IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v264y2023ics0360544222031851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the compound differential evolution game of new energy manufacturers’ two-stage market behavior under the weight of consumption responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Wanying
  • Dong, Fugui
  • Ji, Zhengsen
  • Xia, Meijuan

Abstract

To promote renewable energy consumption and achieve China's low-carbon energy transition, in 2019, China proposed the weight of consumption responsibility (WCR) for renewable energy in each province. This study aims to explore the micro-market behavior of new energy manufacturers in the context of WCR policy. A two-market bidding model for new energy manufacturers is first proposed, and a two-stage compound differential evolutionary game algorithm is proposed for solving the multi-party game problem. By selecting typical electricity demand scenarios, the evolution of new energy manufacturers' strategies in the electricity market and green certificate market as well as under different WCR and different thermal power unit parameters are analyzed. The research results show that when the non-hydropower WCR is relatively low, new energy manufacturers tend to adopt a low-price strategy for generation quotation and a low volume high price strategy for green certificate sales. Other conditions being unchanged, with the increase in non-hydropower WCR, all new energy manufacturers will still adopt a low-price strategy in the electricity market. New energy manufacturers with high installed capacity will increase progressively their certificate quotation. The higher output lower limit for thermal units is not conducive to electricity market bidding by new energy manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Wanying & Dong, Fugui & Ji, Zhengsen & Xia, Meijuan, 2023. "Analysis of the compound differential evolution game of new energy manufacturers’ two-stage market behavior under the weight of consumption responsibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:264:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222031851
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222031851
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richstein, Jörn C. & Lorenz, Casimir & Neuhoff, Karsten, 2020. "An auction story: How simple bids struggle with uncertainty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 89, pages 1-1.
    2. Alex Hollingsworth & Ivan Rudik, 2019. "External Impacts of Local Energy Policy: The Case of Renewable Portfolio Standards," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(1), pages 187-213.
    3. Ford, Andrew & Vogstad, Klaus & Flynn, Hilary, 2007. "Simulating price patterns for tradable green certificates to promote electricity generation from wind," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 91-111, January.
    4. Currier, Kevin M. & Rassouli-Currier, Susanne, 2018. "Producer incentives in electricity markets with green quotas and tradable certificates," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 59-68.
    5. Wang, Jidong & Wu, Jiahui & Che, Yanbo, 2019. "Agent and system dynamics-based hybrid modeling and simulation for multilateral bidding in electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 444-456.
    6. Zhang, Qi & Wang, Ge & Li, Yan & Li, Hailong & McLellan, Benjamin & Chen, Siyuan, 2018. "Substitution effect of renewable portfolio standards and renewable energy certificate trading for feed-in tariff," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 426-435.
    7. Wang, Bing & Wei, Yi-Ming & Yuan, Xiao-Chen, 2018. "Possible design with equity and responsibility in China’s renewable portfolio standards," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 685-694.
    8. Gejirifu De & Zhongfu Tan & Menglu Li & Liling Huang & Xueying Song, 2018. "Two-Stage Stochastic Optimization for the Strategic Bidding of a Generation Company Considering Wind Power Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Eric Bowen & Donald J. Lacombe, 2017. "Spatial Dependence in State Renewable Policy: Effects of Renewable Portfolio Standards on Renewable Generation within NERC Regions," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    10. Ciarreta, Aitor & Espinosa, Maria Paz & Pizarro-Irizar, Cristina, 2017. "Optimal regulation of renewable energy: A comparison of Feed-in Tariffs and Tradable Green Certificates in the Spanish electricity system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 387-399.
    11. Huang, Yujing & Wang, Yudong & Liu, Nian, 2022. "A two-stage energy management for heat-electricity integrated energy system considering dynamic pricing of Stackelberg game and operation strategy optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    12. Liu, Yang & Jiang, Zhigao & Guo, Bowei, 2022. "Assessing China’s provincial electricity spot market pilot operations: Lessons from Guangdong province," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    13. Zhang, Yu & Li, Leiming, 2022. "Research on travelers’ transportation mode choice between carsharing and private cars based on the logit dynamic evolutionary game model," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    14. Ji, Shou-feng & Zhao, Dan & Luo, Rong-juan, 2019. "Evolutionary game analysis on local governments and manufacturers' behavioral strategies: Impact of phasing out subsidies for new energy vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. An, Jongbaek & Lee, Minhyun & Yeom, Seungkeun & Hong, Taehoon, 2020. "Determining the Peer-to-Peer electricity trading price and strategy for energy prosumers and consumers within a microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Tonghe & Hua, Haochen & Shi, Tianying & Wang, Rui & Sun, Yizhong & Naidoo, Pathmanathan, 2024. "A bi-level dispatch optimization of multi-microgrid considering green electricity consumption willingness under renewable portfolio standard policy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    2. Wang, Benke & Li, Chunhua & Ban, Yongshuang & Zhao, Zeming & Wang, Zengxu, 2024. "A two-tier bidding model considering a multi-stage offer‑carbon joint incentive clearing mechanism for coupled electricity and carbon markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    3. Wu, Jiaqian & Chen, Yu & Yu, Lean & Li, Guohao & Li, Jingjing, 2023. "Has the evolution of renewable energy policies facilitated the construction of a new power system for China? A system dynamics analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Zhi-Ping & Cai, Siqin & Guo, Dongliang & Xu, Bo, 2022. "Facing the uncertainty of renewable energy production: Production decisions of a power plant with different risk attitudes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1237-1247.
