IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v281y2023ics036054422301722x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic performance of the fractionated auto-cascade refrigeration cycle coupled with two-phase ejector using R1150/R600a at −80 °C temperature level

Author

Listed:
  • Tan, Yingying
  • Li, Xiuzhen
  • Wang, Lin
  • Huang, Lisheng
  • Xiao, Yi
  • Wang, Zhanwei
  • Li, Shaoqiang

Abstract

The auto-cascade refrigeration cycle (ACRC) is suitable for low temperature refrigeration fields. From the perspective of fractionation purification matching expansion work recovery, a fractionated auto-cascade refrigeration cycle coupled with the two-phase ejector (FACRC-TPE) using environmentally-friendly R1150/R600a is proposed in this paper. In the novel cycle, the two-phase ejector is substituted for the throttle valve at the liquid stream passage from the separator bottom to recover expansion work and cut down the energy consumption, while the fractionation heat exchanger is applied for purification of low boiling point component in the vapor stream from the separator top to boost the cycle exergy efficiency and achieve a refrigeration temperature below −80 °C. The energetic and exergetic analysis methods are used to evaluate and compare the performances of the three cycles, and comparisons of superiority and irreversibility of FACRC-TPE are also made with the unfractionated auto-cascade refrigeration cycle with the two-phase ejector (UACRC-TPE) and the fractionated auto-cascade refrigeration cycle (FACRC). The results show that the cooperative application of the fractionation heat exchanger coupled with the two-phase ejector not only significantly boosts COP of FACRC-TPE and obtains lower refrigeration temperature, but also cuts down the total exergy loss of FACRC-TPE. With R1150 mass fraction varying in the range of 0.29–0.48, the average COP of FACRC-TPE is 10.57% higher than that of UACRC-TPE, and is 15.18% higher than that of FACRC, whereas FACRC-TPE has a lower evaporator inlet temperature of −100.48 °C to −87.96 °C, as compared with UACRC-TPE. In addition, FACRC-TPE obtains the highest exergy efficiency of 32.23%, while the UACRC-TPE exergy efficiency of 26.99% is slightly higher than the FACRC exergy efficiency of 25.19%.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Yingying & Li, Xiuzhen & Wang, Lin & Huang, Lisheng & Xiao, Yi & Wang, Zhanwei & Li, Shaoqiang, 2023. "Thermodynamic performance of the fractionated auto-cascade refrigeration cycle coupled with two-phase ejector using R1150/R600a at −80 °C temperature level," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:281:y:2023:i:c:s036054422301722x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422301722X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elakhdar, M. & Tashtoush, B.M. & Nehdi, E. & Kairouani, L., 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel Ejector Enhanced Vapor Compression Refrigeration (EEVCR) cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1217-1230.
    2. Hao, Xinyue & Wang, Lin & Wang, Zhanwei & Tan, Yingying & Yan, Xiaona, 2018. "Hybrid auto-cascade refrigeration system coupled with a heat-driven ejector cooling cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 988-998.
    3. Wang, Q. & Li, D.H. & Wang, J.P. & Sun, T.F. & Han, X.H. & Chen, G.M., 2013. "Numerical investigations on the performance of a single-stage auto-cascade refrigerator operating with two vapor–liquid separators and environmentally benign binary refrigerants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 949-955.
    4. Liu, Shuilong & Bai, Tao & Wei, Yuan & Yu, Jianlin, 2023. "Performance analysis of a modified ejector-enhanced auto-cascade refrigeration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    5. Bai, Tao & Yu, Jianlin & Yan, Gang, 2016. "Advanced exergy analysis on a modified auto-cascade freezer cycle with an ejector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 385-398.
    6. Bai, Tao & Yan, Gang & Yu, Jianlin, 2022. "Influence of internal heat exchanger position on the performance of ejector-enhanced auto-cascade refrigeration cycle for the low-temperature freezer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    7. Liu, Ye & Yu, Jianlin, 2018. "Performance analysis of an advanced ejector-expansion autocascade refrigeration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 859-867.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yinlong & Liu, Guoqiang & Chen, Qi & Yan, Gang, 2023. "Progress of auto-cascade refrigeration systems performance improvement: Composition separation, shift and regulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Qin, Yanbin & Li, Nanxi & Zhang, Hua & Liu, Baolin, 2022. "Study on the performance of an energy-efficient three-stage auto-cascade refrigeration system enhanced with a pressure regulator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Besagni, Giorgio, 2019. "Ejectors on the cutting edge: The past, the present and the perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 998-1003.
