IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v36y2011i5p3572-3578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection and evaluation of biofilm carrier in anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure

Author

Listed:
  • Gong, Wei-jia
  • Liang, Heng
  • Li, Wen-zhe
  • Wang, Zhen-zhen

Abstract

Selection and evaluation of biofilm carrier represent the two significant ways for improving the anaerobic digesters. This study investigated the performances of the AD (anaerobic digestion) reactors using three types of fibrous biofilm carriers, including the ACF (activated carbon fiber), the PVAF (polyvinyl alcohol fiber) and the GF (glass fiber). The biogas and methane production, pH, COD (chemical oxygen demand), TS (total solids), VS (volatile solids), residual coenzyme F420 as well as the residual amount of methanogen were measured periodically during the experimental run. Also, the SEM (scanning electron microscopy) was used to identify the microbial consortium and their attachments onto the surface of ACF carrier. The ACF carrier performed better than the other two types of carriers in achieving higher amount of biogas and methane production and pollutants’ removal. The experimental results also demonstrated that the ACF carrier could make the reactor keep higher biogas and methane productions than the control blank reactor during the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Gong, Wei-jia & Liang, Heng & Li, Wen-zhe & Wang, Zhen-zhen, 2011. "Selection and evaluation of biofilm carrier in anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3572-3578.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:5:p:3572-3578
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544211002362
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsai, Wen-Tien & Lin, Che-I, 2009. "Overview analysis of bioenergy from livestock manure management in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2682-2688, December.
    2. Rafique, Rashad & Poulsen, Tjalfe Gorm & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Asam, Zaki-ul-Zaman & Murphy, Jerry D. & Kiely, Gerard, 2010. "Effect of thermal, chemical and thermo-chemical pre-treatments to enhance methane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4556-4561.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yao, Yiqing & Yu, Liang & Ghogare, Rishikesh & Dunsmoor, Alexander & Davaritouchaee, Maryam & Chen, Shulin, 2017. "Simultaneous ammonia stripping and anaerobic digestion for efficient thermophilic conversion of dairy manure at high solids concentration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 179-188.
    2. Paliwal, Aastha & Srinivas, Arpitha & Pauls, Glen & B.G, Namratha & Reddy, Rohitha & S, Dasappa & H.N., Chanakya, 2023. "Methanogen colonization and ‘end-of-life’ use of spent lignocellulose from a solid-state reactor as an inoculum source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    3. Yao, Yiqing & Sheng, Hongmei & Luo, Yang & He, Mulan & Li, Xiangkai & Zhang, Hua & He, Wenliang & An, Lizhe, 2014. "Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of Solidago canadensis L. biomass and cattle slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-127.
    4. Yao, Yiqing & Zhou, Jianye & An, Lizhe & Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Chen, Shulin & Qiu, Ling, 2018. "Role of soil in improving process performance and methane yield of anaerobic digestion with corn straw as substrate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 998-1006.
    5. Sánchez-Sánchez, Consolación & González-González, Almudena & Cuadros-Salcedo, Francisco & Gómez-Serrano, Vicente & Cuadros-Blázquez, Francisco, 2019. "Charcoal as a bacteriological adherent for biomethanation of organic wastes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 336-342.
    6. Mosleh Uddin, Md & Wen, Zhiyou & Mba Wright, Mark, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of using corn stover biochar for manure derived renewable natural gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    7. Amina Mohamed Ali & Md Alam Zahangir & Fatouma Mohamed Abdoul-Latif & Mohammed Saedi Jami & Jalludin Mohamed & Tarik Ainane, 2023. "Hydrolysis of Food Waste with Immobilized Biofilm as a Pretreatment Method for the Enhancement of Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Tassou, Savvas A. & Florides, Georgios, 2012. "An assessment of the biomass potential of Cyprus for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 253-261.
