IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v27y2002i3p271-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply- and demand-side effects of power sector planning with CO2 mitigation constraints in a developing country

Author

Listed:
  • Shrestha, Ram M.
  • O.P. Marpaung, Charles

Abstract

In this paper, the implications of CO2 emission mitigation constraints in the power sector planning in Indonesia are examined using a long term integrated resource planning model. An approach is developed to assess the contributions of supply- and demand-side effects to the changes in CO2, SO2 and NOx emissions from the power sector due to constraints on CO2 emissions. The results show that while both supply- and demand-side effects would act towards the reduction of CO2, SO2 and NOx emissions, the supply-side options would play the dominant role in emission mitigations from the power sector in Indonesia. The CO2 abatement cost would increase from US$7.8 to US$9.4 per ton of CO2, while the electricity price would increase by 3.1 to 19.8% if the annual CO2 emission reduction target is raised from 10 to 25%.

Suggested Citation

  • Shrestha, Ram M. & O.P. Marpaung, Charles, 2002. "Supply- and demand-side effects of power sector planning with CO2 mitigation constraints in a developing country," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 271-286.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:27:y:2002:i:3:p:271-286
    DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00085-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544201000858
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00085-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Centolella, Paul, 1995. "Environmental policies and their effects on utility planning and operations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 255-271.
    2. Maya, R. S. & Fenhann, Jorgen, 1994. "Methodological lessons and results from UNEP GHG abatement costing studies The case of Zimbabwe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(11), pages 955-963, November.
    3. Ellerman, A. Denny & Jacoby, Henry D. & Decaux, Annelene, 1998. "The effects on developing countries of the Kyoto Protocol and carbon dioxide emissions trading," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2019, The World Bank.
    4. Hobbs, Benjamin F., 1995. "Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen, Nhan T. & Ha-Duong, Minh, 2009. "Economic potential of renewable energy in Vietnam's power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1601-1613, May.
    2. Taseska, V. & Markovska, N. & Causevski, A. & Bosevski, T. & Pop-Jordanov, J., 2011. "Greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions reduction in a power system predominantly based on lignite," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2266-2270.
    3. Henning, Dag & Trygg, Louise, 2008. "Reduction of electricity use in Swedish industry and its impact on national power supply and European CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2330-2350, July.
    4. Gitizadeh, Mohsen & Kaji, Mahdi & Aghaei, Jamshid, 2013. "Risk based multiobjective generation expansion planning considering renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 74-82.
    5. Tanatvanit, Somporn & Limmeechokchai, Bundit & Chungpaibulpatana, Supachart, 2003. "Sustainable energy development strategies: implications of energy demand management and renewable energy in Thailand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 367-395, October.
    6. Batas Bjelić, Ilija & Rajaković, Nikola & Ćosić, Boris & Duić, Neven, 2013. "Increasing wind power penetration into the existing Serbian energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 30-37.
    7. Sarjiya, & Budi, Rizki Firmansyah Setya & Hadi, Sasongko Pramono, 2019. "Game theory for multi-objective and multi-period framework generation expansion planning in deregulated markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 323-330.
    8. Al-Mansour, Fouad & Sucic, Boris & Pusnik, Matevz, 2014. "Challenges and prospects of electricity production from renewable energy sources in Slovenia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 73-81.
    9. Shrestha, Ram M. & Marpaung, Charles O.P., 2006. "Integrated resource planning in the power sector and economy-wide changes in environmental emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3801-3811, December.
    10. Rachmatullah, C. & Aye, Lu & Fuller, R.J., 2007. "Scenario planning for the electricity generation in Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2352-2359, April.
    11. Nhan T. Nguyen & Minh Ha-Duong, 2009. "The potential for mitigation of CO2 emissions in Vietnam's power sector," Working Papers 22, Development and Policies Research Center (DEPOCEN), Vietnam.
    12. Shrestha, Ram M. & Marpaung, Charles O. P., 2005. "Supply- and demand-side effects of power sector planning with demand-side management options and SO2 emission constraints," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 815-825, April.
