IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v66y2018icp133-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trying to bridge the worlds of home visitation and child welfare: Lessons learned from a formative evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Stahlschmidt, Mary Jo
  • Jonson-Reid, Melissa
  • Pons, Laura
  • Constantino, John
  • Kohl, Patricia L.
  • Drake, Brett
  • Auslander, Wendy

Abstract

Young children in families contacting the child welfare system are at high risk of recurrent maltreatment and poor developmental outcomes. Home visitation programs to support parenting may offer hope as a preventive resource but these programs are rarely linked with child welfare. This article describes findings from a formative evaluation of a program designed to connect child welfare-involved families to an existing evidence-supported home visitation program. The program, Early Childhood Connections (ECC), was developed by a field-university partnership including leaders from a public state child welfare system, regional early childhood education systems, and several local agencies providing family support services. Despite extensive and rigorous planning by the workgroup and collaborative refining of the intervention approach as agency needs changed, the continued structural and policy changes within both the home visitation agency and the child welfare agencies created significant ongoing barriers to implementation. On the other hand, child welfare-involved families were receptive to engaging with home visitation. Implications of lessons learned for ongoing program development in this area are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stahlschmidt, Mary Jo & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Pons, Laura & Constantino, John & Kohl, Patricia L. & Drake, Brett & Auslander, Wendy, 2018. "Trying to bridge the worlds of home visitation and child welfare: Lessons learned from a formative evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 133-140.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:133-140
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718916303433
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcynyszyn, Lyscha A. & Maher, Erin J. & Corwin, Tyler W., 2011. "Getting with the (evidence-based) program: An evaluation of the Incredible Years Parenting Training Program in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 747-757, May.
    2. McBeath, Bowen & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Chuang, Emmeline & Wells, Rebecca & Bunger, Alicia C. & Jolles, Mónica Pérez, 2014. "New directions for research on the organizational and institutional context of child welfare agencies: Introduction to the symposium on “The Organizational and Managerial Context of Private Child Welf," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 83-92.
    3. Littell, Julia H., 1997. "Effects of the duration, intensity, and breadth of family preservation services: A new analysis of data from the illinois family first experiment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 17-39.
    4. Horwitz, Sarah McCue & Hurlburt, Michael S. & Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D. & Palinkas, Lawrence A. & Rolls-Reutz, Jennifer & Zhang, JinJin & Fisher, Emily & Landsverk, John, 2014. "Exploration and adoption of evidence-based practice by US child welfare agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 147-152.
    5. Blome, Wendy Whiting & Steib, Sue D., 2014. "The organizational structure of child welfare: Staff are working hard, but it is hardly working," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 181-188.
    6. repec:mpr:mprres:7046 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiang, Chien-Jen & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Kim, Hyunil & Drake, Brett & Pons, Laura & Kohl, Patricia & Constantino, John N. & Auslander, Wendy, 2018. "Service engagement and retention: Lessons from the Early Childhood Connections Program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 114-127.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gibson, Katherine & Samuels, Gina & Pryce, Julia, 2018. "Authors of accountability: Paperwork and social work in contemporary child welfare practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 43-52.
    2. Sorek, Yoa & Szabo-Lael, Rachel & Almog-Zaken, Aya, 2024. "“Welfare used to mean darkness – Now it’s beaming with light”: Professionals and parents’ perceptions of a family preservation program in Israel," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Debra A. Strong & Alyson Burnett & Patricia Del Grosso & Mathew Stange, "undated". "Partnering to Reduce Substance Use and Child Maltreatment: 2014 Regional Partnership Grants Final Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 124298087de0448caf08cbf1f, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Javier Pérez-Padilla & Susana Menéndez & Oscar Lozano, 2015. "Validity of the Parenting Stress Index Short Form in a Sample of At-Risk Mothers," Evaluation Review, , vol. 39(4), pages 428-446, August.
    5. Debra Strong & Russell Cole & Angela D’Angelo & Juliette Henke & Yange Xue, "undated". "RPG Child and Family Outcomes: Fifth Annual Report to Congress," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7bfa5cccd7a84c6ba26691d9b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    6. Crea, Thomas M. & Usher, Charles L. & Wildfire, Judith B., 2009. "Implementation fidelity of Team Decisionmaking," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 119-124, January.
    7. Vito, Rosemary, 2020. "Key variations in organizational culture and leadership influence: A comparison between three children’s mental health and child welfare agencies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Miller, J. Jay & Niu, Chunling & Moody, Shannon, 2020. "Child welfare workers and peritraumatic distress: The impact of COVID-19," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Gubbels, Jeanne & Assink, Mark & Ravesteijn, Bastian & Weeland, Joyce & Chhangur, Rabia R. & Bouwmeester-Landweer, Merian & van den Heijkant, Silvia & van der Put, Claudia E., 2023. "Long-term collateral effects of parent programs on child maltreatment proxies: Can administrative data provide useful insights?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Bloom, Martin, 1998. "Primary prevention and foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(8), pages 667-696, October.
    11. Chambers, Ruth M. & Brocato, Jo & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2016. "An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 143-151.
    12. Chambers, Ruth M. & Crutchfield, Rashida M. & Goddu Harper, Stephanie G. & Fatemi, Maryam & Rodriguez, Angel Y., 2018. "Family reunification in child welfare practice: A pilot study of parent and staff experiences," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 221-231.
    13. Garcia, Antonio R. & Circo, Elizabeth & DeNard, Christina & Hernandez, Natalie, 2015. "Barriers and facilitators to delivering effective mental health practice strategies for youth and families served by the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 110-122.
    14. Bagdasaryan, Sofya, 2005. "Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question of effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 615-635, June.
    15. Chuang, Emmeline & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & McBeath, Bowen & Jolles, Monica Pérez, 2023. "Organizational supports for evidence use in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Leathers, Sonya J. & Melka-Kaffer, Catherine & Spielfogel, Jill E. & Atkins, Marc S., 2016. "Use of evidence-based interventions in child welfare: Do attitudes matter?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 375-382.
    17. Schelbe, Lisa & Radey, Melissa & Panisch, Lisa S., 2017. "Satisfactions and stressors experienced by recently-hired frontline child welfare workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 56-63.
    18. Berry, Marianne, 1998. "Adoption in an Era of family preservation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 1-12.
    19. McBeath, Bowen & Collins-Camargo, Crystal & Chuang, Emmeline & Wells, Rebecca & Bunger, Alicia C. & Jolles, Mónica Pérez, 2014. "New directions for research on the organizational and institutional context of child welfare agencies: Introduction to the symposium on “The Organizational and Managerial Context of Private Child Welf," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 83-92.
    20. Stroobants, Tim & Vanderfaeillie, Johan & Andries, Caroline & Van Holen, Frank, 2016. "Youth care workers' perspectives on and adoption of evidence-based practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 299-307.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:66:y:2018:i:c:p:133-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.