IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v23y2000i1p115-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating criminal justice programs designed to reduce crime by targeting repeat gang offenders

Author

Listed:
  • Kent, Douglas R.
  • Donaldson, Stewart I.
  • Wyrick, Phelan A.
  • Smith, Peggy J.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kent, Douglas R. & Donaldson, Stewart I. & Wyrick, Phelan A. & Smith, Peggy J., 2000. "Evaluating criminal justice programs designed to reduce crime by targeting repeat gang offenders," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 115-124, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:23:y:2000:i:1:p:115-124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(99)00039-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Costner, Herbert L., 1989. "The validity of conclusions in evaluation research: A further development of Chen and Rossi's theory-driven approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 345-353, January.
    2. Lipsey, Mark W. & Pollard, John A., 1989. "Driving toward theory in program evaluation: More models to choose from," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 317-328, January.
    3. Decker, Scott H. & Salert, Barbara, 1987. "Selective incapacitation: A note on its impact on minorities," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 287-299.
    4. Scott, Anne G. & Sechrest, Lee, 1989. "Strength of theory and theory of strength," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 329-336, January.
    5. Chen, Huey-Tsyh & Rossi, Peter H., 1987. "The theory-driven approach to validity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 95-103, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gravel, Jason & Bouchard, Martin & Descormiers, Karine & Wong, Jennifer S. & Morselli, Carlo, 2013. "Keeping promises: A systematic review and a new classification of gang control strategies," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 228-242.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harman, Elena & Azzam, Tarek, 2018. "Towards program theory validation: Crowdsourcing the qualitative analysis of participant experiences," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 183-194.
    2. Brousselle, Astrid & Champagne, François, 2011. "Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 69-78, February.
    3. Torvatn, Hans, 1999. "Using program theory models in evaluation of industrial modernization programs: three case studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 73-82.
    4. Gross, Revital & Rosen, Bruce & Chinitz, David, 1998. "Evaluating the Israeli health care reform: strategy, challenges and lessons," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 99-117, August.
    5. Benson, Paul R. & Fisher, Gene A. & Diana, Augusto & Simon, Lorna & Gamache, Gail & Tessler, Richard C. & McDermeit, Melissa, 1996. "A state network of family support services: The massachusetts family support demonstration project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 27-39, February.
    6. Michael L. Dennis, 1990. "Assessing the Validity of Randomized Field Experiments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 14(4), pages 347-373, August.
    7. Cooksy, Leslie J. & Gill, Paige & Kelly, P. Adam, 2001. "The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 119-128, May.
    8. Rodriguez, Eunice & Mead, June P., 1997. "Evaluating a community oriented primary care program: Lessons learned through a theory-oriented approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 217-224, May.
    9. Saxe, Leonard & Reber, Emily & Hallfors, Denise & Kadushin, Charles & Jones, Delmos & Rindskopf, David & Beveridge, Andrew, 1997. "Think globally, act locally: Assessing the impact of community-based substance abuse prevention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 357-366, August.
    10. Brendan Cushing-Daniels, 2005. "Even the errors discrimenate: How the split-population model of criminal recidivism makes justice even less colorblind," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 25-39, September.
    11. Johanna D. Birckmayer & Carol Hirschon Weiss, 2000. "Theory-Based Evaluation in Practice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 24(4), pages 407-431, August.
    12. Park, Chul Hyun & Welch, Eric W. & Sriraj, P.S., 2016. "An integrative theory-driven framework for evaluating travel training programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 7-20.
    13. Anthony Petrosino, 2000. "Mediators and Moderators in the Evaluation of Programs for Children," Evaluation Review, , vol. 24(1), pages 47-72, February.
    14. De Wit, David J. & Lipman, Ellen & Manzano-Munguia, Maria & Bisanz, Jeffrey & Graham, Kathryn & Offord, David R. & O'Neill, Elizabeth & Pepler, Deborah & Shaver, Karen, 2007. "Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial for evaluating the effectiveness of the Big Brothers Big Sisters community match program at the national level," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 383-404, March.
    15. Margarian, Anne, 2010. "Restrictions of empirical policy analyses: the example of the evaluation of rural development policies," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 95320, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Asghari, Shabnam & Heeley, Thomas & Bethune, Cheri & Graham, Wendy & MacLellan, Cameron & Button, Cathryn & Porter, Nicole & Parsons, Sandra, 2021. "Evaluation plan of the 6for6 research skills program for rural and remote physicians," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Geoffrey J. Syme & Brian S. Sadler, 1994. "Evaluation of Public Involvement in Water Resources Planning," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(5), pages 523-542, October.
    18. Kalpazidou Schmidt, Evanthia & Graversen, Ebbe Krogh, 2020. "Developing a conceptual evaluation framework for gender equality interventions in research and innovation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Victoria A. Johnson & Kevin R. Ronan & David M. Johnston & Robin Peace, 2016. "Improving the Impact and Implementation of Disaster Education: Programs for Children Through Theory‐Based Evaluation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(11), pages 2120-2135, November.
    20. Chris Melde & Finn-Aage Esbensen & Karin Tusinski, 2006. "Addressing Program Fidelity Using Onsite Observations and Program Provider Descriptions of Program Delivery," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(6), pages 714-740, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:23:y:2000:i:1:p:115-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.