IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v12y1989i4p345-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The validity of conclusions in evaluation research: A further development of Chen and Rossi's theory-driven approach

Author

Listed:
  • Costner, Herbert L.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Costner, Herbert L., 1989. "The validity of conclusions in evaluation research: A further development of Chen and Rossi's theory-driven approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 345-353, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:12:y:1989:i:4:p:345-353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0149-7189(89)90051-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kent, Douglas R. & Donaldson, Stewart I. & Wyrick, Phelan A. & Smith, Peggy J., 2000. "Evaluating criminal justice programs designed to reduce crime by targeting repeat gang offenders," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 115-124, February.
    2. De Wit, David J. & Lipman, Ellen & Manzano-Munguia, Maria & Bisanz, Jeffrey & Graham, Kathryn & Offord, David R. & O'Neill, Elizabeth & Pepler, Deborah & Shaver, Karen, 2007. "Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial for evaluating the effectiveness of the Big Brothers Big Sisters community match program at the national level," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 383-404, March.
    3. Gross, Revital & Rosen, Bruce & Chinitz, David, 1998. "Evaluating the Israeli health care reform: strategy, challenges and lessons," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 99-117, August.
    4. Harman, Elena & Azzam, Tarek, 2018. "Towards program theory validation: Crowdsourcing the qualitative analysis of participant experiences," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 183-194.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:12:y:1989:i:4:p:345-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.