IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v308y2024ics0360544224027269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of multilevel cascade layouts to improve performance of SCO2 Brayton power cycles: Design, simulation, and optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Jiaxin
  • Zhao, Bingtao
  • Su, Yaxin

Abstract

The multilevel cascade SCO2 Brayton cycles are developed based on the conventional recompression-reheat cycle to enhance thermodynamic performances using the multilevel cascade scheme. Mathematical models are proposed to characterize their thermal cycle efficiency. The results show that for three typical cases, the proposed multilevel cascade cycle with 3 compressors × 3 reheats × 2 turbines improve cycle efficiency by 2.56 %, 3.17 %, and 3.44 % in absolute change, while the other with 3 compressors × 3 reheats × 3 turbines further enhance by 3.17 %, 4.19 %, and 4.17 % in absolute change over the conventional cycle. The latter cycle as the optimal layout is chosen to perform the key parametric analysis. The cycle efficiency increases with increasing high-pressure turbine inlet temperature, while the main compressor inlet temperature has the opposite effect. It increases and then decreases with the high-pressure turbine inlet pressure, the main compressor inlet pressure, and the split ratio of the recompressor, respectively. Finally, the parametric global optimization is conducted to improve the cycle performance more deeply. It is demonstrated that the absolute efficiency can be further increased by 2.62 %, 1.81 %, and 1.09 % for the responding cases. The integrated configurations are also suggested for power generation systems with different applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Jiaxin & Zhao, Bingtao & Su, Yaxin, 2024. "Development of multilevel cascade layouts to improve performance of SCO2 Brayton power cycles: Design, simulation, and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224027269
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224027269
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin, Qinglong & Xia, Shaojun & Chen, Lingen, 2023. "A modified recompression S–CO2 Brayton cycle and its thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    2. Park, Joo Hyun & Park, Hyun Sun & Kwon, Jin Gyu & Kim, Tae Ho & Kim, Moo Hwan, 2018. "Optimization and thermodynamic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton recompression cycle for various small modular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 520-535.
    3. Zhao, Bingtao & Yao, Jiacheng & Su, Yaxin, 2023. "Performance response to operating-load fluctuations for Sub-megawatt-scale recuperated supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles: Characteristics and improvement," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 686-693.
    4. Wang, Rui & Wang, Xuan & Bian, Xingyan & Zhang, Xuanang & Cai, Jinwen & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn & Wang, Mingtao, 2023. "An optimal split ratio in design and control of a recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Yu Qiu & Erqi E & Qing Li, 2023. "Triple-Objective Optimization of SCO 2 Brayton Cycles for Next-Generation Solar Power Tower," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Bai, Ziwei & Zhang, Guoqiang & Li, Yongyi & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "A supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with a bleeding anabranch used in coal-fired power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 731-738.
    7. Cheng, Kunlin & Qin, Jiang & Sun, Hongchuang & Li, Heng & He, Shuai & Zhang, Silong & Bao, Wen, 2019. "Power optimization and comparison between simple recuperated and recompressing supercritical carbon dioxide Closed-Brayton-Cycle with finite cold source on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1189-1201.
    8. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2017. "Integration between supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles and molten salt solar power towers: A review and a comprehensive comparison of different cycle layouts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 819-836.
    9. Zhu, Han-Hui & Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and comparison for different direct-heated supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated into a solar thermal power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 144-157.
    10. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    11. Santini, Lorenzo & Accornero, Carlo & Cioncolini, Andrea, 2016. "On the adoption of carbon dioxide thermodynamic cycles for nuclear power conversion: A case study applied to Mochovce 3 Nuclear Power Plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 446-463.
    12. Iverson, Brian D. & Conboy, Thomas M. & Pasch, James J. & Kruizenga, Alan M., 2013. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 957-970.
    13. S. Mohammad S. Mahmoudi & Ata D. Akbari & Marc A. Rosen, 2016. "Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a New Combined Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Brayton/Kalina Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Mecheri, Mounir & Le Moullec, Yann, 2016. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for coal-fired power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 758-771.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Sunjin & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2020. "Parametric study and optimization of closed Brayton power cycle considering the charge amount of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Ma, Teng & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Cao, Feng, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis and performance prediction on dynamic response characteristic of PCHE in 1000 MW S-CO2 coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 123-138.
    3. Yao, Lichao & Zou, Zhengping, 2020. "A one-dimensional design methodology for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles: Integration of cycle conceptual design and components preliminary design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    5. Kunniyoor, Vijayaraj & Singh, Punit & Nadella, Karthik, 2020. "Value of closed-cycle gas turbines with design assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    7. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    8. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.
    9. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    10. Tong, Yongjing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Ming & Pang, Liping, 2022. "Design optimization of a new supercritical CO2 single reheat coal-fired power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Alsawy, Tariq & Elsayed, Mohamed L. & Mohammed, Ramy H. & Mesalhy, Osama, 2024. "Accuracy assessment of the turbomachinery performance maps correction models used in dynamic characteristics of supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    12. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Kelsall, Greg, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and preliminary design of closed Brayton cycle using nitrogen as working fluid and coupled to small modular Sodium-cooled fast reactor (SM-SFR)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 436-453.
    13. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    14. Binotti, Marco & Astolfi, Marco & Campanari, Stefano & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Silva, Paolo, 2017. "Preliminary assessment of sCO2 cycles for power generation in CSP solar tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1007-1017.
    15. Merchán, R.P. & Santos, M.J. & Medina, A. & Calvo Hernández, A., 2022. "High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    16. Aofang Yu & Wen Su & Li Zhao & Xinxing Lin & Naijun Zhou, 2020. "New Knowledge on the Performance of Supercritical Brayton Cycle with CO 2 -Based Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Luo, Qianqian & Li, Xingchen & Luo, Lei & Du, Wei & Yan, Han, 2024. "Multi-objective performance analysis of different SCO2 Brayton cycles on hypersonic vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    19. Xu, Cheng & Zhang, Qiang & Yang, Zhiping & Li, Xiaosa & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "An improved supercritical coal-fired power generation system incorporating a supplementary supercritical CO2 cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1319-1329.
    20. Saeed, Muhammad & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2022. "A newly proposed supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle configuration to enhance energy sources integration capability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:308:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224027269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.