IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v10y1987i1p95-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The theory-driven approach to validity

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Huey-Tsyh
  • Rossi, Peter H.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Huey-Tsyh & Rossi, Peter H., 1987. "The theory-driven approach to validity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 95-103, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:10:y:1987:i:1:p:95-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0149-7189(87)90025-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benson, Paul R. & Fisher, Gene A. & Diana, Augusto & Simon, Lorna & Gamache, Gail & Tessler, Richard C. & McDermeit, Melissa, 1996. "A state network of family support services: The massachusetts family support demonstration project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 27-39, February.
    2. Henning, Christian H.C.A. & Michalek, Jerzy, 2008. "Theoretische Grundlagen und die Rolle parametrischer bzw. nicht-parametrischer Modellansätze in der Politikevaluation Replik zu Anne Margarian, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, Braunschweig," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 57(07), pages 1-4.
    3. Kent, Douglas R. & Donaldson, Stewart I. & Wyrick, Phelan A. & Smith, Peggy J., 2000. "Evaluating criminal justice programs designed to reduce crime by targeting repeat gang offenders," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 115-124, February.
    4. Margarian, Anne, 2010. "Restrictions of empirical policy analyses: the example of the evaluation of rural development policies," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 95320, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Johanna D. Birckmayer & Carol Hirschon Weiss, 2000. "Theory-Based Evaluation in Practice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 24(4), pages 407-431, August.
    6. Taut, Sandy & Santelices, Verónica & Araya, Carolina & Manzi, Jorge, 2010. "Theory underlying a national teacher evaluation program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 477-486, November.
    7. Torvatn, Hans, 1999. "Using program theory models in evaluation of industrial modernization programs: three case studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 73-82.
    8. Downes, Jenni & Gullickson, Amy M., 2022. "What does it mean for an evaluation to be ‘valid’? A critical synthesis of evaluation literature," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Céline Mercier & Myra Piat & Normand Peladeau & Christian Dagenais, 2000. "An Application of Theory-Driven Evaluation to a Drop-In Youth Center," Evaluation Review, , vol. 24(1), pages 73-91, February.
    10. Harman, Elena & Azzam, Tarek, 2018. "Towards program theory validation: Crowdsourcing the qualitative analysis of participant experiences," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 183-194.
    11. Brousselle, Astrid & Champagne, François, 2011. "Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 69-78, February.
    12. Saxe, Leonard & Reber, Emily & Hallfors, Denise & Kadushin, Charles & Jones, Delmos & Rindskopf, David & Beveridge, Andrew, 1997. "Think globally, act locally: Assessing the impact of community-based substance abuse prevention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 357-366, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:10:y:1987:i:1:p:95-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.