IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v253y2022ics0360544222010283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation on the fluctuation characteristics and its influence on impact force of supercritical carbon dioxide jet

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Huidong
  • Liu, Yong
  • Tang, Jiren
  • Liu, Wenchuan
  • Chen, Changjiang

Abstract

Supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) jet-assisted drilling is considered a promising technology in unconventional natural gas drilling engineering. The flow field characteristics of the supercritical CO2 jet are the critical factors that affect the erosion performance of the jet. The relation between the flow fluctuation characteristics and the jet is required further investigation to enhance its erosion performance. In this study, the fluctuation features of a supercritical CO2 jet were simulated based on a modified real gas model. Subsequently, impact force tests were conducted using an I-Scan flexible array pressure sensor to obtain peak pressures at different standoff distances. The results indicated that the flow field structure of the supercritical CO2 jet exhibits typical compressible wave-like features, which can be accurately determined by the expansion ratio. The expansion ratio was mainly affected by the inlet pressure, inlet temperature, and ambient pressure. The static pressure, temperature, and velocity distributions of a free jet could be significantly influenced by the fluctuation characteristics. Among them, the static pressure and temperature trend decrease in the expansion waves and increase in the compression waves, while the velocity shows a contrary variation trend. When the jet was under-expansion, the lengths of the wave node and jet potential core increased with increasing inlet pressure and decreased with increasing inlet temperature and ambient pressure. Moreover, the fluctuation characteristics of the flow field significantly affected the peak impact force of the supercritical CO2 jet. The peak impact force at the compression wave positions tended to be higher than that at the adjacent expansion wave positions. The maximum pressure difference of jet impact was 7.39 MPa in this study, which occurred when the standoff distance was 23.0 and 17.3 mm and accounts for 18.6% of the impact pressure at 23.0 mm. A plate shock wave was observed ahead of the target when the standoff distance was larger than 23.0 mm, which accounted for the abrupt decrease in pressure at the stagnation region.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Huidong & Liu, Yong & Tang, Jiren & Liu, Wenchuan & Chen, Changjiang, 2022. "Investigation on the fluctuation characteristics and its influence on impact force of supercritical carbon dioxide jet," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:253:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222010283
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222010283
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Hui & Chen, Li & Qu, Zhiguo & Yin, Ying & Kang, Qinjun & Yu, Bo & Tao, Wen-Quan, 2020. "Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production — A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Zhang, Xiang & Wei, Bing & You, Junyu & Liu, Jiang & Wang, Dianlin & Lu, Jun & Tong, Jing, 2021. "Characterizing pore-level oil mobilization processes in unconventional reservoirs assisted by state-of-the-art nuclear magnetic resonance technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Qin, Chao & Jiang, Yongdong & Zhou, Junping & Zuo, Shuangying & Chen, Shiwan & Liu, Zhengjie & Yin, Hong & Li, Ye, 2022. "Influence of supercritical CO2 exposure on water wettability of shale: Implications for CO2 sequestration and shale gas recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Jian & Liao, Hualin & Xu, Yiji & Shi, Fengxia & Sun, Baojing & Chang, Fangrui & Han, Xiaoqiang, 2023. "Experimental and theoretical evaluation of tubing cutting with rotating particle jet in oil and gas borehole operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Wu, Pengzhi & Liu, Changchun & Wen, Hu & Luo, Zhenmin & Fan, Shixing & Mi, Wansheng, 2023. "Experimental investigation of jet impingement during accidental release of liquid CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Tang, Jiren & Chen, Long & Liu, Wenchuan & Zhang, Huali & Wang, Junxin & Liu, Qi, 2023. "Investigation on jet diffusion mechanism with applications to enhancing efficiency in forming directional fractures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Jianguang & Fu, Lanqing & Zhao, Guozhong & Zhao, Xiaoqing & Liu, Xinrong & Wang, Anlun & Wang, Yan & Cao, Sheng & Jin, Yuhan & Yang, Fengrui & Liu, Tianyang & Yang, Ying, 2023. "Nuclear magnetic resonance study on imbibition and stress sensitivity of lamellar shale oil reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Xiao