    9. Coultry, James & Walsh, Eilín & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Energy and economic implications of anaerobic digestion pasteurisation regulations in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 125-128.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ni, Ji-Qin, 2024. "A review of household and industrial anaerobic digestion in Asia: Biogas development and safety incidents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Grim, Johanna & Malmros, Peter & Schnürer, Anna & Nordberg, Åke, 2015. "Comparison of pasteurization and integrated thermophilic sanitation at a full-scale biogas plant – Heat demand and biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 419-427.
    3. Ormaechea, P. & Castrillón, L. & Suárez-Peña, B. & Megido, L. & Fernández-Nava, Y. & Negral, L. & Marañón, E. & Rodríguez-Iglesias, J., 2018. "Enhancement of biogas production from cattle manure pretreated and/or co-digested at pilot-plant scale. Characterization by SEM," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 897-904.
    4. Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Tassou, Savvas A. & Florides, Georgios, 2012. "An assessment of the biomass potential of Cyprus for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 253-261.
    5. Vats, Neelam & Khan, Abid Ali & Ahmad, Kafeel, 2019. "Observation of biogas production by sugarcane bagasse and food waste in different composition combinations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1100-1105.
    6. Lee, Tsung-Han & Huang, Sheng-Rung & Chen, Chiun-Hsun, 2013. "The experimental study on biogas power generation enhanced by using waste heat to preheat inlet gases," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 342-347.
    7. Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen, 2016. "Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 429-438.
    8. Long, Huiling & Li, Xiaobing & Wang, Hong & Jia, Jingdun, 2013. "Biomass resources and their bioenergy potential estimation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 344-352.
    9. Seyed Abbas Radmard & Hossein Haji Agha Alizadeh & Rahman Seifi, 2018. "Enhancement anaerobic digestion and methane production from kitchen waste by thermal and thermo-chemical pretreatments in batch leach bed reactor with down flow," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(3), pages 128-135.
    10. Azman, Samet & Milh, Hannah & Somers, Matthijs H. & Zhang, Huili & Huybrechts, Ine & Meers, Erik & Meesschaert, Boudewijn & Dewil, Raf & Appels, Lise, 2020. "Ultrasound-assisted digestate treatment of manure digestate for increased biogas production in small pilot scale anaerobic digesters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 664-673.
    11. Wen-Tien Tsai, 2014. "Innovative Promotion of Renewable Energy Development for Challenging Sustainable Low-Carbon Society: Case Study of Pingtung County, Taiwan," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, January.
    12. Jain, Siddharth & Jain, Shivani & Wolf, Ingo Tim & Lee, Jonathan & Tong, Yen Wah, 2015. "A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 142-154.
    13. Nizami, A.S. & Orozco, A. & Groom, E. & Dieterich, B. & Murphy, J.D., 2012. "How much gas can we get from grass?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 783-790.
    14. Theofanous, Elisavet & Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Panayiotou, Gregoris & Florides, Georgios & Vyrides, Ioannis, 2014. "Energy production from piggery waste using anaerobic digestion: Current status and potential in Cyprus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 263-270.
    15. Kamil Witaszek & Krzysztof Pilarski & Gniewko Niedbała & Agnieszka Anna Pilarska & Marcin Herkowiak, 2020. "Energy Efficiency of Comminution and Extrusion of Maize Substrates Subjected to Methane Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Zhang, Yuejin & Bao, Keting & Wang, Juan & Zhao, Yongjun & Hu, Changwei, 2017. "Performance of mixed LED light wavelengths on nutrient removal and biogas upgrading by different microalgal-based treatment technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 392-401.
    17. Elsamadony, M. & Tawfik, A. & Suzuki, M., 2015. "Surfactant-enhanced biohydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) via dry anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 272-282.
    18. Meneses-Quelal Orlando & Velázquez-Martí Borja, 2020. "Pretreatment of Animal Manure Biomass to Improve Biogas Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    19. Li, C. & Champagne, P. & Anderson, B.C., 2015. "Enhanced biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of municipal wastewater treatment sludge and fat, oil and grease (FOG) by a modified two-stage thermophilic digester system with selected thermo-," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 474-482.
    20. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:5:p:3572-3578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.