IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v306y2024ics0360544224022138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-criteria compromise ranking decision-making approach for analysis and evaluation of community-integrated energy service system

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Qing
  • Liu, Minzhe

Abstract

With the acceleration in industrialisation and urbanisation, building a community-integrated energy service system that includes renewable energy is an effective way to resolve energy shortages and reduce environmental pollution. Energy coupling can be realised using technology, such as electricity-to-gas conversion equipment, gas turbines, and gas boilers. And a carbon-trading mechanism can be introduced to build a community-integrated energy service system. First, the composition and characteristics of the community-integrated energy service system are analysed, and an index evaluation model for the community-integrated energy system is constructed considering the four influencing factors of cost, reliability, energy consumption, and environmental protection. The weight assigned to each indicator is determined based on the binary comparison weighting method and the improved criteria importance though intercrieria correlation method, and a multi-criteria compromise ranking evaluation system is established. A community was selected as an example of sensitivity and comparative analysis to verify the correctness and rationality of evaluating a community-integrated energy service system using the multi-criteria compromise ranking evaluation system based on the binary comparison weighting method and the improved criteria importance though intercrieria correlation method.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Qing & Liu, Minzhe, 2024. "A multi-criteria compromise ranking decision-making approach for analysis and evaluation of community-integrated energy service system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:306:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224022138
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.132439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224022138
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Kun & Ding, Yan & Zhu, Neng & Yang, Fan & Wang, Qiaochu, 2018. "Multi-criteria integrated evaluation of distributed energy system for community energy planning based on improved grey incidence approach: A case study in Tianjin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 352-363.
    2. Katal, Fatemeh & Fazelpour, Farivar, 2018. "Multi-criteria evaluation and priority analysis of different types of existing power plants in Iran: An optimized energy planning system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 163-177.
    3. Lund, Henrik & Hvelplund, Frede & Ingermann, Karl & Kask, Ulo, 2000. "Estonian energy system Proposals for the implementation of a cogeneration strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(10), pages 729-736, August.
    4. Cong, Di & Liang, Lingling & Jing, Shaoxing & Han, Yongming & Geng, Zhiqiang & Chu, Chong, 2021. "Energy supply efficiency evaluation of integrated energy systems using novel SBM-DEA integrating Monte Carlo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Lund, Henrik & Munster, Ebbe, 2006. "Integrated energy systems and local energy markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1152-1160, July.
    6. Ren, Hongbo & Gao, Weijun & Zhou, Weisheng & Nakagami, Ken'ichi, 2009. "Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5484-5493, December.
    7. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhang, Xu-Tao & Shi, Guo-Hua, 2008. "Integrated evaluation of distributed triple-generation systems using improved grey incidence approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1427-1437.
    8. Sarabia Escriva, Emilio José & Hart, Matthew & Acha, Salvador & Soto Francés, Víctor & Shah, Nilay & Markides, Christos N., 2022. "Techno-economic evaluation of integrated energy systems for heat recovery applications in food retail buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Yuan, Chaoqing & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng, 2016. "Comparison of China's primary energy consumption forecasting by using ARIMA (the autoregressive integrated moving average) model and GM(1,1) model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 384-390.
    10. Wang, Rutian & Wen, Xiangyun & Wang, Xiuyun & Fu, Yanbo & Zhang, Yu, 2022. "Low carbon optimal operation of integrated energy system based on carbon capture technology, LCA carbon emissions and ladder-type carbon trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    11. Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui & Li, Ke & Liu, Shuai & Li, Shuzhen & Wang, Yu, 2021. "Distributed coordinative transaction of a community integrated energy system based on a tri-level game model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    12. Jing, You-Yin & Bai, He & Wang, Jiang-Jiang, 2012. "Multi-objective optimization design and operation strategy analysis of BCHP system based on life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 405-416.
    13. Yuan, Jiahang & Luo, Xinggang & Li, Yun & Hu, Xiaoqing & Chen, Wenchong & Zhang, Yue, 2022. "Multi criteria decision-making for distributed energy system based on multi-source heterogeneous data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    14. Wang, Jiangjiang & Yang, Ying & Mao, Tianzhi & Sui, Jun & Jin, Hongguang, 2015. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) optimization of solar-assisted hybrid CCHP system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 38-52.
    15. Jing, Rui & Wang, Meng & Brandon, Nigel & Zhao, Yingru, 2017. "Multi-criteria evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell based combined cooling heating and power (SOFC-CCHP) applications for public buildings in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 273-289.
