IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3316-d1065076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydrolysis of Food Waste with Immobilized Biofilm as a Pretreatment Method for the Enhancement of Biogas Production

Author

Listed:
  • Amina Mohamed Ali

    (Medicinal Research Institute, Centre d’Etudes et de Recherche de Djibouti, IRM-CERD, Route de l’Aéroport, Haramous B.P. 486, Djibouti City 77101, Djibouti
    Bioenvironmental Engineering Research Centre, Department of Chemical Engineering and Sustainability, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 53100, Malaysia)

  • Md Alam Zahangir

    (Bioenvironmental Engineering Research Centre, Department of Chemical Engineering and Sustainability, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 53100, Malaysia)

  • Fatouma Mohamed Abdoul-Latif

    (Medicinal Research Institute, Centre d’Etudes et de Recherche de Djibouti, IRM-CERD, Route de l’Aéroport, Haramous B.P. 486, Djibouti City 77101, Djibouti)

  • Mohammed Saedi Jami

    (Bioenvironmental Engineering Research Centre, Department of Chemical Engineering and Sustainability, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 53100, Malaysia)

  • Jalludin Mohamed

    (Medicinal Research Institute, Centre d’Etudes et de Recherche de Djibouti, IRM-CERD, Route de l’Aéroport, Haramous B.P. 486, Djibouti City 77101, Djibouti)

  • Tarik Ainane

    (Superior School of Technology of Khenifra, University of Sultan Moulay Slimane, BP 170, Khenifra 54000, Morocco)

Abstract

The present study shows the opportunity of using biofilm in the hydrolysis step of food waste (FW) to increase biogas production. Therefore, screened biofilm-producing microorganisms were adopted to facilitate the biodegradation of organic compounds (OCs) and enhance the volume of biogas production. The biofilm-producing microorganisms were first immobilized on a granular activated carbon (GAC) surface, and the optimum values of immobilization time, mass of the GAC surface, and size of the microbial inoculums were found using the statistical methods of one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) and the response surface methodology (RSM) using a face-centered central composite design (FCCCD). Based on the results, 48 h of incubation, 8 g of GAC, and 1 mL of inoculum were the optimum conditions when shaken at 37 °C and 150 rpm. Different biofilm amounts (328 mg, 492 mg, 656 mg, 820 mg, and 984 mg) were used in hydrolysis flasks operated in batch mode to increase the degradation of the OCs. The optimal level of the hydrolysis degradation was on day 3 and at 328 mg of biofilm; the total solid (TS) content was decreased from 115 gL −1 to 79 gL −1 (31%), and the TCOD was decreased from 85.33 gL −1 to 54.50 gL −1 (36%).

