IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i23p5884-d1527741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Operation of Generation Company’s Participating in Multiple Markets with Allocation and Exchange of Energy-Consuming Rights and Carbon Credits

Author

Listed:
  • Hanyu Yang

    (College of Electrical Engineering and Control Science, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China)

  • Mengru Ding

    (College of Electrical Engineering and Control Science, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China)

  • Muyao Li

    (China Electric Power Research Institute (Nanjing), Nanjing 210003, China)

  • Shilei Wu

    (College of Electrical Engineering and Control Science, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China)

  • Ye Zhang

    (Inner Mongolia Power Electric Operations Control Company, Inner Mongolia Electric Power (Group) Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Xun Dou

    (College of Electrical Engineering and Control Science, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China)

Abstract

The proposal of the energy-consuming right (ECR) market may lead to generation companies (GenCos) facing the risk of being overcharged due to the inaccurate calculation of carbon emission reduction, since it claims the same credit as the carbon market does. To estimate the carbon emission reduction accurately for the GenCos that participate in electricity, carbon, and ECR markets simultaneously, this paper proposes a market framework where a flexible exchange mechanism between the ECR and carbon markets is specially considered. To investigate the influence of the allocation and exchange of ECR and carbon credits on the behavior of GenCos that participate in multi-type markets, a bi-level model based on the leader–follower game theory is proposed. In the upper level of the proposed model, a decision problem for maximizing the profit of GenCos is developed, which is especially constrained to the primary allocation of ECR and carbon credits. While the multi-type market clearing model and an exchange mechanism between the ECR and carbon credits are proposed in the lower level of the model. The bi-level problem is converted into the mathematical program with equilibrium constraints (MPECs) through the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) condition to solve. The results illustrate that the interaction between the ECR market and the carbon market can improve the energy efficiency and reduce the carbon emissions of GenCos.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanyu Yang & Mengru Ding & Muyao Li & Shilei Wu & Ye Zhang & Xun Dou, 2024. "Optimal Operation of Generation Company’s Participating in Multiple Markets with Allocation and Exchange of Energy-Consuming Rights and Carbon Credits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5884-:d:1527741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5884/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5884/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Yibing & Wang, Can & Sun, Yuwei & Liu, Xianbing, 2018. "Factors influencing companies' willingness to pay for carbon emissions: Emission trading schemes in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 357-367.
    2. Menegaki, Angeliki N. & Ahmad, Nisar & Aghdam, Reza FathollahZadeh & Naz, Amber, 2021. "The convergence in various dimensions of energy-economy-environment linkages: A comprehensive citation-based systematic literature review," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Guo, Hongye & Chen, Qixin & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2022. "Bidding behaviors of GENCOs under bounded rationality with renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    4. Wang, Kaike & Su, Xuewei & Wang, Shuhong, 2023. "How does the energy-consuming rights trading policy affect China's carbon emission intensity?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Weilong & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The impact of energy-consuming rights trading on green total factor productivity in the context of digital economy: Evidence from listed firms in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Zhang, Xinyue & Guo, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Xingping, 2023. "Assessing the policy synergy among power, carbon emissions trading and tradable green certificate market mechanisms on strategic GENCOs in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    3. Li, Zheng-Zheng & Li, Yameng & Huang, Chia-Yun & Peculea, Adelina Dumitrescu, 2023. "Volatility spillover across Chinese carbon markets: Evidence from quantile connectedness method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Wang, Wei & Zhang, Yue-Jun, 2022. "Does China's carbon emissions trading scheme affect the market power of high-carbon enterprises?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Guo, Bingnan & Hu, Peiji & Lin, Ji, 2024. "The effect of digital infrastructure development on enterprise green transformation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Zheng, Qingying & Hu, Haoyang & Li, Jianglong, 2024. "Enterprise decision-making in energy use rights trading market: A theoretical and simulation study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Qiuyan Yan & Kai Wan, 2024. "Energy-Consuming Right Trading Policy and Corporate ESG Performance: Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Jiemin Huang & Jiaoju Ge & Kai Chang & Yixiang Tian, 2020. "Dynamic hedging analysis of carbon emission trading yield in Shenzhen," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(5), pages 870-885, August.
    9. Zhang, He & Gong, Zhenting & Yang, Yunglieh & Chen, Fan, 2023. "Dynamic connectedness between China green bond, carbon market and traditional financial markets: Evidence from quantile connectedness approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    10. Yongliang Yang & Yiyang Guo & Suqing Luo, 2020. "Consumers’ Intention and Cognition for Low-Carbon Behavior: A Case Study of Hangzhou in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Hussain, Syed Mujahid & Ahmad, Nisar & Ahmed, Sheraz, 2023. "Applications of high-frequency data in finance: A bibliometric literature review," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Xinyi Xie & Liming Ying & Xue Cui, 2022. "Price Strategy Analysis of Electricity Retailers Based on Evolutionary Game on Complex Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Miaomiao Tao & Pierre Failler & Lim Thye Goh & Wee Yeap Lau & Hanghang Dong & Liang Xie, 2022. "Quantify the Effect of China’s Emission Trading Scheme on Low-carbon Eco-efficiency: Evidence from China’s 283 Cities," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-33, August.
    14. Kangkang Zhang & Deyi Xu & Shiran Li & Na Zhou & Jinhui Xiong, 2019. "Has China’s Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme Influenced the Carbon Intensity of Output?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Di Li & Qianbin Di & Hailin Mu & Zenglin Han & Hongye Wang & Ye Duan, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Output Adjustment Strategy and Carbon Trading Policy on the Response, Stability and Complexity of Steel Market under the Dynamic Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-40, September.
    16. Yukun Chang & Tong Zou & Pibin Guo, 2024. "Quantitative Evaluation of China’s Energy Transition Policy Since the 14th Five-Year Plan, Based on the MLP-PMC Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Xie, Li & Zhou, Zhichao & Hui, Shimin, 2022. "Does environmental regulation improve the structure of power generation technology? Evidence from China's pilot policy on the carbon emissions trading market(CETM)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. Li, Junjie & Zhang, Yueling & Yang, Yanli & Zhang, Xiaomei & Zheng, Yonghong & Qian, Qi & Tian, Yajun & Xie, Kechang, 2022. "Comparative resource-environment-economy assessment of coal- and oil-based aromatics production," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Wu, Shengyang & Ding, Zhaohao & Wang, Jingyu & Shi, Dongyuan, 2023. "Unveiling bidding uncertainties in electricity markets: A Bayesian deep learning framework based on accurate variational inference," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    20. Chaobo Zhou & Jingchan Wang & Zhiwei Wu, 2024. "Impact of China’s Energy-Consuming Right Trading on Urban Land Green Utilization Efficiency," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5884-:d:1527741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.