IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v277y2023ics0360544223010629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A promising alternative potential solution for sustainable and economical development of coal to ethylene glycol industry: Dimethyl oxalate to methyl glycolate process

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Qingchun
  • Fan, Yingjie
  • Liu, Chenglin
  • Zhou, Jianlong
  • Zhao, Lei
  • Zhou, Huairong

Abstract

The rapid expansion of coal-to-ethylene glycol (CtEG) industry leads to an oversupply of ethylene glycol and poor economic performance. Dimethyl oxalate is an important intermediate in this process, which can be selectively hydrogenated to methyl glycolate by changing the catalyst. Methyl glycolate is urgently needed for large-scale production of high-end degradable polyglycolic acid. However, the reported literature neither explores whether this alternative technology can turn the CtEG process into profit nor investigates the effect of various catalysts on the system performance of this alternative technology route. Therefore, three coal-to-methyl glycolate (CtMG) processes with various catalysts are proposed and optimized through rigorous modeling and simulation. The advantages and disadvantages of these three CtMG processes are analyzed and compared with the CtEG process. Results show that the dimethyl oxalate to methyl glycolate process with Ag-based catalyst has the highest yield of methyl glycolate (93.51%) compared with other catalysts. Three proposed CtMG processes have better techno-economic performance than the CtEG process. The carbon utilization and exergy efficiencies of the proposed CtMG processes are increased by 11.47%–19.22% and 9.58%–19.01%, respectively. The proposed CtMG processes turn a loss into a profit, which can improve the internal rate of return of CtEG process from −0.31% to higher than 24.14%. In particular, the CtMG process with Ag-based catalyst has the highest exergy efficiency, 50.95%, and internal rate of return, 27.48%. Therefore, CtMG technology can significantly relieve the survival pressure of CtEG enterprises, and improve their profitability and anti-risk capabilities. The research results of this study can provide an excellent theoretical basis and technical support for the transformation and upgrading of the CtEG industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Qingchun & Fan, Yingjie & Liu, Chenglin & Zhou, Jianlong & Zhao, Lei & Zhou, Huairong, 2023. "A promising alternative potential solution for sustainable and economical development of coal to ethylene glycol industry: Dimethyl oxalate to methyl glycolate process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:277:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223010629
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223010629
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chu, Genyun & Fan, Yingjie & Zhang, Dawei & Gao, Minglin & Yu, Jianhua & Xie, Jianhui & Yang, Qingchun, 2022. "A highly efficient and environmentally friendly approach for in-situ utilization of CO2 from coal to ethylene glycol plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Wang, Yinglong & Li, Guoxuan & Liu, Zhiqiang & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Yang, Sheng, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen process in comparison with coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1063-1075.
    3. Yang, Qingchun & Zhang, Dawei & Zhou, Huairong & Zhang, Chenwei, 2018. "Process simulation, analysis and optimization of a coal to ethylene glycol process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 521-534.
    4. Vilardi, Giorgio & Verdone, Nicola, 2022. "Exergy analysis of municipal solid waste incineration processes: The use of O2-enriched air and the oxy-combustion process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu, Genyun & Fan, Yingjie & Zhang, Dawei & Gao, Minglin & Yu, Jianhua & Xie, Jianhui & Yang, Qingchun, 2022. "A highly efficient and environmentally friendly approach for in-situ utilization of CO2 from coal to ethylene glycol plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Zhao, Jingyu & Deng, Jun & Wang, Tao & Song, Jiajia & Zhang, Yanni & Shu, Chi-Min & Zeng, Qiang, 2019. "Assessing the effectiveness of a high-temperature-programmed experimental system for simulating the spontaneous combustion properties of bituminous coal through thermokinetic analysis of four oxidatio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 587-596.
    3. Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2023. "Optimizing utilization pathways for biomass to chemicals and energy by integrating emergy analysis and particle swarm optimization (PSO)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1448-1459.