Suggested Citation

  • Amina Mohamed Ali & Md Alam Zahangir & Fatouma Mohamed Abdoul-Latif & Mohammed Saedi Jami & Jalludin Mohamed & Tarik Ainane, 2023. "Hydrolysis of Food Waste with Immobilized Biofilm as a Pretreatment Method for the Enhancement of Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3316-:d:1065076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3316/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3316/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagih Salama & Essam Abdelsalam, 2021. "Impact of Hotel Guests’ Trends to Recycle Food Waste to Obtain Bioenergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Gong, Wei-jia & Liang, Heng & Li, Wen-zhe & Wang, Zhen-zhen, 2011. "Selection and evaluation of biofilm carrier in anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3572-3578.
    3. KeChrist Obileke & Nwabunwanne Nwokolo & Golden Makaka & Patrick Mukumba & Helen Onyeaka, 2021. "Anaerobic digestion: Technology for biogas production as a source of renewable energy—A review," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(2), pages 191-225, March.
    4. Mariana Ferdeș & Bianca Ștefania Zăbavă & Gigel Paraschiv & Mariana Ionescu & Mirela Nicoleta Dincă & Georgiana Moiceanu, 2022. "Food Waste Management for Biogas Production in the Context of Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Tian, Hailin & Wang, Xiaonan & Lim, Ee Yang & Lee, Jonathan T.E. & Ee, Alvin W.L. & Zhang, Jingxin & Tong, Yen Wah, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of food waste to energy and resources: Centralized and decentralized anaerobic digestion with different downstream biogas utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Aakash Khadka & Anmol Parajuli & Sheila Dangol & Bijay Thapa & Lokesh Sapkota & Alessandro A. Carmona-Martínez & Anish Ghimire, 2022. "Effect of the Substrate to Inoculum Ratios on the Kinetics of Biogas Production during the Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ephodia Sihlangu & Dibungi Luseba & Thierry Regnier & Primrose Magama & Idan Chiyanzu & Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe, 2024. "Investigating Methane, Carbon Dioxide, Ammonia, and Hydrogen Sulphide Content in Agricultural Waste during Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.
    2. David Fernández-Gutiérrez & Alejandra Argüelles & Gemma Castejón Martínez & José M. Soriano Disla & Andrés J. Lara-Guillén, 2022. "Unlocking New Value from Urban Biowaste: LCA of the VALUEWASTE Biobased Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Tomasz Kulupa & Adrianna Kubiak & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Krzysztof Pilarski & Alicja Niewiadomska, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste—A Short Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Coultry, James & Walsh, Eilín & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Energy and economic implications of anaerobic digestion pasteurisation regulations in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 125-128.
    5. Mohamed Ahmed Suliman & Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Moatazbellah Farid Ibrahim & Dayal Ali Waheer Al-Khaldy & Ashraf Mohamed Anas & Wael Mohamed Mahmoud Alrefae & Wagih Salama, 2023. "Impact of Green Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Environmental Performance in the Hotel Industry Context: Does Green Work Engagement Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Yao, Yiqing & Sheng, Hongmei & Luo, Yang & He, Mulan & Li, Xiangkai & Zhang, Hua & He, Wenliang & An, Lizhe, 2014. "Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of Solidago canadensis L. biomass and cattle slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-127.
    7. Tsui, To-Hung & Zhang, Le & Zhang, Jingxin & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2022. "Engineering interface between bioenergy recovery and biogas desulfurization: Sustainability interplays of biochar application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Alessandro A. Carmona-Martínez & Carmen Bartolomé & Clara A. Jarauta-Córdoba, 2023. "The Role of Biogas and Biomethane as Renewable Gases in the Decarbonization Pathway to Zero Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-3, August.
    9. Shitophyta Lukhi Mulia & Arnita Arnita & Wulansari Hilda Dyah Ana, 2023. "Evaluation and modelling of biogas production from batch anaerobic digestion of corn stover with oxalic acid," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(3), pages 151-157.
    10. Amal Babu Puthumana & Prasad Kaparaju, 2024. "Impact of Organic Load on Methane Yields and Kinetics during Anaerobic Digestion of Sugarcane Bagasse: Optimal Feed-to-Inoculum Ratio and Total Solids of Reactor Working Volume," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Deng, Yawen & Ng Tsan Sheng, Adam & Xu, Jiuping, 2023. "Authority-enterprise equilibrium based mixed subsidy mechanism for the value-added treatment of food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Ombretta Paladino, 2022. "Data Driven Modelling and Control Strategies to Improve Biogas Quality and Production from High Solids Anaerobic Digestion: A Mini Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Tassou, Savvas A. & Florides, Georgios, 2012. "An assessment of the biomass potential of Cyprus for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 253-261.
    14. Mosleh Uddin, Md & Wen, Zhiyou & Mba Wright, Mark, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of using corn stover biochar for manure derived renewable natural gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    15. Mathilde van Dijk & Annet-Jantien Smit & Jan-Peter Nap, 2023. "Message Framing and Attitudes Toward Green Gas Facilities in Rural Communities of The Netherlands," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    16. Siti Norliyana Harun & Marlia Mohd Hanafiah & Noorashikin Md Noor, 2022. "Rice Straw Utilisation for Bioenergy Production: A Brief Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Parralejo Alcobendas Ana Isabel & Royano Barroso Luis & Cabanillas Patilla Juan & González Cortés Jerónimo, 2022. "Biogas from Nitrogen-Rich Biomass as an Alternative to Animal Manure Co-Substrate in Anaerobic Co-Digestion Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Izabela Samson-Bręk & Marlena Owczuk & Anna Matuszewska & Krzysztof Biernat, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of the Life Cycle of Electricity Generation from Biogas in Polish Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Sánchez-Sánchez, Consolación & González-González, Almudena & Cuadros-Salcedo, Francisco & Gómez-Serrano, Vicente & Cuadros-Blázquez, Francisco, 2019. "Charcoal as a bacteriological adherent for biomethanation of organic wastes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 336-342.
    20. Eftychia Ntostoglou & Dilip Khatiwada & Viktoria Martin, 2021. "The Potential Contribution of Decentralized Anaerobic Digestion towards Urban Biowaste Recovery Systems: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3316-:d:1065076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.