IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v103y2019icp240-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing the persuasiveness of anti-drunk driving appeals: The effect of negative and positive message framing

Author

Listed:
  • Teng, Lefa
  • Zhao, Guangzhi
  • Li, Feng
  • Liu, Lu
  • Shen, Lulu

Abstract

A number of mass media campaigns encouraging anti-drunk driving (ADD) behavior have been implemented over the past several decades. However, the messaging within most of the current ADD advertising campaigns focuses on the negative effects on impaired drivers. Alternatively, the use of positive and targeted messages may be equally as effective and, under certain situations and for certain groups of people, can be even more persuasive than the use of negative messages. Moreover, this paper examines how the effectiveness of positive and negative ADD messages can be improved when targeting specific segments of people. Two experiments were conducted which revealed that promotion-focused individuals are motivated primarily by positive ADD messages, whereas prevention-focused individuals are motivated primarily by negative ADD messages. Furthermore, it was found that individuals who focus on immediate consequences are more easily persuaded by instant gratification rather than by pain. As for future consequences, both positive and negative consequences will be discounted and the persuasive differences between them will be reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Teng, Lefa & Zhao, Guangzhi & Li, Feng & Liu, Lu & Shen, Lulu, 2019. "Increasing the persuasiveness of anti-drunk driving appeals: The effect of negative and positive message framing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 240-249.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:240-249
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319300694
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Angela Y. & Aaker, Jennifer L. & Gardner, Wendi L., 2000. "The Pleasures and Pains of Distinct Self-Construals: The Role of Interdependence in Regulatory Focus," Research Papers 1577r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    2. Poels, Karolien & Dewitte, Siegfried, 2008. "Hope and self-regulatory goals applied to an advertising context: Promoting prevention stimulates goal-directed behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(10), pages 1030-1040, October.
    3. Subimal Chatterjee & Ashwin Vinod Malshe & Timothy B. Heath, 2010. "The effect of mixed versus blocked sequencing of promotion and prevention features on brand evaluation: The moderating role of regulatory focus," Post-Print hal-00668815, HAL.
    4. Crowe, Ellen & Higgins, E. Tory, 1997. "Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 117-132, February.
    5. Chatterjee, Subimal & Malshe, Ashwin Vinod & Heath, Timothy B., 2010. "The effect of mixed versus blocked sequencing of promotion and prevention features on brand evaluation: The moderating role of regulatory focus," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 1290-1294, December.
    6. Aaker, Jennifer L & Lee, Angela Y, 2001. ""I" Seek Pleasures and "We" Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 33-49, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balaji, M.S. & Jiang, Yangyang & Jha, Subhash, 2021. "Nanoinfluencer marketing: How message features affect credibility and behavioral intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 293-304.
    2. Yang, Bi & Mattila, Anna S., 2020. "Consumer responses to savings message framing," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Beatriz Casais & João F. Proença, 2022. "The use of positive and negative appeals in social advertising: a content analysis of television ads for preventing HIV/AIDS," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(3), pages 623-647, September.
    4. Ma, Jingjing & Mo, Zichuan & Gal, David, 2021. "The route to improve the effectiveness of negative PSAs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 669-682.
    5. Pablo Farías, 2020. "The Use of Fear versus Hope in Health Advertisements: The Moderating Role of Individual Characteristics on Subsequent Health Decisions in Chile," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bu, Kyunghee & Kim, Donghoon & Son, Jungmin, 2013. "Is the culture–emotion fit always important?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 983-988.
    2. Choi, Tae Rang & Choi, Jung Hwa & Sung, Yongjun, 2019. "I hope to protect myself from the threat: The impact of self-threat on prevention-versus promotion-focused hope," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 481-489.
    3. Agnihotri, Arpita & Bhattacharya, Saurabh & Yannopoulou, Natalia & Liu, Martin J., 2022. "Examining social media engagement through health-related message framing in different cultures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 349-360.
    4. Kim, Kyeongheui & Park, Jongwon, 2019. "Cultural influences on brand extension judgments: Opposing effects of thinking style and regulatory focus," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 137-150.
    5. Park, Tae-Youn & Kim, Seongsu & Sung, Li-Kuo, 2017. "Fair pay dispersion: A regulatory focus theory view," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Beersma, Bianca & Homan, Astrid C. & Van Kleef, Gerben A. & De Dreu, Carsten K.W., 2013. "Outcome interdependence shapes the effects of prevention focus on team processes and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 194-203.
    7. Sun, Jin & Keh, Hean Tat & Lee, Angela Y., 2019. "Shaping consumer preference using alignable attributes: The roles of regulatory orientation and construal level," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 151-168.
    8. McKay-Nesbitt, Jane & Bhatnagar, Namita & Smith, Malcolm C., 2013. "Regulatory fit effects of gender and marketing message content," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2245-2251.
    9. Zhang, Jason Q. & Craciun, Georgiana & Shin, Dongwoo, 2010. "When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 1336-1341, December.
    10. Leder, Susanne & Mannetti, Lucia & Hölzl, Erik & Kirchler, Erich, 2010. "Regulatory fit effects on perceived fiscal exchange and tax compliance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 271-277, April.
    11. Zou, Lili Wenli & Chan, Ricky Y.K., 2019. "Why and when do consumers perform green behaviors? An examination of regulatory focus and ethical ideology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 113-127.
    12. Adams, Leen & Faseur, Tineke & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "The Influence of the Self-Regulatory Focus on the Effectiveness of Stop-Smoking Campaigns for Young Smokers," Working Papers 2010/38, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    13. Yang, Zhiyong & Janakiraman, Narayan & Hossain, Mehdi T. & Grisaffe, Douglas B., 2020. "Differential effects of pay-it-forward and direct-reciprocity on prosocial behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 400-408.
    14. Lucia Mannetti & Ambra Brizi & Mauro Giacomantonio & E Tory Higgins, 2013. "Framing Political Messages to Fit the Audience’s Regulatory Orientation: How to Improve the Efficacy of the Same Message Content," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-1, October.
    15. Cheng, Yin-Hui & Yen, HsiuJu Rebecca & Chuang, Shih-Chieh & Chang, Chia-Jung, 2013. "Product option framing under the influence of a promotion versus prevention focus," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 402-413.
    16. Jaekwon Chung, 2020. "Effect of Quality Uncertainty, Regulatory Focus, and Promotional Strategies on Perceived Savings for Sustainable Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Florack, Arnd & Keller, Johannes & Palcu, Johanna, 2013. "Regulatory focus in economic contexts," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 127-137.
    18. Das, Gopal & Mukherjee, Amaradri & Smith, Ronn J., 2018. "The Perfect Fit: The Moderating Role of Selling Cues on Hedonic and Utilitarian Product Types," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 203-216.
    19. Chung-Chau Chang & Bo-Chi Lin & Shin-Shin Chang, 2011. "The relative advantages of benefit overlap versus category similarity in brand extension evaluation: The moderating role of self-regulatory focus," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 391-404, November.
    20. Aaker, Jennifer L. & Lee, Angela Y., 2006. "Understanding Regulatory Fit," Research Papers 1910, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:240-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.