Sun & Qi Cheng & Jiren Tang & Xing Guo & Yunzhong Jia & Jingfu Mu & Guilin Zhao & Yalu Liu, 2023. "Assessment of the CO 2 Geological Storage Potential of Yanchang Shale Gas Formation (Chang7 Member) Considering the Capillary Sealing Capability of Caprock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Xuhua Gao & Junhong Yu & Xinchun Shang & Weiyao Zhu, 2023. "Investigation on Nonlinear Behaviors of Seepage in Deep Shale Gas Reservoir with Viscoelasticity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Xu, Chao & Wang, Wenjing & Wang, Kai & Zhou, Aitao & Guo, Lin & Yang, Tong, 2023. "Filling–adsorption mechanism and diffusive transport characteristics of N2/CO2 in coal: Experiment and molecular simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Qin, Chao & Jiang, Yongdong & Cao, Mengyao & Zhou, Junping & Song, Xiao & Zuo, Shuangying & Chen, Shiwan & Luo, Yahuang & Xiao, Siyou & Yin, Hong & Du, Xidong, 2023. "Experimental study on the methane desorption-diffusion behavior of Longmaxi shale exposure to supercritical CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    6. Wenchao Liu & Yuejie Yang & Chengcheng Qiao & Chen Liu & Boyu Lian & Qingwang Yuan, 2023. "Progress of Seepage Law and Development Technologies for Shale Condensate Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Wang, Ziwei & Qin, Yong & Shen, Jian & Li, Teng & Zhang, Xiaoyang & Cai, Ying, 2022. "A novel permeability prediction model for coal based on dynamic transformation of pores in multiple scales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    8. Bowen Ling & Hasan J. Khan & Jennifer L. Druhan & Ilenia Battiato, 2020. "Multi-Scale Microfluidics for Transport in Shale Fabric," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Wu, Jian & Gan, Yixiang & Shi, Zhang & Huang, Pengyu & Shen, Luming, 2023. "Pore-scale lattice Boltzmann simulation of CO2-CH4 displacement in shale matrix," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    10. Zhang, Yingnan & Li, Shujun & Dou, Xiangji & Wang, Sen & He, Yanfeng & Feng, Qihong, 2023. "Molecular insights into the natural gas regulating tight oil movability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    11. Zhang, Xiaoying & Ma, Funing & Yin, Shangxian & Wallace, Corey D & Soltanian, Mohamad Reza & Dai, Zhenxue & Ritzi, Robert W. & Ma, Ziqi & Zhan, Chuanjun & Lü, Xiaoshu, 2021. "Application of upscaling methods for fluid flow and mass transport in multi-scale heterogeneous media: A critical review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    12. Guang, Wenfeng & Zhang, Zhenyu & Zhang, Lei & Ranjith, P.G. & Hao, Shengpeng & Liu, Xiaoqian, 2023. "Confinement effect on transport diffusivity of adsorbed CO2–CH4 mixture in coal nanopores for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    13. Popkova, Elena G. & Sergi, Bruno S., 2024. "Energy infrastructure: Investment, sustainability and AI," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    14. Wang, Youshi & Wang, Hanpeng & Sun, Dekang & Lin, Chunjin & Yu, Xinping & Hou, Fubin & Bai, Zihan, 2024. "Permeability evolution of deep-buried coal based on NMR analysis: CO2 adsorption and water content effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    15. Qin, Xiangjie & Wu, Jinsui & Xia, Yuxuan & Wang, Han & Cai, Jianchao, 2024. "Multicomponent image-based modeling of water flow in heterogeneous wet shale nanopores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    16. Ting Chen & Laiming Song & Xueying Zhang & Yawen Yang & Huifang Fan & Bin Pan, 2023. "A Review of Mineral and Rock Wettability Changes Induced by Reaction: Implications for CO 2 Storage in Saline Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Wang, Sijia & Li, Shaohua & Liu, Donglei & Shi, Menglan & Tong, Baocai & Cheng, Chengzu & Jiang, Lanlan & Song, Yongchen, 2023. "Study of the impact of various porous media on pore space utilization and CO2 storage by injection of microbubbles into oil reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    18. Li, Dafang & Sun, Weifu & Luo, Zhenmin, 2023. "Methane deflagration promoted by enhancing ignition efficiency via hydrogen doping, with a view to fracturing shales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    19. Wang, Yanwei & Dai, Zhenxue & Chen, Li & Shen, Xudong & Chen, Fangxuan & Soltanian, Mohamad Reza, 2023. "An integrated multi-scale model for CO2 transport and storage in shale reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    20. Wei, Jianguang & Zhou, Xiaofeng & Shamil, Sultanov & Yuriy, Kotenev & Yang, Erlong & Yang, Ying & Wang, Anlun, 2024. "High-pressure mercury intrusion analysis of pore structure in typical lithofacies shale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:253:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222010283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.