    13. Hu, Zhaoguang & Tan, Xiandong & Yang, Fan & Yang, Ming & Wen, Quan & Shan, Baoguo & Han, Xinyang, 2010. "Integrated resource strategic planning: Case study of energy efficiency in the Chinese power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6391-6397, November.
    14. Krishna Priya, G.S. & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2017. "Multi-objective pinch analysis for power system planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 335-347.
    15. Pasimeni, Maria Rita & Petrosillo, Irene & Aretano, Roberta & Semeraro, Teodoro & De Marco, Antonella & Zaccarelli, Nicola & Zurlini, Giovanni, 2014. "Scales, strategies and actions for effective energy planning: A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 165-174.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nhan T. Nguyen & Minh Ha-Duong, 2009. "The potential for mitigation of CO2 emissions in Vietnam's power sector," Working Papers 22, Development and Policies Research Center (DEPOCEN), Vietnam.
    2. De Jonghe, C. & Hobbs, B. F. & Belmans, R., 2011. "Integrating short-term demand response into long-term investment planning," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1132, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Shrestha, Ram M. & Marpaung, Charles O. P., 2005. "Supply- and demand-side effects of power sector planning with demand-side management options and SO2 emission constraints," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 815-825, April.
    4. Batas Bjelić, Ilija & Rajaković, Nikola & Ćosić, Boris & Duić, Neven, 2013. "Increasing wind power penetration into the existing Serbian energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 30-37.
    5. Pandey, Rahul, 2002. "Energy policy modelling: agenda for developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 97-106, January.
    6. Reza Nadimi & Masahito Takahashi & Koji Tokimatsu & Mika Goto, 2024. "The Reliability and Profitability of Virtual Power Plant with Short-Term Power Market Trading and Non-Spinning Reserve Diesel Generator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Pineau, Pierre-Olivier & Rasata, Hasina & Zaccour, Georges, 2011. "Impact of some parameters on investments in oligopolistic electricity markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 180-195, August.
    8. Ramírez-Sagner, Gonzalo & Muñoz, Francisco D., 2019. "The effect of head-sensitive hydropower approximations on investments and operations in planning models for policy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 38-47.
    9. Sarkar, Ashok, 1999. "Impact of competitive electricity market on renewable generation technology choice and policies in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1237-1240.
    10. Inzunza, Andrés & Muñoz, Francisco D. & Moreno, Rodrigo, 2021. "Measuring the effects of environmental policies on electricity markets risk," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Hach, Daniel & Chyong, Chi Kong & Spinler, Stefan, 2016. "Capacity market design options: A dynamic capacity investment model and a GB case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 691-705.
    12. Woo, C.K. & Liu, Y. & Zarnikau, J. & Shiu, A. & Luo, X. & Kahrl, F., 2018. "Price elasticities of retail energy demands in the United States: New evidence from a panel of monthly data for 2001–2016," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 460-474.
    13. Pereira, Sérgio & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A.I.F., 2014. "Short-term electricity planning with increase wind capacity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 12-22.
    14. Kjetil Haugen & Stein Wallace, 2006. "Stochastic programming: Potential hazards when random variables reflect market interaction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 119-127, February.
    15. Chen, Hao & Tang, Bao-Jun & Liao, Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2016. "A multi-period power generation planning model incorporating the non-carbon external costs: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1333-1345.
    16. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S., 2018. "State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 563-589.
    17. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A. Ismael F., 2020. "Cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency investments for high renewable electricity systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Halkos, George, 2014. "The Economics of Climate Change Policy: Critical review and future policy directions," MPRA Paper 56841, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Ren'e Aid & Luciano Campi & Nicolas Langren'e & Huy^en Pham, 2012. "A probabilistic numerical method for optimal multiple switching problem and application to investments in electricity generation," Papers 1210.8175, arXiv.org.
    20. Pereira, Sérgio & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A.I.F., 2016. "Optimization modeling to support renewables integration in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 316-325.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:27:y:2002:i:3:p:271-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.