IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v151y2022icp623-634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learned helplessness attributional scale (LHAS): Development and validation of an attributional style measure

Author

Listed:
  • Luse, Andy
  • Burkman, Jim

Abstract

Research illustrates that attribution theory holds untapped potential for researching problems in management and social science. This potential exists partly due to the lack of a concise measurement instrument. Previous measures, though suitable for their respective tasks, each come with a set of limitations. We suggest that one of these limitations, namely psychometric issues, may be a factor inhibiting use of attribution theory in the business domain. In answer to the call to increase the use of attribution theory we create a new set of scales to provide a stable, parsimonious instrument for measuring attribution style. Twelve sections of four courses across ten semesters were used to develop the scales and test them across groups and time. The final result is a new measurement tool, the Learned Helplessness Attribution Scale (LHAS), that demonstrates solid psychometric properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Luse, Andy & Burkman, Jim, 2022. "Learned helplessness attributional scale (LHAS): Development and validation of an attributional style measure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 623-634.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:151:y:2022:i:c:p:623-634
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322006105
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eslami, Hadi & Kacker, Manish & Hibbard, Jonathan D., 2020. "Antecedents of locus of causality attributions for destructive acts in distribution channels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 302-314.
    2. Piha, Lamprini & Papadas, Karolos & Davvetas, Vasileios, 2021. "Brand orientation: Conceptual extension, scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 203-222.
    3. Merz, Michael A. & Zarantonello, Lia & Grappi, Silvia, 2018. "How valuable are your customers in the brand value co-creation process? The development of a Customer Co-Creation Value (CCCV) scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 79-89.
    4. Aiken, Kirk Damon & Bee, Colleen & Walker, Nefertiti, 2018. "From passion to obsession: Development and validation of a scale to measure compulsive sport consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 69-79.
    5. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Baumgartner, Hans, 1998. "Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(1), pages 78-90, June.
    6. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    7. Jahanvi, Jahanvi & Sharma, Meenakshi, 2021. "Brand respect: Conceptualization, scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 115-123.
    8. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226316529 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Anaza, Nwamaka A. & Luis Saavedra, José & Hair, Joe F. & Bagherzadeh, Ramin & Rawal, Monika & Nedu Osakwe, Christian, 2021. "Customer-brand disidentification: Conceptualization, scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 116-131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    2. Sultan, Fareena & Rohm, Andrew J. & Gao, Tao (Tony), 2009. "Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Marketing: A Two-Country Study of Youth Markets," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 308-320.
    3. Sun, Ka Kit & He, Sylvia Y. & Thøgersen, John, 2022. "The purchase intention of electric vehicles in Hong Kong, a high-density Asian context, and main differences from a Nordic context," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 98-112.
    4. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Sebastián Molinillo & Elena Higueras-Castillo, 2022. "Do biometric payment systems work during the COVID-19 pandemic? Insights from the Spanish users' viewpoint," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Sharifi-Tehrani, Mohammad & Seyfi, Siamak & Zaman, Mustafeed, 2022. "At the intersection of tourism social entrepreneurship and empathy: Development and validation of an empathy scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 433-447.
    6. Higueras-Castillo, Elena & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco José & Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco & García-Maroto, Inmaculada, 2019. "Evaluating consumer attitudes toward electromobility and the moderating effect of perceived consumer effectiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 387-398.
    7. Park, Cheol & Lee, Thae Min, 2009. "Antecedents of Online Reviews' Usage and Purchase Influence: An Empirical Comparison of U.S. and Korean Consumers," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 332-340.
    8. Miriam Martens & Oliver Roll & Roger Elliott, 2017. "Testing the Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model for Mobile Payments Across Germany and South Africa," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Sung S. Kim & Naresh K. Malhotra, 2005. "A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption Phenomena," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 741-755, May.
    10. Bèzes, Christophe, 2014. "Definition and psychometric validation of a measurement index common to website and store images," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2559-2578.
    11. Schill, Marie & Godefroit-Winkel, Delphine & Diallo, Mbaye Fall & Barbarossa, Camilla, 2019. "Consumers’ intentions to purchase smart home objects: Do environmental issues matter?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 176-185.
    12. Marie Schill & Delphine Godefroit-Winkel & Mbaye Fall Diallo & Camilla Barbarossa, 2019. "Consumers’ intentions to purchase smart home objects: Do environmental issues matter?," Post-Print hal-02091348, HAL.
    13. Matsuo, Makoto & Minami, Chieko & Matsuyama, Takuya, 2018. "Social influence on innovation resistance in internet banking services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 42-51.
    14. Pailin Trongmateerut & John Sweeney, 2013. "The Influence of Subjective Norms on Whistle-Blowing: A Cross-Cultural Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 437-451, February.
    15. Isabel Riquelme & Sergio Román, 2014. "The Influence of Consumers’ Cognitive and Psychographic Traits on Perceived Deception: A Comparison Between Online and Offline Retailing Contexts," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(3), pages 405-422, February.
    16. Martin Eisend, 2019. "Explaining Digital Piracy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 636-664, June.
    17. Broman Toft, Madeleine & Schuitema, Geertje & Thøgersen, John, 2014. "Responsible technology acceptance: Model development and application to consumer acceptance of Smart Grid technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 392-400.
    18. Riccardo Reith & Maximilian Fischer & Bettina Lis, 2020. "Explaining the intention to use social trading platforms: an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 427-460, April.
    19. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:151:y:2022:i:c:p:623-634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.