IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ireced/v22y2016icp23-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching comparative economic systems 25 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Marianne
  • Kovzik, Alexander

Abstract

Twenty-five years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, we reflect on contemporary teaching of undergraduate comparative economic systems (CES). Using qualitative and quantitative measures, we consider how the field responded to the collapse by examining CES textbooks from the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. We also consider how the dissolution of the Soviet Union affected economics course offerings at the undergraduate level. Based on our findings, we suggest two strategies for reimagining CES for the 21st century by: (1) changing textbook organization and content, and (2) incorporating more comparative economic concepts throughout the undergraduate curriculum.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Marianne & Kovzik, Alexander, 2016. "Teaching comparative economic systems 25 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 23-33.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:22:y:2016:i:c:p:23-33
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2016.04.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388015302607
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iree.2016.04.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Abel Musgrave, 1941. "The Planning Approach in Public Economy: A Reply," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 55(2), pages 319-324.
    2. Djankov, Simeon & Glaeser, Edward & La Porta, Rafael & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Shleifer, Andrei, 2003. "The new comparative economics," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 595-619, December.
    3. Pryor, Frederic L., 2005. "Market economic systems," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 25-46, March.
    4. Bruno Dallago, 2004. "Comparative Economic Systems and the New Comparative Economics," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 1(1), pages 59-86, June.
    5. Ben-Ner Avner & Montias John Michael & Neuberger Egon, 1993. "Basic Issues in Organizations: A Comparative Perspective," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 207-242, June.
    6. Peter Boettke & Christopher Coyne & Peter Leeson & Frederic Sautet, 2005. "The New Comparative Political Economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 18(3), pages 281-304, December.
    7. Bruce K. Johnson & John J. Perry & Marie Petkus, 2012. "The Status of Econometrics in the Economics Major: A Survey," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 315-324, July.
    8. Peter Murrell, 2011. "The Way We Were: Reflections on the Comparative History of Comparative Economics," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 53(4), pages 489-505, December.
    9. Siegfried, John J & Wilkinson, James T, 1982. "The Economics Curriculum in the United States: 1980," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(2), pages 125-138, May.
    10. Barry W Ickes, 2005. "Economic Pathology and Comparative Economics: Why Economies Fail to Succeed1," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 47(3), pages 503-519, September.
    11. John J. Siegfried & William B. Walstad, 2014. "Undergraduate Coursework in Economics: A Survey Perspective," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 147-158, June.
    12. Mark Foley & William Pyle, 2003. "Former Socialist Economies and the Undergraduate Curriculum," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 45(4), pages 537-553, December.
    13. Jerry D. Gray & J. Michael Miller, 2011. "Intermediate Macro Texts and the Economic Crisis of 2008-09," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 10(1), pages 133-147.
    14. A. P. Lerner, 1934. "Economic Theory and Socialist Economy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 51-61.
    15. Josef C. Brada, 2009. "The New Comparative Economics versus the Old: Less Is More but Is It Enough?," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 6(1), pages 3-15, June.
    16. Eggertsson, Thráinn, 2013. "Quick guide to New Institutional Economics," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 1-5.
    17. Colander, David, 2013. "The occupy wall street movement and the principles of economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 80-83.
    18. David H. Dean & Robert C. Dolan, 2001. "Liberal Arts or Business: Does the Location of the Economics Department Alter the Major?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 18-35, January.
    19. Barbara Hopkins & Lynn Duggan, 2011. "A Feminist Comparative Economic Systems," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 35-69.
    20. Sheng Guo & Jungmin Lee, 2011. "Keeping Up With Fashion: Recent Trends in the Subfields of Study of Doctoral Students in Economics," Working Papers 1101, Florida International University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brad R. Humphreys & Joshua C. Hall & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2015. "An Inventory of Sports Economics Courses in the US," Working Papers 15-49, Department of Economics, West Virginia University.
    2. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, August.
    3. Josef C. Brada & Paul Wachtel, 2018. "Comparative Economic Studies and Comparative Economics: Six Decades and Counting," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 60(4), pages 638-656, December.
    4. Anna B. Faria & John Robert Subrick, 2023. "After Shleifer, who needs Mises?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 680-693, January.
    5. Buchen, Clemens, 2010. "Emerging economic systems in Central and Eastern Europe – a qualitative and quantitative assessment," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 37141, September.
    6. Tisha L. N. Emerson & KimMarie McGoldrick & John J. Siegfried, 2018. "The Gender Gap in Economics Degrees: An Investigation of the Role Model and Quantitative Requirements Hypotheses," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(3), pages 898-911, January.
    7. Ishuan Li & Robert Simonson, 2016. "Capstone senior research course in economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 161-167, April.
    8. J. Rosser & Marina Rosser, 2008. "A critique of the new comparative economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 81-97, March.
    9. Orcalli, Gabriele, 2017. "Market Building through Regional Integration Agreements : The EU and the ASEAN Way," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 32(1), pages 160-192.
    10. Sinclair Davidson & Jason Potts, 2016. "The Social Costs of Innovation Policy," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 282-293, October.
    11. Trent J. MacDonald, 2019. "The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18871.
    12. Cladera, Magdalena, 2021. "Assessing the attitudes of economics students towards econometrics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    13. Eva CIHELKOVA, 2016. "Formation of the theoretical framework for the comparative analysis of post-socialist countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(9), pages 407-420.
    14. Boettke, Peter J. & Coyne, Christopher J. & Leeson, Peter T., 2013. "Comparative historical political economy," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 285-301, September.
    15. Csaba, László, 2018. "Az intézményi gazdaságtan és a főáram [Institutional economics and the mainstream]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 1-23.
    16. Kiran Gajwani & Jeffrey Miron, 2015. "Engaging Undergraduates in Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 200-206, April.
    17. Nicoara Olga, 2018. "Cultural Leadership and Entrepreneurship As Antecedents of Estonia’s Singing Revolution and Post-Communist Success," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 65-91, September.
    18. ., 2019. "Economic theory of non-territorial unbundling," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit, chapter 1, pages 14-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Bruno Jossa, 2009. "Alchian And Demsetz'S Critique Of The Cooperative Firm Thirty‐Seven Years After," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 686-714, November.
    20. Jael, Paul, 2015. "Socialist Calculation and Market Socialism," MPRA Paper 64255, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Comparative economics systems; Undergraduate economics curriculum; Teaching undergraduates; Soviet Union;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate
    • P50 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:22:y:2016:i:c:p:23-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.