IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v100y2023ics016028962300065x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting cross-national sex differences in large-scale assessments of students' reading literacy, mathematics, and science achievement: Evidence from PIRLS and TIMSS

Author

Listed:
  • Oberleiter, Sandra
  • Fries, Jonathan
  • Schock, Laura S.
  • Steininger, Benedikt
  • Pietschnig, Jakob

Abstract

Causes of sex differences in educational achievement have been controversially discussed in the extant literature. It has been speculated that differing prosperity and equality of opportunities may be linked to these differences, but conclusive empirical evidence for such effects is unavailable. Here, we present evidence for sex differences in international large-scale assessments of reading literacy, mathematics, and science across 16 cohorts from 1995 to 2019. Our analyses of PIRLS and TIMSS reading literacy, mathematics, and science achievement data (N = 3,999,062; 90 countries) showed consistent advantages for girls in reading literacy (d range: −0.02 to 0.66). For mathematics and science this pattern was less unambiguous, yielding non-trivial effects in both directions (d ranges: −0.44 to 0.36 and − 0.50 to 0.46, respectively). Sex differences in all three domains were more pronounced in more egalitarian countries (β range 0.16 to 0.20). Higher national prosperity and educational investment predicted larger sex differences favoring fourth grade boys in mathematics and science (β range: 0.07 to 0.39) and became less meaningful with increasing student ages (β range for eighth graders: 0.17 to 0.21). In all, our findings suggest that influences of economic macro-indicators on sex differences in educational achievement are differentiated according to subject, indicating larger sex differences in mathematics and science in more egalitarian and prosperous countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Oberleiter, Sandra & Fries, Jonathan & Schock, Laura S. & Steininger, Benedikt & Pietschnig, Jakob, 2023. "Predicting cross-national sex differences in large-scale assessments of students' reading literacy, mathematics, and science achievement: Evidence from PIRLS and TIMSS," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:100:y:2023:i:c:s016028962300065x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2023.101784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028962300065X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2023.101784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gijsbert Stoet & David C Geary, 2013. "Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement Are Inversely Related: Within- and Across-Nation Assessment of 10 Years of PISA Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, March.
    2. Giofrè, D. & Cornoldi, C. & Martini, A. & Toffalini, E., 2020. "A population level analysis of the gender gap in mathematics: Results on over 13 million children using the INVALSI dataset," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Thomas Breda & Elyes Jouini & Clotilde Napp, 2018. "Societal inequalities amplify gender gaps in math," Post-Print hal-01745438, HAL.
    4. David Reilly, 2012. "Gender, Culture, and Sex-Typed Cognitive Abilities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Reynolds, Matthew R. & Hajovsky, Daniel B. & Caemmerer, Jacqueline M., 2022. "The sexes do not differ in general intelligence, but they do in some specifics," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Molly P. Howell & Christopher C. Klein, 2018. "Connecting Cultural Gender Norms and National Prosperity," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(1), pages 33-38, Spring.
    7. Wai, Jonathan & Hodges, Jaret & Makel, Matthew C., 2018. "Sex differences in ability tilt in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 35-year examination," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 76-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giofrè, D. & Allen, K. & Toffalini, E. & Mammarella, I.C. & Caviola, S., 2022. "Decoding gender differences: Intellectual profiles of children with specific learning disabilities," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Giannelli, Gianna Claudia & Rapallini, Chiara, 2016. "Immigrant student performance in Math: Does it matter where you come from?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 291-304.
    3. Li, Dai & Wang, Yizhen & Li, Lantian, 2023. "Educational choice has greater effects on sex ratios of college STEM majors than has the greater male variance in general intelligence (g)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Giofrè, D. & Cornoldi, C. & Martini, A. & Toffalini, E., 2020. "A population level analysis of the gender gap in mathematics: Results on over 13 million children using the INVALSI dataset," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Martin Asperholm & Sanket Nagar & Serhiy Dekhtyar & Agneta Herlitz, 2019. "The magnitude of sex differences in verbal episodic memory increases with social progress: Data from 54 countries across 40 years," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.
    6. Huong Thu Le & Ha Trong Nguyen, 2018. "The evolution of the gender test score gap through seventh grade: new insights from Australia using unconditional quantile regression and decomposition," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-42, December.
    7. Shulamit Kahn & Donna Ginther, 2017. "Women and STEM," NBER Working Papers 23525, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Maarten Jan Wensink & Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt & Sören Möller, 2020. "Variability Matters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Afkar,Rythia & Yarrow,Noah Bunce & Surbakti,Soedarti & Cooper,Rachel Danielle, 2020. "Inclusion in Indonesia's Education Sector : A Subnational Review of Gender Gaps and Children with Disabilities," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9282, The World Bank.
    10. Markus Daniel Meier, 2021. "Ars docendi," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1325, march.
    11. M. E Letsoalo, 2018. "The Effect of Mathematics and Physical Science on Matriculants’ Overall Performances: Analysis Using Multilevel Model," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 8(4), pages 28-42.
    12. Geary, David C., 2022. "Spatial ability as a distinct domain of human cognition: An evolutionary perspective," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Sadowski, Ireneusz & Zawistowska, Alicja, 2020. "The net effect of ability tilt in gendered STEM-related choices," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Daniel Doz & Mara Cotič & Darjo Felda, 2023. "Random Forest Regression in Predicting Students’ Achievements and Fuzzy Grades," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Loesche, Philipp Manuel, 2019. "Estimating the true extent of gender differences in scholastic achievement: A neural network approach," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Munir, Farzana & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf, 2018. "Decomposing international gender test score differences," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 52(1), pages 1-12.
    17. Ülle Säälik, 2015. "Reading performance, learning strategies, gender and school language as related issues ? PISA 2009 findings in Finland and Estonia," International Journal of Teaching and Education, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 3(2), pages 17-30, June.
    18. Recep BİNDAK, 0. "Lojistik Regresyon Analizi ile Pisa Araştırmasında Öğrenci Başarısının Modellenmesi," EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 14(28), pages 57-74.
    19. Daly, Michael & Obschonka, Martin & Stuetzer, Michael & Sutin, Angelina & Shaw-Taylor, Leigh & Satchell, Max & Robinson, Eric, 2019. "Neuroticism Mediates the Relationship Between Industrial History and Modern-Day Regional Obesity Levels," MPRA Paper 106505, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Jul 2020.
    20. Daniel Doz & Darjo Felda & Mara Cotič, 2023. "Demographic Factors Affecting Fuzzy Grading: A Hierarchical Linear Regression Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:100:y:2023:i:c:s016028962300065x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.