IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v250y2022ics036054422200696x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bidding behaviors of GENCOs under bounded rationality with renewable energy

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Hongye
  • Chen, Qixin
  • Shahidehpour, Mohammad
  • Xia, Qing
  • Kang, Chongqing

Abstract

With the worldwide restructuring of power markets, it is more meaningful to analyze the bidding behaviors of generation companies (GENCOs). A realistic bidding behavior model can help to design better power market mechanisms. However, most existing studies usually use strong assumptions, where all GENCOs behave perfectly rationally when participating in power markets. Many GENCOs' observed bidding behaviors are proved to deviate from the simulated perfectly rational ones. Thus, it is significant to introduce individual subjective perspectives into the bidding behavior modeling to obtain more realistic models. Although several studies have been working on this topic by introducing bounded rationality, they still have some problems in modeling bounded rationality, power system operation, power market rules, etc. This paper proposes a novel bidding behavior model for GENCOs under bounded rationality with renewable energy to overcome these problems. The introduced bounded rationality features include prospect theory in the form of framing effects and the concept of fairness constraints on profit-making. A Stackelberg game model is formulated to analyze the interaction between a GENCO with renewables and a day-ahead power market. The proposed model is nonlinear, which is further transformed into a mixed-integer linear formulation by applying Karush–Kuhn–Tucker theorem and strong duality theorem. Based on a modified IEEE-30 bus system with high renewable, an illustrative example is proposed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model and analyze the bidding behaviors of bounded rational GENCOs and the corresponding effects on power markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Hongye & Chen, Qixin & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2022. "Bidding behaviors of GENCOs under bounded rationality with renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:250:y:2022:i:c:s036054422200696x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422200696X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123793?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Fei & Ge, Xinxin & Yang, Peng & Li, Kangping & Mi, Zengqiang & Siano, Pierluigi & Duić, Neven, 2020. "Day-ahead optimal bidding and scheduling strategies for DER aggregator considering responsive uncertainty under real-time pricing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Sun, Bo & Deng, Ruilin & Ren, Bin & Teng, Minmin & Cheng, Siyuan & Wang, Fan, 2022. "Identification method of market power abuse of generators based on lasso-logit model in spot market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    3. Kraan, O. & Kramer, G.J. & Nikolic, I., 2018. "Investment in the future electricity system - An agent-based modelling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 569-580.
    4. David Pozo & Enzo Sauma & Javier Contreras, 2017. "Basic theoretical foundations and insights on bilevel models and their applications to power systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 254(1), pages 303-334, July.
    5. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard, 1986. "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 728-741, September.
    6. Matamala, Yolanda & Feijoo, Felipe, 2021. "A two-stage stochastic Stackelberg model for microgrid operation with chance constraints for renewable energy generation uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    7. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    8. Mansour-lakouraj, Mohammad & Shahabi, Majid, 2019. "Comprehensive analysis of risk-based energy management for dependent micro-grid under normal and emergency operations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 928-943.
    9. Nikpour, Ahmad & Nateghi, Abolfazl & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2021. "Day-ahead optimal bidding of microgrids considering uncertainties of price and renewable energy resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    11. Nojavan, Sayyad & Najafi-Ghalelou, Afshin & Majidi, Majid & Zare, Kazem, 2018. "Optimal bidding and offering strategies of merchant compressed air energy storage in deregulated electricity market using robust optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 250-257.
    12. Gao, Jianwei & Ma, Zeyang & Guo, Fengjia, 2019. "The influence of demand response on wind-integrated power system considering participation of the demand side," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 723-738.
    13. Hany Elgamal, Ahmed & Kocher-Oberlehner, Gudrun & Robu, Valentin & Andoni, Merlinda, 2019. "Optimization of a multiple-scale renewable energy-based virtual power plant in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    14. Poplavskaya, Ksenia & Lago, Jesus & de Vries, Laurens, 2020. "Effect of market design on strategic bidding behavior: Model-based analysis of European electricity balancing markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    15. Das, Saborni & Basu, Mousumi, 2020. "Day-ahead optimal bidding strategy of microgrid with demand response program considering uncertainties and outages of renewable energy resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Pozo, David & Sauma, Enzo & Contreras, Javier, 2017. "When doing nothing may be the best investment action: Pessimistic anticipative power transmission planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 383-398.
    17. Wu, Yunna & Ke, Yiming & Xu, Chuanbo & Li, Lingwenying, 2019. "An integrated decision-making model for sustainable photovoltaic module supplier selection based on combined weight and cumulative prospect theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1235-1251.
    18. Gerd Gigerenzer & Reinhard Selten (ed.), 2002. "Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262571641, April.
    19. Drazen Prelec, 1998. "The Probability Weighting Function," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 497-528, May.
