IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v102y2022icp1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring and comparing risks of different types

Author

Listed:
  • Aigner, Maximilian
  • Chavez-Demoulin, Valérie
  • Guillou, Armelle

Abstract

Being able to compare risk measures in practice is crucial in many applications such as in finance, insurance or environmental science. The difficulty is that the variables of interest are not always of the same nature, nor of the same type or scale. Thus the usual risk measures are often misleading and to solve this issue we propose to use the Expected Proportional Shortfall (EPS) which is scale invariant and thus, which does not depend on the unit of measurement. To estimate the EPS, an estimator of the tail index γ is required. The main asymptotic properties of our EPS estimator are provided under very general assumptions in case of d-variate β-mixing processes with Pareto-type marginals. Then, we propose a test statistic based on the EPS estimators to compare different risks, whatever their nature/type/scale are. Since the performances of the test statistic are poor when a biased estimate of γ is used, we propose to perform our EPS estimation with an asymptotically unbiased estimator for γ. The efficiency of our test statistic is illustrated in a simulation experiment and validated on an environmental dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Aigner, Maximilian & Chavez-Demoulin, Valérie & Guillou, Armelle, 2022. "Measuring and comparing risks of different types," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:102:y:2022:i:c:p:1-21
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668721001608
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Einmahl, J.H.J. & Gantner, M. & Sawitzki, G., 2008. "The Shorth Plot," Discussion Paper 2008-24, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Chavez-Demoulin, Valérie & Guillou, Armelle, 2018. "Extreme quantile estimation for β-mixing time series and applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 59-74.
    3. Nicholas M. Kiefer & Timothy J. Vogelsang & Helle Bunzel, 2000. "Simple Robust Testing of Regression Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 695-714, May.
    4. Belzunce, Félix & Pinar, José F. & Ruiz, José M. & Sordo, Miguel A., 2012. "Comparison of risks based on the expected proportional shortfall," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 292-302.
    5. Xiaofeng Shao, 2015. "Self-Normalization for Time Series: A Review of Recent Developments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1797-1817, December.
    6. Lin, Zheng Yan & Choi, Yong-Kab, 1999. "Some limit theorems for fractional Lévy Brownian fields," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 229-244, August.
    7. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    8. Yannick Hoga, 2018. "Detecting Tail Risk Differences in Multivariate Time Series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 665-689, September.
    9. Julien Worms & Rym Worms, 2015. "A Test for Comparing Tail Indices for Heavy-Tailed Distributions via Empirical Likelihood," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(15), pages 3289-3302, August.
    10. Lobato I. N., 2001. "Testing That a Dependent Process Is Uncorrelated," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1066-1076, September.
    11. Yuri Goegebeur & Armelle Guillou, 2013. "Asymptotically Unbiased Estimation of the Coefficient of Tail Dependence," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(1), pages 174-189, March.
    12. Severini,Thomas A., 2005. "Elements of Distribution Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521844727, November.
    13. Xiaofeng Shao, 2010. "A self‐normalized approach to confidence interval construction in time series," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 343-366, June.
    14. Hoga, Yannick, 2017. "Change Point Tests For The Tail Index Of Β-Mixing Random Variables," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(4), pages 915-954, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong, Yongmiao & Linton, Oliver & McCabe, Brendan & Sun, Jiajing & Wang, Shouyang, 2024. "Kolmogorov–Smirnov type testing for structural breaks: A new adjusted-range based self-normalization approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(2).
    2. Bai, Shuyang & Taqqu, Murad S. & Zhang, Ting, 2016. "A unified approach to self-normalized block sampling," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(8), pages 2465-2493.
    3. Han, Heejoon & Linton, Oliver & Oka, Tatsushi & Whang, Yoon-Jae, 2016. "The cross-quantilogram: Measuring quantile dependence and testing directional predictability between time series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 251-270.
    4. Kim, Seonjin & Zhao, Zhibiao & Shao, Xiaofeng, 2015. "Nonparametric functional central limit theorem for time series regression with application to self-normalized confidence interval," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 277-290.
    5. Zhang, Jingsi & Jiang, Wenxin & Shao, Xiaofeng, 2013. "Bayesian model selection based on parameter estimates from subsamples," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(4), pages 979-986.
    6. Xuexin Wang & Yixiao Sun, 2020. "An Asymptotic F Test for Uncorrelatedness in the Presence of Time Series Dependence," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 536-550, July.
    7. Yi-Ting Chen & Zhongjun Qu, 2015. "M Tests with a New Normalization Matrix," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 617-652, May.
    8. Yeonwoo Rho & Xiaofeng Shao, 2015. "Inference for Time Series Regression Models With Weakly Dependent and Heteroscedastic Errors," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 444-457, July.
    9. Lin Fan & Peter W. Glynn & Markus Pelger, 2018. "Change-Point Testing for Risk Measures in Time Series," Papers 1809.02303, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    10. Chen, Willa W. & Deo, Rohit S., 2018. "Subsampling based inference for U statistics under thick tails using self-normalization," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 95-103.
    11. Sun, Jiajing & Hong, Yongmiao & Linton, Oliver & Zhao, Xiaolu, 2022. "Adjusted-range self-normalized confidence interval construction for censored dependent data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    12. Daniel J. Nordman & Helle Bunzel & Soumendra N. Lahiri, 2012. "A Non-standard Empirical Likelihood for Time Series," CREATES Research Papers 2012-55, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    13. Choi, Ji-Eun & Shin, Dong Wan, 2020. "A self-normalization test for correlation change," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Xiaofeng Shao, 2010. "A self‐normalized approach to confidence interval construction in time series," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(3), pages 343-366, June.
    15. Marcelo Brutti Righi & Paulo Sergio Ceretta, 2015. "Shortfall Deviation Risk: An alternative to risk measurement," Papers 1501.02007, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.
    16. Jiang, Feiyu & Wang, Runmin & Shao, Xiaofeng, 2023. "Robust inference for change points in high dimension," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Uribe, Jorge M. & Guillen, Montserrat & Mosquera-López, Stephania, 2018. "Uncovering the nonlinear predictive causality between natural gas and electricity prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 904-916.
    18. Lee, Wei-Ming & Kuan, Chung-Ming & Hsu, Yu-Chin, 2014. "Testing over-identifying restrictions without consistent estimation of the asymptotic covariance matrix," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 181-193.
    19. Ji-Eun Choi & Dong Wan Shin, 2021. "A self-normalization break test for correlation matrix," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2333-2353, October.
    20. Yixiao Sun & Peter C.B. Phillips, 2008. "Optimal Bandwidth Choice for Interval Estimation in GMM Regression," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1661, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Asymptotically unbiased estimator; β-mixing; Convergence in distribution; Expected Proportional Shortfall; Hypothesis testing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:102:y:2022:i:c:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.