    4. Liu, Chenglin & Zhao, Lei & Zhu, Shun & Shen, Yuefeng & Yu, Jianhua & Yang, Qingchun, 2023. "Advanced exergy analysis and optimization of a coal to ethylene glycol (CtEG) process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Chen, Jianjun & Lam, Hon Loong & Qian, Yu & Yang, Siyu, 2021. "Combined energy consumption and CO2 capture management: Improved acid gas removal process integrated with CO2 liquefaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    6. Rahmad Syah & Afshin Davarpanah & Marischa Elveny & Amir Ghasemi & Dadan Ramdan, 2021. "The Economic Evaluation of Methanol and Propylene Production from Natural Gas at Petrochemical Industries in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Li, Zezheng & Yu, Pengwei & Xian, Yujiao & Fan, Jing-Li, 2024. "Investment benefit analysis of coal-to-hydrogen coupled CCS technology in China based on real option approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    8. Luís Carmo-Calado & Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez & Roberta Mota-Panizio & Bruno Guilherme-Garcia & Paulo Brito, 2020. "Co-Combustion of Waste Tires and Plastic-Rubber Wastes with Biomass Technical and Environmental Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Wijayasekera, Sachindra Chamode & Hewage, Kasun & Hettiaratchi, Patrick & Razi, Faran & Sadiq, Rehan, 2023. "Planning and development of waste-to-hydrogen conversion facilities: A parametric analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    10. Pedro Tavares Borges & Electo Eduardo Silva Lora & Osvaldo José Venturini & Marcelo Risso Errera & Diego Mauricio Yepes Maya & Yusuf Makarfi Isa & Alexander Kozlov & Shu Zhang, 2024. "A Comprehensive Technical, Environmental, Economic, and Bibliometric Assessment of Hydrogen Production Through Biomass Gasification, Including Global and Brazilian Potentials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Wang, Yangyang & Liu, Yangyang & Xu, Zaifeng & Yin, Kexin & Zhou, Yaru & Zhang, Jifu & Cui, Peizhe & Ma, Shinan & Wang, Yinglong & Zhu, Zhaoyou, 2024. "A review on renewable energy-based chemical engineering design and optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    12. Camilo Andrés Guerrero-Martin & Juan Sebastián Fernández-Ramírez & Jaime Eduardo Arturo-Calvache & Harvey Andrés Milquez-Sanabria & Fernando Antonio da Silva Fernandes & Vando José Costa Gomes & Wanes, 2023. "Exergy Load Distribution Analysis Applied to the Dehydration of Ethanol by Extractive Distillation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Chen, Heng & Li, Jiarui & Li, Tongyu & Xu, Gang & Jin, Xi & Wang, Min & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Performance assessment of a novel medical-waste-to-energy design based on plasma gasification and integrated with a municipal solid waste incineration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    14. Liu, Huan & Guo, Wei & Liu, Shuqin, 2022. "Comparative techno-economic performance analysis of underground coal gasification and surface coal gasification based coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    15. Li, Guoxuan & Wang, Shuai & Zhao, Jiangang & Qi, Huaqing & Ma, Zhaoyuan & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Gao, Jun & Wang, Yinglong, 2020. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen production with methane tri-reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    16. Fan, Jing-Li & Yu, Pengwei & Li, Kai & Xu, Mao & Zhang, Xian, 2022. "A levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison of coal-to-hydrogen with CCS and water electrolysis powered by renewable energy in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    17. Choe, Changgwon & Haider, Junaid & Lim, Hankwon, 2023. "Carbon capture and liquefaction from methane steam reforming unit: 4E’s analysis (Energy, Exergy, Economic, and Environmental)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    18. Alessandra Zanoletti & Luca Ciacci, 2022. "The Reuse of Municipal Solid Waste Fly Ash as Flame Retardant Filler: A Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, February.
    19. Cui, Zhe & Sun, Yang & Tian, Wende & Liu, Bin & Guo, Qingjie, 2023. "Dynamic optimal control of coal chemical looping gasification based on process modeling and complex risk computation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    20. Hugo Guzmán-Bello & Iosvani López-Díaz & Miguel Aybar-Mejía & Jose Atilio de Frias, 2022. "A Review of Trends in the Energy Use of Biomass: The Case of the Dominican Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:277:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223010629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.