    16. Qu, Kaiping & Yu, Tao & Huang, Linni & Yang, Bo & Zhang, Xiaoshun, 2018. "Decentralized optimal multi-energy flow of large-scale integrated energy systems in a carbon trading market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 779-791.
    17. Kumar, Abhishek & Sah, Bikash & Singh, Arvind R. & Deng, Yan & He, Xiangning & Kumar, Praveen & Bansal, R.C., 2017. "A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 596-609.
    18. Fu, Xueqian & Guo, Qinglai & Sun, Hongbin & Zhang, Xiurong & Wang, Li, 2017. "Estimation of the failure probability of an integrated energy system based on the first order reliability method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1068-1078.
    19. Chatzimouratidis, Athanasios I. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2009. "Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 778-787, March.
    20. Koirala, Binod Prasad & Koliou, Elta & Friege, Jonas & Hakvoort, Rudi A. & Herder, Paulien M., 2016. "Energetic communities for community energy: A review of key issues and trends shaping integrated community energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 722-744.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Kun & Ding, Yan & Zhu, Neng & Yang, Fan & Wang, Qiaochu, 2018. "Multi-criteria integrated evaluation of distributed energy system for community energy planning based on improved grey incidence approach: A case study in Tianjin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 352-363.
    2. Zhu, Mengshu & Fang, Jiakun & Ai, Xiaomeng & Cui, Shichang & Feng, Yuang & Li, Peng & Zhang, Yihan & Zheng, Yongle & Chen, Zhe & Wen, Jinyu, 2023. "A comprehensive methodology for optimal planning of remote integrated energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    3. Wanyu Wang & Haochen Li & Xueliang Hou & Qian Zhang & Songfeng Tian, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Distributed Energy System Based on Order Relation-Anti-Entropy Weight Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Ye Li & Shixuan Li & Shiyao Xia & Bojia Li & Xinyu Zhang & Boyuan Wang & Tianzhen Ye & Wandong Zheng, 2023. "A Review on the Policy, Technology and Evaluation Method of Low-Carbon Buildings and Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-43, February.
    5. Qian, Jiaxin & Wu, Jiahui & Yao, Lei & Mahmut, Saniye & Zhang, Qiang, 2021. "Comprehensive performance evaluation of Wind-Solar-CCHP system based on emergy analysis and multi-objective decision method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    7. Dorokhov, V.V. & Kuznetsov, G.V. & Vershinina, K.Yu. & Strizhak, P.A., 2021. "Relative energy efficiency indicators calculated for high-moisture waste-based fuel blends using multiple-criteria decision-making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    8. Maarten Wolsink, 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
    9. Milad Kolagar & Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini & Ramin Felegari & Parviz Fattahi, 2020. "Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: a hybrid DEA-FBWM approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 485-509, December.
    10. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    11. Yang, Kun & Zhu, Neng & Chang, Chen & Wang, Daquan & Yang, Shan & Ma, Shengming, 2018. "A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM): A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1085-1096.
    12. Wang, Yongzhen & Zhang, Lanlan & Song, Yi & Han, Kai & Zhang, Yan & Zhu, Yilin & Kang, Ligai, 2024. "State-of-the-art review on evaluation indicators of integrated intelligent energy from different perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    13. Si, Pengfei & Feng, Ya & Lv, Yuexia & Rong, Xiangyang & Pan, Yungang & Liu, Xichen & Yan, Jinyue, 2017. "An optimization method applied to active solar energy systems for buildings in cold plateau areas – The case of Lhasa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 487-498.
    14. Yao, Wenliang & Wang, Chengfu & Yang, Ming & Wang, Kang & Dong, Xiaoming & Zhang, Zhenwei, 2023. "A tri-layer decision-making framework for IES considering the interaction of integrated demand response and multi-energy market clearing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    15. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Empirical investigation and validation of sustainability indicators for the assessment of energy sources in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Lund, Henrik & Duić, Neven & Krajac˘ić, Goran & Graça Carvalho, Maria da, 2007. "Two energy system analysis models: A comparison of methodologies and results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 948-954.
    17. Jing, Rui & Wang, Meng & Brandon, Nigel & Zhao, Yingru, 2017. "Multi-criteria evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell based combined cooling heating and power (SOFC-CCHP) applications for public buildings in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 273-289.
    18. Han, Jie & Ouyang, Leixin & Xu, Yuzhen & Zeng, Rong & Kang, Shushuo & Zhang, Guoqiang, 2016. "Current status of distributed energy system in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 288-297.
    19. Magdalena Krysiak & Aldona Kluczek, 2021. "A Multifaceted Challenge to Enhance Multicriteria Decision Support for Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Indre Siksnelyte & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Deepak Sharma, 2018. "An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Dealing with Sustainable Energy Development Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:306:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224022138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.