IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v79y2015icp455-466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental impact assessment of a solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined-heat-and-power-generation system

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Young Duk
  • Ahn, Kook Young
  • Morosuk, Tatiana
  • Tsatsaronis, George

Abstract

The environmental impact associated with a SOFC (solid-oxide fuel-cell) power generation system has been assessed using a LCA (life cycle assessment) method. LCA is a technique assessing the environmental aspects associated with a system during its entire life cycle. To calculate the environmental impact of the analyzed system, a commercial software package, SimaPro version 7.3.3., was used; the ReCiPe method, endpoint approach, and the hierarchist's perspective were selected for calculating the values. The calculation results reveal that the manufacturing stage and the disposal stage have small contributions to the total environmental impact, which just cover 2.1%–9.5% and 0.1%–0.6% of the total, respectively, depending on the assumption made for the lifetime of the SOFC stack and the overall system. The SOFC stack is a dominant contributor to the environmental impact associated with manufacturing; 72% of the total environmental impact of manufacturing comes from the SOFC stack; the remaining balance-of-plant (BOP) components account for 28% of the total environmental impact. Options for reducing the overall environmental impact are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2015. "Environmental impact assessment of a solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined-heat-and-power-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 455-466.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:79:y:2015:i:c:p:455-466
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214012900
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cabeza, Luisa F. & Rincón, Lídia & Vilariño, Virginia & Pérez, Gabriel & Castell, Albert, 2014. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 394-416.
    2. Hackney, Jeremy & de Neufville, Richard, 2001. "Life cycle model of alternative fuel vehicles: emissions, energy, and cost trade-offs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 243-266, March.
    3. Hamad, Tarek A. & Agll, Abdulhakim A. & Hamad, Yousif M. & Bapat, Sushrut & Thomas, Mathew & Martin, Kevin B. & Sheffield, John W., 2014. "Study of a molten carbonate fuel cell combined heat, hydrogen and power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 579-588.
    4. Kelly, K.A. & McManus, M.C. & Hammond, G.P., 2012. "An energy and carbon life cycle assessment of tidal power case study: The proposed Cardiff–Weston severn barrage scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 692-701.
    5. Santoyo-Castelazo, E. & Gujba, H. & Azapagic, A., 2011. "Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mexico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1488-1499.
    6. Raluy, Gemma & Serra, Luis & Uche, Javier, 2006. "Life cycle assessment of MSF, MED and RO desalination technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(13), pages 2361-2372.
    7. Wagner, Hermann-Josef & Baack, Christoph & Eickelkamp, Timo & Epe, Alexa & Lohmann, Jessica & Troy, Stefanie, 2011. "Life cycle assessment of the offshore wind farm alpha ventus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2459-2464.
    8. Strazza, C. & Del Borghi, A. & Costamagna, P. & Traverso, A. & Santin, M., 2010. "Comparative LCA of methanol-fuelled SOFCs as auxiliary power systems on-board ships," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(5), pages 1670-1678, May.
    9. Hong, Taehoon & Kim, Daeho & Koo, Choongwan & Kim, Jimin, 2014. "Framework for establishing the optimal implementation strategy of a fuel-cell-based combined heat and power system: Focused on multi-family housing complex," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 11-24.
    10. Kang, Sanggyu & Lee, Kanghun & Yu, Sangseok & Lee, Sang Min & Ahn, Kook-Young, 2014. "Development of a coupled reactor with a catalytic combustor and steam reformer for a 5kW solid oxide fuel cell system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 114-123.
    11. Poinssot, Ch. & Bourg, S. & Ouvrier, N. & Combernoux, N. & Rostaing, C. & Vargas-Gonzalez, M. & Bruno, J., 2014. "Assessment of the environmental footprint of nuclear energy systems. Comparison between closed and open fuel cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 199-211.
    12. Shafie, S.M. & Masjuki, H.H. & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2014. "Life cycle assessment of rice straw-based power generation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 401-410.
    13. Talens Peiró, L. & Lombardi, L. & Villalba Méndez, G. & Gabarrell i Durany, X., 2010. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) and exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA) of the production of biodiesel from used cooking oil (UCO)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 889-893.
