IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v278y2023ipas0360544223012057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids for the trans-critical organic Rankine cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Miao, Zheng
  • Wang, Zhanbo
  • Varbanov, Petar Sabev
  • Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír
  • Xu, Jinliang

Abstract

The trans-critical organic Rankine cycle (TCORC) can achieve a better thermal match in the heating process of the working fluid compared to the subcritical cycle. By using zeotropic mixtures as working fluids, the thermal match in the cooling process can be further optimized, reducing the system's irreversibility. As the selection criteria are not systematically formulated, screening zeotropic mixtures for the TCORC is challenging. In this work, the thermodynamic and thermo-economic analysis was carried out to investigate how the thermal match in the heating/cooling processes affects the system performance, which is represented by the overall exergy efficiency and the levelized energy cost. Results show that the mixture's critical temperature is a key factor influencing the system performance. Then, the mixtures having a proper condensation temperature glide can further improve the system performance. The thermo-economic analysis shows that the mixtures selected according to these criteria can also provide better thermo-economic performance, although the heat exchanger area has been enlarged during the improvement of the thermal match in heat exchangers.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao, Zheng & Wang, Zhanbo & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Xu, Jinliang, 2023. "Development of selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids for the trans-critical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:278:y:2023:i:pa:s0360544223012057
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223012057
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maraver, Daniel & Royo, Javier & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2014. "Systematic optimization of subcritical and transcritical organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) constrained by technical parameters in multiple applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 11-29.
    2. Liu, Peng & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua, 2019. "How to approach optimal practical Organic Rankine cycle (OP-ORC) by configuration modification for diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 543-552.
    3. Kalina, Jacek & Świerzewski, Mateusz, 2019. "Identification of ORC unit operation in biomass-fired cogeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 400-414.
    4. Wang, Mingtao & Zhang, Juan & Liu, Qiyi & Tan, Luzhi, 2020. "Effects of critical temperature, critical pressure and dryness of working fluids on the performance of the transcritical organic rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Miao, Zheng & Zhang, Kai & Wang, Mengxiao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Thermodynamic selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 484-497.
    6. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    7. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "A supercritical Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat into power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 549-555.
    8. Song, Chongzhi & Gu, Mingyan & Miao, Zheng & Liu, Chao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Effect of fluid dryness and critical temperature on trans-critical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 97-109.
    9. Chen, Xiaoxue & Liu, Chao & Li, Qibin & Wang, Xurong & Wang, Shukun, 2020. "Dynamic behavior of supercritical organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Ayachi, Fadhel & Boulawz Ksayer, Elias & Zoughaib, Assaad & Neveu, Pierre, 2014. "ORC optimization for medium grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 47-56.
    11. Lan, Song & Li, Qingshan & Guo, Xin & Wang, Shukun & Chen, Rui, 2023. "Fuel saving potential analysis of bifunctional vehicular waste heat recovery system using thermoelectric generator and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    12. Ping, Xu & Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Xing, Chengda & Wang, Chongyao & Zhang, Wujie & Wang, Yan, 2022. "Energy, economic and environmental dynamic response characteristics of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system under different driving cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    13. Xu, Heng & Gao, Naiping & Zhu, Tong, 2016. "Investigation on the fluid selection and evaporation parametric optimization for sub- and supercritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 59-68.
    14. Hong Gao & Chao Liu & Chao He & Xiaoxiao Xu & Shuangying Wu & Yourong Li, 2012. "Performance Analysis and Working Fluid Selection of a Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle for Low Grade Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Schuster, A. & Karellas, S. & Aumann, R., 2010. "Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1033-1039.
    16. Hou, Jianchao & Cao, Mengchao & Liu, Pingkuo, 2018. "Development and utilization of geothermal energy in China: Current practices and future strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 401-412.
    17. Huang, Yisheng & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying & Luo, Xianglong & Liang, Yingzong & He, Jiacheng & Yang, Zhi, 2022. "Performance explorations of an organic Rankine cycle featured with separating and mixing composition of zeotropic mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    18. Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Cao, Feng & Guo, Jia-Qi & Tong, Zi-Xiang & Zhu, Han-Hui, 2019. "The investigation of thermo-economic performance and conceptual design for the miniaturized lead-cooled fast reactor composing supercritical CO2 power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 174-195.
    19. Le, Van Long & Feidt, Michel & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 513-526.
    20. Chen, Qicheng & Xu, Jinliang & Chen, Hongxia, 2012. "A new design method for Organic Rankine Cycles with constraint of inlet and outlet heat carrier fluid temperatures coupling with the heat source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 562-573.
