IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v11y2023i11p196-d1279098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Claims Modelling with Three-Component Composite Models

Author

Listed:
  • Jackie Li

    (Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia)

  • Jia Liu

    (Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies & Statistics, Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia)

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a number of new composite models for modelling individual claims in general insurance. All our models contain a Weibull distribution for the smallest claims, a lognormal distribution for the medium-sized claims, and a long-tailed distribution for the largest claims. They provide a more detailed categorisation of claims sizes when compared to the existing composite models which differentiate only between the small and large claims. For each proposed model, we express four of the parameters as functions of the other parameters. We fit these models to two real-world insurance data sets using both maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation, and test their goodness-of-fit based on several statistical criteria. They generally outperform the existing composite models in the literature, which comprise only two components. We also perform regression using the proposed models.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackie Li & Jia Liu, 2023. "Claims Modelling with Three-Component Composite Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:196-:d:1279098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/11/196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/11/196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McNeil, Alexander J., 1997. "Estimating the Tails of Loss Severity Distributions Using Extreme Value Theory," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 117-137, May.
    2. Abu Bakar, S.A. & Hamzah, N.A. & Maghsoudi, M. & Nadarajah, S., 2015. "Modeling loss data using composite models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 146-154.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miljkovic, Tatjana & Grün, Bettina, 2016. "Modeling loss data using mixtures of distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 387-396.
    2. Reynkens, Tom & Verbelen, Roel & Beirlant, Jan & Antonio, Katrien, 2017. "Modelling censored losses using splicing: A global fit strategy with mixed Erlang and extreme value distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 65-77.
    3. Bhati, Deepesh & Ravi, Sreenivasan, 2018. "On generalized log-Moyal distribution: A new heavy tailed size distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 247-259.
    4. Semhar Michael & Tatjana Miljkovic & Volodymyr Melnykov, 2020. "Mixture modeling of data with multiple partial right-censoring levels," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 355-378, June.
    5. Johan René van Dorp & Ekundayo Shittu, 2024. "Two-sided distributions with applications in insurance loss modeling," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 33(3), pages 827-861, July.
    6. Punzo, Antonio & Bagnato, Luca & Maruotti, Antonello, 2018. "Compound unimodal distributions for insurance losses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 95-107.
    7. Gijbels, Irène & Sznajder, Dominik, 2013. "Testing tail monotonicity by constrained copula estimation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 338-351.
    8. S. A. Abu Bakar & Saralees Nadarajah & Z. A. Absl Kamarul Adzhar, 2018. "Loss modeling using Burr mixtures," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1503-1516, June.
    9. Dingshi Tian & Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang, 2018. "Econometric Modeling of Risk Measures: A Selective Review of the Recent Literature," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201807, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2018.
    10. Chen, Zezhun & Dassios, Angelos & Tzougas, George, 2022. "EM estimation for the bivariate mixed exponential regression model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115132, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Cristina Sommacampagna, 2002. "Stima del Value-at-Risk con il Filtro di Kalman," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 92(6), pages 147-174, November-.
    12. Søren Asmussen & Jaakko Lehtomaa, 2017. "Distinguishing Log-Concavity from Heavy Tails," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Martin Hrba & Matúš Maciak & Barbora Peštová & Michal Pešta, 2022. "Bootstrapping Not Independent and Not Identically Distributed Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Jose Fernandes & Augusto Hasman & Juan Ignacio Pena, 2007. "Risk premium: insights over the threshold," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 41-59.
    15. Gencay, Ramazan & Selcuk, Faruk & Ulugulyagci, Abdurrahman, 2003. "High volatility, thick tails and extreme value theory in value-at-risk estimation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 337-356, October.
    16. Brazauskas, Vytaras & Kleefeld, Andreas, 2009. "Robust and efficient fitting of the generalized Pareto distribution with actuarial applications in view," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 424-435, December.
    17. Goran Andjelic & Ivana Milosev & Vladimir Djakovic, 2010. "Extreme Value Theory In Emerging Markets," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 55(185), pages 63-106, April - J.
    18. Min Deng & Mostafa Aminzadeh & Min Ji, 2021. "Bayesian Predictive Analysis of Natural Disaster Losses," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Eling, Martin, 2012. "Fitting insurance claims to skewed distributions: Are the skew-normal and skew-student good models?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 239-248.
    20. Ibrahim Onour, "undated". "Extreme Risk and Fat-tails Distribution Model:Empirical Analysis," API-Working Paper Series 0911, Arab Planning Institute - Kuwait, Information Center.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:11:p:196-:d:1279098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.