    14. Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2011. "A comprehensive life cycle analysis of cofiring algae in a coal power plant as a solution for achieving sustainable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6352-6357.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Al-Khori, Khalid & Bicer, Yusuf & Koç, Muammer, 2021. "Comparative techno-economic assessment of integrated PV-SOFC and PV-Battery hybrid system for natural gas processing plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Christian Moretti & Blanca Corona & Viola Rühlin & Thomas Götz & Martin Junginger & Thomas Brunner & Ingwald Obernberger & Li Shen, 2020. "Combining Biomass Gasification and Solid Oxid Fuel Cell for Heat and Power Generation: An Early-Stage Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Cavalcanti, Eduardo José Cidade, 2017. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 507-519.
    4. Tanveer, Waqas Hassan & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Kolosz, Ben W. & Rezk, Hegazy & Andresen, John & Cha, Suk Won & Sayed, Enas Taha, 2021. "The role of vacuum based technologies in solid oxide fuel cell development to utilize industrial waste carbon for power production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Andika, Riezqa & Nandiyanto, Asep Bayu Dani & Putra, Zulfan Adi & Bilad, Muhammad Roil & Kim, Young & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2018. "Co-electrolysis for power-to-methanol applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 227-241.
    6. Zhao, Hongbin & Jiang, Ting & Hou, Hucan, 2015. "Performance analysis of the SOFC–CCHP system based on H2O/Li–Br absorption refrigeration cycle fueled by coke oven gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 983-993.
    7. Kotowicz, Janusz & Uchman, Wojciech, 2021. "Analysis of the integrated energy system in residential scale: Photovoltaics, micro-cogeneration and electrical energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    9. Garg, Akhil & Vijayaraghavan, Venkatesh & Zhang, Jian & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2017. "Robust model design for evaluation of power characteristics of the cleaner energy system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 302-313.
    10. Zheng, Nan & Zhang, Hanfei & Duan, Liqiang & Wang, Xiaomeng & Liu, Luyao, 2022. "Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of a novel partially covered parabolic trough photovoltaic thermal collector based on life cycle method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1573-1588.
    11. Zhu, Li & Chen, Junghui, 2018. "Prognostics of PEM fuel cells based on Gaussian process state space models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 63-73.
    12. Mehrabian, M.J. & Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H., 2023. "4E, risk, diagnosis, and availability evaluation for optimal design of a novel biomass-solar-wind driven polygeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    13. Mehmeti, Andi & McPhail, Stephen J. & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2018. "Life cycle inventory data and metrics for high-temperature fuel cells: A streamlined decision-support tool and case study application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1195-1205.
    14. Smith, Lucy & Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq & Yang, Fan & Reaney, Ian M. & Sinclair, Derek C. & Koh, S.C. Lenny, 2019. "Comparative environmental profile assessments of commercial and novel material structures for solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1300-1313.
    15. Amedi, Hamid Reza & Bazooyar, Bahamin & Pishvaie, Mahmoud Reza, 2015. "Control of anode supported SOFCs (solid oxide fuel cells): Part I. mathematical modeling and state estimation within one cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 605-621.
    16. Tonekabonimoghadam, S. & Akikur, R.K. & Hussain, M.A. & Hajimolana, S. & Saidur, R. & Ping, H.W. & Chakrabarti, M.H. & Brandon, N.P. & Aravind, P.V. & Nayagar, J.N.S. & Hashim, M.A., 2015. "Mathematical modelling and experimental validation of an anode-supported tubular solid oxide fuel cell for heat and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1759-1768.
    17. Ferreira, Victor J. & Wolff, Deidre & Hornés, Aitor & Morata, Alex & Torrell, M. & Tarancón, Albert & Corchero, Cristina, 2021. "5 kW SOFC stack via 3D printing manufacturing: An evaluation of potential environmental benefits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    18. Khani, Leyla & Mahmoudi, S. Mohammad S. & Chitsaz, Ata & Rosen, Marc A., 2016. "Energy and exergoeconomic evaluation of a new power/cooling cogeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 64-77.
    19. Kim, Young Sang & Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young, 2020. "System integration and proof-of-concept test results of SOFC–engine hybrid power generation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    20. Yang, Fei & Gu, Jianmin & Ye, Luhan & Zhang, Zuoxiang & Rao, Gaofeng & Liang, Yachun & Wen, Kechun & Zhao, Jiyun & Goodenough, John B. & He, Weidong, 2016. "Justifying the significance of Knudsen diffusion in solid oxide fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 242-246.
    21. Stropnik, R. & Sekavčnik, M. & Ferriz, A.M. & Mori, M., 2018. "Reducing environmental impacts of the ups system based on PEM fuel cell with circular economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 824-835.
