-14, February.
    6. Dash, Ganesh & Alharthi, Majed & Albarrak, Mansour & Aggarwal, Shalini, 2024. "Saudi millennials’ panic buying behavior during pandemic and post-pandemic: Role of social media addiction and religious values and commitment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Howard, Matt C. & Henderson, Jennifer, 2023. "A review of exploratory factor analysis in tourism and hospitality research: Identifying current practices and avenues for improvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Sakib, Md Nazmus & Hasan, Fuad & Al-Emran, Md & Felix, Reto, 2023. "A cross-cultural analysis of ridesharing intentions and compliance with COVID-19 health guidelines: The roles of social trust, fear of COVID-19, and trust-in-God," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Steven Day & Janet Godsell & Donato Masi & Wanrong Zhang, 2020. "Predicting consumer adoption of branded subscription services: A prospect theory perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1310-1330, March.
    10. Young K. Ro & Hung-Chung Su & Yi-Su Chen, 2016. "A Tale of Two Perspectives on an Impending Supply Disruption," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(1), pages 3-20, January.
    11. Sandra S. Graça, 2021. "A Global PSS Framework for Sustainable B2B Partnership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    12. Tripathi, Gaurav & Dave, Kartik, 2013. "Store format choice and relationship quality in apparel retail: A study of young and early-middle aged shoppers in New Delhi region," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 479-487.
    13. Alteren, Gro & Tudoran, Ana Alina, 2016. "Enhancing export performance: Betting on customer orientation, behavioral commitment, and communication," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 370-381.
    14. Krafft, Manfred & Goetz, Oliver & Mantrala, Murali & Sotgiu, Francesca & Tillmanns, Sebastian, 2015. "The Evolution of Marketing Channel Research Domains and Methodologies: An Integrative Review and Future Directions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 569-585.
    15. Abdul-Muhmin, Alhassan G., 2005. "Instrumental and interpersonal determinants of relationship satisfaction and commitment in industrial markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 619-628, May.
    16. Vos, F.G.S. & Van der Lelij, R. & Schiele, H. & Praas, N.H.J., 2021. "Mediating the impact of power on supplier satisfaction: Do buyer status and relational conflict matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    17. Vijay Kumar Jain & Anu Gupta & Hemraj Verma, 2024. "Goodbye materialism: exploring antecedents of minimalism and its impact on millennials well-being," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19779-19805, August.
    18. Dubey, Vivek K. & Matthes, Joseph M. & Saini, Amit, 2023. "Impact of socioeconomic values collaboration on performance in franchising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Raja Sankaran & Shibashish Chakraborty, 2021. "Factors Impacting Mobile Banking in India: Empirical Approach Extending UTAUT2 with Perceived Value and Trust," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 7-24, January.
    20. Manit Mishra, 2016. "Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) as an Analytical Technique to Assess Measurement Error in Survey Research," Paradigm, , vol. 20(2), pages 97-112, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:107:y:2020:i:c:p:302-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.