IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Az intézményi gazdaságtan és a főáram
[Institutional economics and the mainstream]

Author

Listed:
  • Csaba, László

Abstract

Ez az írás az intézményi közgazdaságtan és a főáram közel hét évtizedes, ellentmondásos viszonyát tekinti át. A középpontban az összehasonlító megközelítés áll, amelynek fejlődését legkiválóbb képviselője, Kornai János munkásságán keresztül mutatjuk be. Jó három évtizede szerte a világon az általános egyensúlyi megközelítés és a racionális várakozások elmélete képviseli a - neoklasszikus szintézis jelentette - főáramot. Az utóbbit a Kenneth J. Arrow és Gérard Debreu fémjelezte iskola, a tucatnyi kiadást megért, Samuelson-Nordhaus szerzőpáros és Mankiw Magyarországon is használt tankönyvei, valamint az évtizedünkben a gazdaságpolitikában irányadóvá vált új keynesi irányzat jelenítik meg. Kutatási kérdésünk az, hogy miért nem jött létre termékenyebb és közvetlenebb kapcsolat a két irányzat között. Miért nem hozott létre párbeszédet kettejük között a rendszerváltozás és a 2007-2009. évi pénzügyi válság elemzése? Hipotézisünk szerint a valósággal kapcsolatos ismeretelméleti-felfogásbeli eltérések olyan mélyek, hogy áthidalhatatlan módszertani szakadékhoz vezettek. A tudomány versengő megközelítései ezért sem elegyíthetők tetszés szerint.** Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: A10, B25, B31.

Suggested Citation

  • Csaba, László, 2018. "Az intézményi gazdaságtan és a főáram [Institutional economics and the mainstream]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 1-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1743
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2018.1.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1743
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2018.1.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry Naughton, 2017. "Is China Socialist?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(1), pages 3-24, Winter.
    2. Djankov, Simeon & Glaeser, Edward & La Porta, Rafael & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Shleifer, Andrei, 2003. "The new comparative economics," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 595-619, December.
    3. De Vroey,Michel, 2016. "A History of Macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and Beyond," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107584945, September.
    4. Paul M. Romer, 2015. "Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 89-93, May.
    5. Lucas, Robert E, Jr, 1996. "Nobel Lecture: Monetary Neutrality," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(4), pages 661-682, August.
    6. Bruno Dallago, 2004. "Comparative Economic Systems and the New Comparative Economics," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 1(1), pages 59-86, June.
    7. Tinbergen, Jan, 1995. "The Duration of Development," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 333-339, September.
    8. Alan S. Blinder, 1988. "The Fall and Rise of Keynesian Economics," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 64(4), pages 278-294, December.
    9. Mark Blaug, 2001. "No History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 145-164, Winter.
    10. Mark Blaug, 2001. "No History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists: Response," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 222-222, Fall.
    11. repec:bla:ecorec:v:64:y:1988:i:187:p:278-94 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kornai, János, 1999. "A rendszerparadigma. Fogalmi tisztázás [The system paradigm]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 585-599.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pásztor, Szabolcs, 2019. "Gondolatok a fejlesztési segélyek negatív hatásairól P. T. Bauer szellemi örökségének tükrében [Some thoughts on the negative effects of development aid in terms of P. T. Bauers Intellectual Legacy," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1093-1120.
    2. Csaba, László, 2022. "Előszó," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 1-2.
    3. Rosta, Miklós, 2021. "Előszó," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 1-6.
    4. Kerényi, Ádám, 2018. ""Kornai-láz" a Közgázon. Beszámoló a Kornai János 90. születésnapja alkalmából szervezett eseménysorozatról, 2018. január-február ["Kornai fever" at the Economics University. Re," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 667-676.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kornai, János, 2006. "A társadalomtudományok elkülönüléséről és együttműködéséről [Differentiation and cooperation in the social sciences]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 949-960.
    2. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2019. "Values of Economists Matter in the Art and Science of Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 472-499, August.
    3. Marc Flandreau & John Komlos, 2001. "How to Run a Target Zone ? Age Old Lessons from an Austro-Hungarian Experiment," Working Papers hal-01064999, HAL.
    4. Chatelain, Jean-Bernard & Ralf, Kirsten, 2018. "Publish and Perish: Creative Destruction and Macroeconomic Theory," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 65-101.
    5. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, December.
    6. Francesco Sergi, 2020. "The Standard Narrative about DSGE Models in Central Banks’ Technical Reports," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 163-193, March.
    7. David Laidler, 2013. "Mark Blaug on the quantity theory: a skirmish on the border between science and ideology in the history of economic thought," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 7, pages 63-77, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Marc Flandreau & John Komlos, 2003. "Target Zones in History and Theory : Lessons from an Austro-Hungarian Experiment, 1896-1914," Working Papers hal-01065060, HAL.
    9. Csaba, László, 2016. "Új utakon a világ közgazdaság-tudománya. Gondolatok D. N. McCloskey: Bourgeois Equality című monográfiája kapcsán [New paths in world economics. Some ideas in relation to the monograph D. N. McClos," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 882-888.
    10. Oliver Landmann, 2022. "Stabilization Policy: A Turbulent Journey Through Time," Discussion Paper Series 42, Department of International Economic Policy, University of Freiburg, revised Sep 2022.
    11. Goutsmedt, Aurélien & Sergi, Francesco & Guizzo, Danielle, 2019. "An Agenda without a Plan: Robert E. Lucas's Trajectory throught the Public Debate," OSF Preprints 7jpa9, Center for Open Science.
    12. Galbács, Péter, 2017. "Max Weber és a modern makroökonómia újraértelmezése. Elméleti keret a kortárs makroökonómia módszertani elemzéséhez [Max Weber and reinterpretation of modern macroeconomics. A theoretical framework," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 285-304.
    13. Anthony Brewer, 2012. "Mark Blaug, 1927--2011," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 475-480, June.
    14. Claudius Graebner & Stephan Puehringer, 2021. "Competition universalism: Its historical origins and timely alternatives," ICAE Working Papers 125, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    15. André Lapidus, 2016. "Pourquoi l'histoire de la pensée économique est-elle différente des autres histoires ? [Почему История Экономической Мысли Отличается От Других Историй?]," Post-Print hal-01619020, HAL.
    16. Stavros A. DRAKOPOULOS, 2016. "Economic crisis, economic methodology and the scientific ideal of physics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 28-57, November.
    17. Möller Ulrich & McCaffrey Matthew, 2023. "Entrepreneurship and Firm Strategy: Integrating Resources, Capabilities, and Judgment through an Austrian Framework," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 997-1031, October.
    18. Wilfred Dolfsma & Patrick J. Welch, 2009. "Paradigms and Novelty in Economics: The History of Economic Thought as a Source of Enlightenment," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(5), pages 1085-1106, November.
    19. Mario A. Cedrini & Roberto Marchionatti, 2017. "On the Theoretical and Practical Relevance of the Concept of Gift to the Development of a Non-imperialist Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 633-649, December.
    20. Bruce Caldwell, 2013. "Of Positivism and the History of Economic Thought," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 79(4), pages 753-767, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.