IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v39y2015i4p428-446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity of the Parenting Stress Index Short Form in a Sample of At-Risk Mothers

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Pérez-Padilla
  • Susana Menéndez
  • Oscar Lozano

Abstract

Background: The Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI-SF) is a widely used instrument in scientific literature to evaluate the levels of stress a parent feels when facing parenting-related tasks. Despite the potential usefulness of the PSI-SF with at-risk families, no validation studies have been carried out on this population in Spain. Objectives: The main objective of this study is to report evidences of the reliability and validity of PSI-SF with a sample of at-risk mothers. Specifically, (1) to examine the discriminative capacity of PSI-SF to differentiate between a community sample and another sample composed of families with various levels of risk and (2) to analyze the relationships with general health indicators and parental sense of competence. Results: Analyses reported in this article show satisfactory results regarding appropriate internal consistency coefficients for the scale. With respect to the evidences of validity, results reported here suggest that the total PSI-SF score, but not the two subscales, could be useful to differentiate between different groups of mothers with different levels of risk. The Childrearing stress subscale was associated with a poorer perception as a mother as well as with an external locus of control, and the Personal distress subscale was related to all the general health indicators, explaining a high percentage of variance. Conclusion: The results reported show that the total score or the subscales should be used in a differentiated way according to the professional’s objectives. Hence, PSI-SF may be a useful instrument for researchers and practitioners who work with at-risk families.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Pérez-Padilla & Susana Menéndez & Oscar Lozano, 2015. "Validity of the Parenting Stress Index Short Form in a Sample of At-Risk Mothers," Evaluation Review, , vol. 39(4), pages 428-446, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:39:y:2015:i:4:p:428-446
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X15600859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X15600859
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X15600859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcynyszyn, Lyscha A. & Maher, Erin J. & Corwin, Tyler W., 2011. "Getting with the (evidence-based) program: An evaluation of the Incredible Years Parenting Training Program in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 747-757, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gubbels, Jeanne & Assink, Mark & Ravesteijn, Bastian & Weeland, Joyce & Chhangur, Rabia R. & Bouwmeester-Landweer, Merian & van den Heijkant, Silvia & van der Put, Claudia E., 2023. "Long-term collateral effects of parent programs on child maltreatment proxies: Can administrative data provide useful insights?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Karjalainen, Piia & Kiviruusu, Olli & Aronen, Eeva T. & Santalahti, Päivi, 2019. "Group-based parenting program to improve parenting and children's behavioral problems in families using special services: A randomized controlled trial in a real-life setting," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 420-429.
    3. Finders, Jennifer K. & Díaz, Guadalupe & Geldhof, G. John & Sektnan, Michaella & Rennekamp, Denise, 2016. "The impact of parenting education on parent and child behaviors: Moderators by income and ethnicity," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 199-209.
    4. Stahlschmidt, Mary Jo & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Pons, Laura & Constantino, John & Kohl, Patricia L. & Drake, Brett & Auslander, Wendy, 2018. "Trying to bridge the worlds of home visitation and child welfare: Lessons learned from a formative evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 133-140.
    5. Austin, Ashley & Craig, Shelley L. & Matarese, Marlene & Greeno, Elizabeth J. & Weeks, Angela & Betsinger, S. Aaron, 2021. "Preliminary effectiveness of an LGBTQ+ affirmative parenting intervention with foster parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    6. Sener, D. Konuk & Cimete, G., 2016. "A program based on Social Cognitive Theory and Smith's model of health and illness and its effect on maternal self-efficacy and child behavior," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 82-90.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:39:y:2015:i:4:p:428-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.