    22. Ghorbani, Sh. & Khoshgoftar-Manesh, M.H. & Nourpour, M. & Blanco-Marigorta, A.M., 2020. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated SOFC-GT-ORC hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    23. Zheng, Nan & Zhang, Hanfei & Duan, Liqiang & Wang, Qiushi, 2023. "Comprehensive sustainability assessment of a novel solar-driven PEMEC-SOFC-based combined cooling, heating, power, and storage (CCHPS) system based on life cycle method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    24. Di Florio, Giuseppe & Macchi, Edoardo Gino & Mongibello, Luigi & Baratto, Maria Camilla & Basosi, Riccardo & Busi, Elena & Caliano, Martina & Cigolotti, Viviana & Testi, Matteo & Trini, Martina, 2021. "Comparative life cycle assessment of two different SOFC-based cogeneration systems with thermal energy storage integrated into a single-family house nanogrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger Samsó & Júlia Crespin & Antonio García-Olivares & Jordi Solé, 2023. "Examining the Potential of Marine Renewable Energy: A Net Energy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, May.
    2. Li, Xin & Ou, Xunmin & Zhang, Xu & Zhang, Qian & Zhang, Xiliang, 2013. "Life-cycle fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission intensity of dominant secondary energy pathways of China in 2010," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 15-23.
    3. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2014. "Global warming impact assessment of a crop residue gasification project—A dynamic LCA perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 269-279.
    4. Nian, Victor & Liu, Yang & Zhong, Sheng, 2019. "Life cycle cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy under the climatic conditions in Southeast Asia – Setting the bottom-line for deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1003-1014.
    5. Varun, & Prakash, Ravi & Bhat, I.K., 2012. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions estimation for small hydropower schemes in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 498-508.
    6. Polverino, Pierpaolo & Sorrentino, Marco & Pianese, Cesare, 2017. "A model-based diagnostic technique to enhance faults isolability in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1198-1214.
    7. Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas & Luis M. López-González & César García-Lozano, 2020. "Energy Renovation of Residential Buildings in Cold Mediterranean Zones Using Optimized Thermal Envelope Insulation Thicknesses: The Case of Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-34, March.
    8. Patricia González-Vallejo & Radu Muntean & Jaime Solís-Guzmán & Madelyn Marrero, 2020. "Carbon Footprint of Dwelling Construction in Romania and Spain. A Comparative Analysis with the OERCO2 Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    10. Zhao, Xiaoli & Cai, Qiong & Zhang, Sufang & Luo, Kaiyan, 2017. "The substitution of wind power for coal-fired power to realize China's CO2 emissions reduction targets in 2020 and 2030," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 164-178.
    11. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2015. "Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 36-49.
    12. Jin-Young Park & Byung-Soo Kim & Dong-Eun Lee, 2021. "Environmental and Cost Impact Assessment of Pavement Materials Using IBEES Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Dzikuć Maciej, 2015. "Environmental management with the use of LCA in the Polish energy system," Management, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 89-97, May.
    14. Qianqian Zhao & Junzhen Li & Roman Fediuk & Sergey Klyuev & Darya Nemova, 2021. "Benefit Evaluation Model of Prefabricated Buildings in Seasonally Frozen Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Zhang, Xiaoyue & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Li, Kailong, 2022. "Development of a stochastic multistage lifecycle programming model for electric power system planning – A case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Rueda-Bayona, Juan Gabriel & Cabello Eras, Juan Jose & Chaparro, Tatiana R., 2022. "Impacts generated by the materials used in offshore wind technology on Human Health, Natural Environment and Resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    17. Chau, C.K. & Xu, J.M. & Leung, T.M. & Ng, W.Y., 2017. "Evaluation of the impacts of end-of-life management strategies for deconstruction of a high-rise concrete framed office building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1595-1603.
    18. Ana Ferreira & Manuel Duarte Pinheiro & Jorge de Brito & Ricardo Mateus, 2022. "Embodied vs. Operational Energy and Carbon in Retail Building Shells: A Case Study in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Kong, Minjin & Lee, Minhyun & Kang, Hyuna & Hong, Taehoon, 2021. "Development of a framework for evaluating the contents and usability of the building life cycle assessment tool," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    20. Jiang, Dongyue & Yang, Wenming & Tang, Aikun, 2016. "A refractory selective solar absorber for high performance thermochemical steam reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 286-292.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:79:y:2015:i:c:p:455-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.