    20. Shafiekhani, Morteza & Ahmadi, Abdollah & Homaee, Omid & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2022. "Optimal bidding strategy of a renewable-based virtual power plant including wind and solar units and dispatchable loads," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    21. Hadayeghparast, Shahrzad & SoltaniNejad Farsangi, Alireza & Shayanfar, Heidarali, 2019. "Day-ahead stochastic multi-objective economic/emission operational scheduling of a large scale virtual power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 630-646.
    22. Fazlalipour, Pary & Ehsan, Mehdi & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam, 2019. "Risk-aware stochastic bidding strategy of renewable micro-grids in day-ahead and real-time markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 689-700.
    23. Barazza, Elsa & Strachan, Neil, 2020. "The impact of heterogeneous market players with bounded-rationality on the electricity sector low-carbon transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    24. Kong, Xiangyu & Xiao, Jie & Wang, Chengshan & Cui, Kai & Jin, Qiang & Kong, Deqian, 2019. "Bi-level multi-time scale scheduling method based on bidding for multi-operator virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 178-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Shengyang & Ding, Zhaohao & Wang, Jingyu & Shi, Dongyuan, 2023. "Unveiling bidding uncertainties in electricity markets: A Bayesian deep learning framework based on accurate variational inference," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Xinyi Xie & Liming Ying & Xue Cui, 2022. "Price Strategy Analysis of Electricity Retailers Based on Evolutionary Game on Complex Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Wu, Jiahui & Wang, Jidong & Kong, Xiangyu, 2022. "Strategic bidding in a competitive electricity market: An intelligent method using Multi-Agent Transfer Learning based on reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Li, Qirui & Yang, Zhifang & Yu, Juan & Li, Wenyuan, 2023. "Impacts of previous revenues on bidding strategies in electricity market: A quantitative analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yubin & Zheng, Yanchong & Yang, Qiang, 2023. "Optimal energy management of integrated energy systems for strategic participation in competitive electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    2. Wang, Yubin & Zheng, Yanchong & Yang, Qiang, 2023. "Day-ahead bidding strategy of regional integrated energy systems considering multiple uncertainties in electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    3. Rezaei, Navid & Pezhmani, Yasin & Khazali, Amirhossein, 2022. "Economic-environmental risk-averse optimal heat and power energy management of a grid-connected multi microgrid system considering demand response and bidding strategy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    4. Mostafa Darvishi & Mehrdad Tahmasebi & Ehsan Shokouhmand & Jagadeesh Pasupuleti & Pitshou Bokoro & Jwan Satei Raafat, 2023. "Optimal Operation of Sustainable Virtual Power Plant Considering the Amount of Emission in the Presence of Renewable Energy Sources and Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Mohammad Mohammadi Roozbehani & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Saeed Hasanzadeh & Seifeddine Ben Elghali, 2022. "Virtual Power Plant Operational Strategies: Models, Markets, Optimization, Challenges, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Yu, Min Gyung & Pavlak, Gregory S., 2023. "Risk-aware sizing and transactive control of building portfolios with thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    7. Christos N. Dimitriadis & Evangelos G. Tsimopoulos & Michael C. Georgiadis, 2021. "A Review on the Complementarity Modelling in Competitive Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Farrokhifar, Meisam & Nie, Yinghui & Pozo, David, 2020. "Energy systems planning: A survey on models for integrated power and natural gas networks coordination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Jun Dong & Yuanyuan Wang & Xihao Dou & Zhengpeng Chen & Yaoyu Zhang & Yao Liu, 2021. "Research on Decision Optimization Model of Microgrid Participating in Spot Market Transaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    10. Kai Barron, 2021. "Belief updating: does the ‘good-news, bad-news’ asymmetry extend to purely financial domains?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 31-58, March.
    11. Lu, Zhiming & Gao, Yan & Xu, Chuanbo, 2021. "Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Gupta, Aparna & Palepu, Sai, 2024. "Designing risk-free service for renewable wind and solar resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 715-728.
    13. Songkai Wang & Rong Jia & Xiaoyu Shi & Chang Luo & Yuan An & Qiang Huang & Pengcheng Guo & Xueyan Wang & Xuewen Lei, 2022. "Research on Capacity Allocation Optimization of Commercial Virtual Power Plant (CVPP)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Thomas Baldauf & Patrick Jochem, 2024. "Project finance or corporate finance for renewable energy? an agent-based insight," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 19(4), pages 759-805, October.
    15. Wang, Fei & Ge, Xinxin & Yang, Peng & Li, Kangping & Mi, Zengqiang & Siano, Pierluigi & Duić, Neven, 2020. "Day-ahead optimal bidding and scheduling strategies for DER aggregator considering responsive uncertainty under real-time pricing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A. Ismael F., 2021. "A review of co-optimization approaches for operational and planning problems in the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    17. Fotopoulou, Maria & Rakopoulos, Dimitrios & Petridis, Stefanos & Drosatos, Panagiotis, 2024. "Assessment of smart grid operation under emergency situations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    18. Gonzalez-Romero, Isaac-Camilo & Wogrin, Sonja & Gomez, Tomas, 2021. "Transmission and storage expansion planning under imperfect market competition: Social planner versus merchant investor," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Mohseni, Soheil & Brent, Alan C. & Kelly, Scott & Browne, Will N., 2022. "Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:250:y:2022:i:c:s036054422200696x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.