IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v106y2024ics0149718924000697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating teacher competencies in Pakistan's public schools: Enhancing the impact of professional development programs

Author

Listed:
  • Kalim, Usama

Abstract

Professional Development (PD) programs in Pakistan typically follow a standardized approach, often overlooking the diverse strengths and weaknesses of various teacher groups, which may not adequately address their specific needs. This study aims to evaluate teacher competencies among different groups from the perspective of school principals in Pakistan's public schools, with the goal of enhancing the effectiveness of PD programs. Initially, the study identifies three key themes of 21st-century teacher competencies through an extensive review of recent literature. An interview guide, based on these competencies, was used to gather data from seven public school principals via structured interviews. The data were analyzed using a deductive content analysis approach, with MAXQDA software employed for theme coding. The findings revealed notable differences in teacher competencies from the principals' perspectives. Female and younger teachers exhibited more competencies compared to their male and senior counterparts. These insights provide crucial information for planning and customizing Teacher Professional Development (TPD) programs, emphasizing an objective evaluation of teachers rather than self-assessment. Tailored PD programs based on these findings can more effectively enhance teachers' professional growth and competence."

Suggested Citation

  • Kalim, Usama, 2024. "Evaluating teacher competencies in Pakistan's public schools: Enhancing the impact of professional development programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000697
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000697
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:106:y:2024:i:c:s0149718924000697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.