    4. Bai, Tao & Yan, Gang & Yu, Jianlin, 2018. "Experimental research on the pull-down performance of an ejector enhanced auto-cascade refrigeration system for low-temperature freezer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 647-657.
    5. Liu, Ye & Yu, Jianlin, 2018. "Performance analysis of an advanced ejector-expansion autocascade refrigeration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 859-867.
    6. Qin, Yanbin & Li, Nanxi & Zhang, Hua & Jin, Binhui & Liu, Baolin, 2022. "Experimental characterization of an innovative refrigeration system coupled with Linde-Hampson cycle and auto-cascade cycle for multi-stage refrigeration temperature applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Asgari, Sahar & Noorpoor, A.R. & Boyaghchi, Fateme Ahmadi, 2017. "Parametric assessment and multi-objective optimization of an internal auto-cascade refrigeration cycle based on advanced exergy and exergoeconomic concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 576-590.
    8. Hao, Xinyue & Wang, Lin & Wang, Zhanwei & Tan, Yingying & Yan, Xiaona, 2018. "Hybrid auto-cascade refrigeration system coupled with a heat-driven ejector cooling cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 988-998.
    9. Min-Ju Jeon, 2021. "Experimental Analysis of the R744/R404A Cascade Refrigeration System with Internal Heat Exchanger. Part 1: Coefficient of Performance Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Zhang, Ying & Deng, Shuai & Ni, Jiaxin & Zhao, Li & Yang, Xingyang & Li, Minxia, 2017. "A literature research on feasible application of mixed working fluid in flexible distributed energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 377-390.
    11. Mingzhang Pan & Huan Zhao & Dongwu Liang & Yan Zhu & Youcai Liang & Guangrui Bao, 2020. "A Review of the Cascade Refrigeration System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Qin, Yanbin & Li, Nanxi & Zhang, Hua & Liu, Baolin, 2021. "Energy and exergy analysis of a Linde-Hampson refrigeration system using R170, R41 and R1132a as low-GWP refrigerant blend components to replace R23," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    13. Yu, Binbin & Yang, Jingye & Wang, Dandong & Shi, Junye & Guo, Zhikai & Chen, Jiangping, 2019. "Experimental energetic analysis of CO2/R41 blends in automobile air-conditioning and heat pump systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1142-1153.
    14. Mohammadi, Z. & Fallah, M. & Mahmoudi, S.M. Seyed, 2019. "Advanced exergy analysis of recompression supercritical CO2 cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 631-643.
    15. Ge, Jing & Chen, Hongjie & Jin, Yang & Li, Jun, 2023. "Conical-cylindrical mixer ejector design model for predicting optimal nozzle exit position," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    16. Feili, Milad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi & Ghaebi, Hadi, 2020. "A new high-efficient cooling/power cogeneration system based on a double-flash geothermal power plant and a novel zeotropic bi-evaporator ejector refrigeration cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 2126-2152.
    17. Bai, Tao & Yu, Jianlin & Yan, Gang, 2016. "Advanced exergy analysis on a modified auto-cascade freezer cycle with an ejector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 385-398.
    18. Zhenzhen Liu & Jingde Jiang & Zilong Wang & Hua Zhang, 2023. "Thermodynamic Analysis of an Innovative Cold Energy Storage System for Auto-Cascade Refrigeration Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Yuan Zhao & Bowen Du & Shunyi Chen & Jun Zhao & Zhipeng Guo & Lingbao Wang, 2022. "Energy and Conventional and Advanced Exergy Analyses of Low-Temperature Geothermal Binary-Flashing Cycle Using Zeotropic Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Sun, Zhili & Wang, Qifan & Xie, Zhiyuan & Liu, Shengchun & Su, Dandan & Cui, Qi, 2019. "Energy and exergy analysis of low GWP refrigerants in cascade refrigeration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1170-1180.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:281:y:2023:i:c:s036054422301722x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.