    2. Yanming Sun & Lin Zhang, 2019. "Full Separation or Full Integration? An Investigation of the Optimal Renewables Policy Employing Tradable Green Certificate Systems in Two Countries’ Electricity Markets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Hao, Peng & Guo, Jun-Peng & Chen, Yihsu & Xie, Bai-Chen, 2020. "Does a combined strategy outperform independent policies? Impact of incentive policies on renewable power generation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Wang, Yun & Xie, Haipeng & Sun, Xiaotian & Tang, Lingfeng & Bie, Zhaohong, 2022. "A cross-chain enabled day-ahead collaborative power-carbon-TGC market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Yu, Xianyu & Ge, Shengxian & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Qunwei & Chang, Ching-Ter & Sang, Xiuzhi, 2022. "Whether feed-in tariff can be effectively replaced or not? An integrated analysis of renewable portfolio standards and green certificate trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Wang, Hongye & Su, Bin & Mu, Hailin & Li, Nan & Gui, Shusen & Duan, Ye & Jiang, Bo & Kong, Xue, 2020. "Optimal way to achieve renewable portfolio standard policy goals from the electricity generation, transmission, and trading perspectives in southern China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Jed J. Cohen & Levan Elbakidze & Randall Jackson, 2022. "Interstate protectionism: the case of solar renewable energy credits," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 717-738, March.
    8. Fugui Dong & Lei Shi & Xiaohui Ding & Yuan Li & Yongpeng Shi, 2019. "Study on China’s Renewable Energy Policy Reform and Improved Design of Renewable Portfolio Standard," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Wang, Ge & Zhang, Qi & Li, Yan & Mclellan, Benjamin C. & Pan, Xunzhang, 2019. "Corrective regulations on renewable energy certificates trading: Pursuing an equity-efficiency trade-off," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 970-982.
    10. Rasool Bukhsh & Muhammad Umar Javed & Aisha Fatima & Nadeem Javaid & Muhammad Shafiq & Jin-Ghoo Choi, 2020. "Cost Efficient Real Time Electricity Management Services for Green Community Using Fog," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Ying, Zhou & Xin-gang, Zhao & Lei, Xu, 2022. "Supply side incentive under the Renewable Portfolio Standards: A perspective of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 505-518.
    12. Tan, Qinliang & Ding, Yihong & Zheng, Jin & Dai, Mei & Zhang, Yimei, 2021. "The effects of carbon emissions trading and renewable portfolio standards on the integrated wind–photovoltaic–thermal power-dispatching system: Real case studies in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Song, Xiao-hua & Han, Jing-jing & Zhang, Lu & Zhao, Cai-ping & Wang, Peng & Liu, Xiao-yan & Li, Qiao-chu, 2021. "Impacts of renewable portfolio standards on multi-market coupling trading of renewable energy in China: A scenario-based system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Dong, Zhuojia & Yu, Xianyu & Chang, Ching-Ter & Zhou, Dequn & Sang, Xiuzhi, 2022. "How does feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard evolve synergistically? An integrated approach of tripartite evolutionary game and system dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 864-877.
    15. Bangjun, Wang & Feng, Zhaolei & Feng, Ji & Yu, Pan & Cui, Linyu, 2022. "Decision making on investments in photovoltaic power generation projects based on renewable portfolio standard: Perspective of real option," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1033-1045.
    16. Liu, Da & Jiang, Yan & Peng, Chuan & Jian, Jianhui & Zheng, Jing, 2024. "Can green certificates substitute for renewable electricity subsidies? A Chinese experience," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    17. Ying, Zhou & Xin-gang, Zhao & Zhen, Wang, 2020. "Demand side incentive under renewable portfolio standards: A system dynamics analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. Zhihan Shi & Weisong Han & Guangming Zhang & Zhiqing Bai & Mingxiang Zhu & Xiaodong Lv, 2022. "Research on Low-Carbon Energy Sharing through the Alliance of Integrated Energy Systems with Multiple Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Liu, Jicheng & Sun, Jiakang & Yuan, Hanying & Su, Yihan & Feng, Shuxian & Lu, Chaoran, 2022. "Behavior analysis of photovoltaic-storage-use value chain game evolution in blockchain environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Karsten Neuhoff & Jörn C. Richstein & Mats Kröger, 2023. "Reacting to Changing Paradigms: How and Why to Reform Electricity Markets," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 127, number pbk189, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:264:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222031851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.