IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v20y1998i1-2p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption in an Era of family preservation

Author

Listed:
  • Berry, Marianne

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Berry, Marianne, 1998. "Adoption in an Era of family preservation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 1-12.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:20:y:1998:i:1-2:p:1-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(97)00064-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindsey, Duncan, 1994. "Family preservation and child protection: Striking a balance," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(5-6), pages 279-294.
    2. Littell, Julia H., 1997. "Effects of the duration, intensity, and breadth of family preservation services: A new analysis of data from the illinois family first experiment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 17-39.
    3. Maluccio, Anthony N. & Abramczyk, Lois W. & Thomlison, Barbara, 1996. "Family reunification of children in out-of-home care: Research perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4-5), pages 287-305.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Girvin, Heather, 2004. "Beyond `stages of change:' using readiness for change and caregiver-reported problems to identify meaningful subgroups in a child welfare sample," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(10), pages 897-917, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vischer, Anne-Fleur W.K. & Knorth, Erik J. & Grietens, Hans & Post, Wendy J., 2019. "To preserve or not to preserve: That is the question. Decision-making about family preservation among families in multi-problem situations," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 441-450.
    2. Gibson, Matthew, 2016. "Constructing pride, shame, and humiliation as a mechanism of control: A case study of an English local authority child protection service," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 120-128.
    3. Bagdasaryan, Sofya, 2005. "Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question of effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 615-635, June.
    4. Littell, Julia H., 1997. "Effects of the duration, intensity, and breadth of family preservation services: A new analysis of data from the illinois family first experiment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 17-39.
    5. Doyle, Joseph J., 2013. "Causal effects of foster care: An instrumental-variables approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1143-1151.
    6. Nelson, Kristine E., 1997. "Family preservation--What is it?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 101-118.
    7. Maher, Erin J. & Marcynyszyn, Lyscha A. & Corwin, Tyler W. & Hodnett, Rhenda, 2011. "Dosage matters: The relationship between participation in the Nurturing Parenting Program for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers and subsequent child maltreatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1426-1434, August.
    8. Ryan, Joseph P. & Schuerman, John R., 2004. "Matching family problems with specific family preservation services: a study of service effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 347-372, April.
    9. Courtney, Mark E. & Hook, Jennifer L., 2012. "Evaluation of the impact of enhanced parental legal representation on the timing of permanency outcomes for children in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1337-1343.
    10. Moore, Kathleen & Sharp, Amanda & Alitz, Paige & Yampolskaya, Svetlana & Kleinman, Mary & Carlson, Melissa & Argerious, Alexa, 2020. "Reconsidering success for an integrated family dependency treatment court," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    11. Fernandez, Elizabeth & Delfabbro, Paul & Ramia, Ioana & Kovacs, Szilvia, 2019. "Children returning from care: The challenging circumstances of parents in poverty," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 100-111.
    12. Pine, Barbara A. & Spath, Robin & Werrbach, Gail B. & Jenson, Cary E. & Kerman, Benjamin, 2009. "A better path to permanency for children in out-of-home care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 1135-1143, October.
    13. Courtney, Mark E., 1997. "Reconsidering family preservation: A review of putting families first," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 61-76.
    14. Crea, Thomas M. & Usher, Charles L. & Wildfire, Judith B., 2009. "Implementation fidelity of Team Decisionmaking," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 119-124, January.
    15. Maluccio, Anthony N. & Whittaker, James K., 1997. "Learning from the "family preservation" initiative," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 5-16.
    16. Bloom, Martin, 1998. "Primary prevention and foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(8), pages 667-696, October.
    17. Waid, Jeffrey & Kothari, Brianne H. & Bank, Lew & McBeath, Bowen, 2016. "Foster care placement change: The role of family dynamics and household composition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 44-50.
    18. Wulczyn, Fred & Chen, Lijun & Courtney, Mark, 2011. "Family reunification in a social structural context," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 424-430, March.
    19. Landers, Ashley L. & Danes, Sharon M., 2016. "Forgotten children: A critical review of the reunification of American Indian children in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 137-147.
    20. Stahlschmidt, Mary Jo & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Pons, Laura & Constantino, John & Kohl, Patricia L. & Drake, Brett & Auslander, Wendy, 2018. "Trying to bridge the worlds of home visitation and child welfare: Lessons learned from a formative evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 133-140.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:20:y:1998:i:1-2:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.