    21. Li, You-Rong & Du, Mei-Tang & Wu, Chun-Mei & Wu, Shuang-Ying & Liu, Chao, 2014. "Potential of organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures as working fluids for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 509-519.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun, Dandan & Sun, Shoujun & Song, Qinglu & Wang, Dechang & Wang, Yunhua & Guo, Shuo, 2023. "Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis of two-stage cascade, Linder-Hampson and reverse Brayton systems in the temperature range from −120 °C to −60 °C," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Hu, Tao & Zhang, Jun & Su, Liangbin & Wang, Gang & Yu, Wan & Su, Huashan & Xiao, Renzheng, 2024. "Performance optimization and techno-economic analysis of a novel geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Li, Yuzhe & Feng, Jiaqi & Zhang, Xu & Bai, Bofeng, 2023. "Technical benefits of the subcritical inlet condition for high-speed CO2 centrifugal compressor in the advanced power-generation cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    4. Dan, Ma & He, Ang & Ren, Qiliang & Li, Wenbo & Huang, Kang & Wang, Xiangda & Feng, Boxuan & Sardari, Farshid, 2024. "Multi-aspect evaluation of a novel double-flash geothermally-powered integrated multigeneration system for generating power, cooling, and liquefied Hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    5. Wang, Chenfang & Liu, Shihao & Zhan, Shuming & Ou, Mengmeng & Wei, Jiangjun & Cheng, Xiaozhang & Zhuge, Weilin & Zhang, Yangjun, 2024. "Transcritical dual-loop Rankine cycle waste heat recovery system for China VI emission standards natural gas engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Mingtao & Zhang, Juan & Liu, Qiyi & Tan, Luzhi, 2020. "Effects of critical temperature, critical pressure and dryness of working fluids on the performance of the transcritical organic rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    3. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    4. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Mikelis, Angelos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic performance of CO2 and ultra-low GWP refrigerant mixtures as working fluids in ORC for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    5. Huixing, Zhai & Lin, Shi & Qingsong, An & Suilin, Wang & Baolin, An, 2021. "Key parameter influence mechanism and optimal working fluid screening correlation for trans-critical organic Rankine cycle with open type heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Song, Chongzhi & Gu, Mingyan & Miao, Zheng & Liu, Chao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Effect of fluid dryness and critical temperature on trans-critical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 97-109.
    7. Xu, Jinliang & Yu, Chao, 2014. "Critical temperature criterion for selection of working fluids for subcritical pressure Organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 719-733.
    8. Sánchez, Carlos J.N. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of transcritical Rankine cycles operating with numerous CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 180-190.
    9. Miao, Zheng & Zhang, Kai & Wang, Mengxiao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Thermodynamic selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 484-497.
    10. Zhai, Huixing & An, Qingsong & Shi, Lin & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 790-805.
    11. Li, Chengyu & Wang, Huaixin, 2016. "Power cycles for waste heat recovery from medium to high temperature flue gas sources – from a view of thermodynamic optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 707-721.
    12. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    13. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S. & Deng, Shuai, 2020. "Towards novel low temperature thermodynamic cycle: A critical review originated from organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    14. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    15. Glover, Stephen & Douglas, Roy & De Rosa, Mattia & Zhang, Xiaolei & Glover, Laura, 2015. "Simulation of a multiple heat source supercritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) for vehicle waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1568-1580.
    16. Jahedul Islam Chowdhury & Bao Kha Nguyen & David Thornhill & Yukun Hu & Payam Soulatiantork & Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan & Liz Varga, 2018. "Fuzzy Nonlinear Dynamic Evaporator Model in Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle Waste Heat Recovery Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Xu, Heng & Gao, Naiping & Zhu, Tong, 2016. "Investigation on the fluid selection and evaporation parametric optimization for sub- and supercritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 59-68.
    18. Le, Van Long & Feidt, Michel & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 513-526.
    19. Qiang Liu & Ran Chen & Xinliu Yang & Xiao Xiao, 2023. "Thermodynamic Analyses of Sub- and Supercritical ORCs Using R1234yf, R236ea and Their Mixtures as Working Fluids for Geothermal Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Grispos, Victoras & Karellas, Sotirios, 2021. "Exergetic efficiency potential of double-stage ORCs with zeotropic mixtures of natural hydrocarbons and CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:278:y:2023:i:pa:s0360544223012057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.