IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v101y2011i1p87-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational health and safety policy and psychosocial risks in Europe: The role of stakeholders' perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Iavicoli, Sergio
  • Natali, Elena
  • Deitinger, Patrizia
  • Maria Rondinone, Bruna
  • Ertel, Michael
  • Jain, Aditya
  • Leka, Stavroula

Abstract

Introduction Psychosocial risks are now largely acknowledged throughout Europe as important challenges in occupational health and safety. However, there appear to be wide gaps in perception between experts and the general population on the nature and the relevance of psychosocial risks that have a potential impact on policy development and implementation in this area.Methods This study investigated the level of knowledge among European stakeholders, of legislation on occupational safety and health, focusing particularly on psychosocial risk factors. 75 members of employers' associations, trade unions and government institutions from 21 countries in the European Union (EU) participated in the study. In addition, to further elaborate the findings of the survey, focus groups were organised during a 2-day stakeholder workshop.Results The level of application of European Directive 89/391 for the assessment and management of psychosocial risks and work-related stress was largely reported by the stakeholders as inadequate. This opinion was more marked in the new EU27 countries than the older EU15, and the difference was significant as regards the impact of the Directive on the assessment and management of psychosocial risks. Overall, psychosocial risks and work-related stress were reported to be important occupational health and safety concerns; however there were important differences among stakeholders in different countries.Conclusions Despite the development of knowledge and activities on both the policy and practice levels in recent years, further work is still needed to harmonize stakeholder perceptions in this area in the various EU member states.

Suggested Citation

  • Iavicoli, Sergio & Natali, Elena & Deitinger, Patrizia & Maria Rondinone, Bruna & Ertel, Michael & Jain, Aditya & Leka, Stavroula, 2011. "Occupational health and safety policy and psychosocial risks in Europe: The role of stakeholders' perceptions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 87-94, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:101:y:2011:i:1:p:87-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851010002290
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radealli, Claudio M., 2000. "Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 4, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tang, Jessica Janice & Leka, Stavroula & Hunt, Nigel & MacLennan, Sara, 2011. "Occupational psychosocial health policies in Hong Kong schools: A review and exploration of key stakeholder perceptions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 266-275.
    2. Guadix, José & Carrillo-Castrillo, Jesús & Onieva, Luis & Lucena, David, 2015. "Strategies for psychosocial risk management in manufacturing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1475-1480.
    3. Frédéric Dutheil & Bruno Pereira & Farès Moustafa & Geraldine Naughton & François-Xavier Lesage & Céline Lambert, 2017. "At-risk and intervention thresholds of occupational stress using a visual analogue scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    4. David Gold & Andrew Sharman & David Thomas, 2022. "Examining the role of the occupational safety and health professional in supporting the control of the risks of multiple psychosocial stressors generated during the COVID-19 pandemic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Jodi Oakman & Katrina A. Lambert & Victoria P. Weale & Rwth Stuckey & Melissa Graham, 2023. "Employees Working from Home: Do Leadership Factors Influence Work-Related Stress and Musculoskeletal Pain?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
    6. Aditya Jain & Juliet Hassard & Stavroula Leka & Cristina Di Tecco & Sergio Iavicoli, 2021. "The Role of Occupational Health Services in Psychosocial Risk Management and the Promotion of Mental Health and Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Irene Houtman & Marianne van Zwieten & Stavroula Leka & Aditya Jain & Ernest de Vroome, 2020. "Social Dialogue and Psychosocial Risk Management: Added Value of Manager and Employee Representative Agreement in Risk Perception and Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Kyris, 2013. "Europeanization beyond Contested Statehood: The European Union and Turkish-Cypriot Civil Society," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 866-883, September.
    2. Janis KAPUSTANS, 2022. "Effectiveness of the European Union grants to civil society in the Baltic states: an evaluation of the EU program ‘Europe for Citizens’ (2007-2020)," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 99-119, October.
    3. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:1-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Adrian Favell & Virginie Guiraudon, 2009. "The Sociology of the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 10(4), pages 550-576, December.
    5. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    6. Kataryna Wolczuk, 2004. "Integration without Europeanisation: Ukraine and its Policy towards the European Union," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 15, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    7. Wade Jacoby & Gabriel Lataianu & Camelia Lataianu, 2009. "Success in slow motion: The Europeanization of Romanian child protection policy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 111-133, June.
    8. Tanja Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2000. "International Relations Theory and European Integration," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 56, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    9. Donatella della Porta & Manuela Caiani, 2006. "The Europeanization of Public Discourse in Italy," European Union Politics, , vol. 7(1), pages 77-112, March.
    10. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:787-810 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Mark Aspinwall, 2009. "NAFTA‐ization: Regionalization and Domestic Political Adjustment in the North American Economic Area," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Stefan Niederhafner, 2013. "Comparing functions of transnational city networks in Europe and Asia," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 377-396, December.
    13. Brüggemann, Michael & Kleinen von Königslöw, Katharina, 2007. "'Let's talk about Europe'. Explaining vertical and horizontal Europeanization in the quality press," TranState Working Papers 60, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    14. Koen Caminada & Kees Goudswaard & Olaf Van Vliet, 2010. "Patterns of Welfare State Indicators in the EU: Is there Convergence?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 529-556, June.
    15. Štěpánka Zemanová & Radka Druláková, 2012. "Europeanization after Lisbon: Competencies, Governance and Domestic Changes in the Context of the new EU Primary Legislation [Evropeizace po Lisabonu: Kompetence, governance a domácí změny v kontex," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(2), pages 65-82.
    16. Ileana Tache & Cristina Neesham, 2009. "The Impact of the Europeanization Process on State-Industry Interaction in Romania," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 17-36.
    17. Loik Ramon, 2016. "Integration Trends of EU Internal Security and Law Enforcement: How Legal, Technological and Operational Advancements Matter," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 3-27, October.
    18. Jorge Afonso & Paulo Conceição, 2024. "Europeanisation in the Field of Housing: Its Areas of Influence, Different Approaches, Mechanisms, and Missing Links," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, May.
    19. Michael Baun & Jakub Dürr & Dan Marek & Pavel Šaradín, 2006. "The Europeanization of Czech Politics: The Political Parties and the EU Referendum," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 249-280, June.
    20. Toens, Katrin, 2006. "Lobbying for Justice? Organized Welfare in Germany under the Impact of Europeanization," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 10, September.
    21. Tanja E. Aalberts, 2005. "Sovereignty Reloaded? A Constructivist Perspective on European Research," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0010, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    22. Haverland, Markus, 2005. "Does the EU cause domestic developments? The problem of case selection in Europeanization research," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 9, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:101:y:2011:i:1:p:87-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.