IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v203y2020ics0360544220308446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative assessment of advanced power generation and carbon sequestration plants on offshore petroleum platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Nascimento Silva, Fernanda Cristina
  • Alkmin Freire, Ronaldo Lucas
  • Flórez-Orrego, Daniel
  • de Oliveira Junior, Silvio

Abstract

On conventional offshore petroleum platforms, the combined heat and power production (CHP) currently depends on simple cycle gas turbine systems (SCGT) that operate at lower efficiency and increased environmental impact compared to modern onshore thermoelectric plants. Additionally, the reduced space and the limited weight budget on offshore platforms have discouraged operators from integrating more efficient, but also bulkier cogeneration cycles (e.g. combined cycles). In spite of these circumstances, more stringent environmental regulations of offshore oil and gas activities have progressively led to a renewed interest in the integration of advanced cogeneration systems, together with either customary or unconventional carbon capture approaches, to maintain both higher power generation efficiencies and reduced CO2 emissions. Thus, in this paper, it is evidenced how advanced gas turbine concepts are promising technologies for maintaining or even increasing efficiency, while facilitating the capture rate of CO2 produced, either for geological storage or enhanced oil recovery. Despite the profuse research works on onshore applications, advanced cogeneration and carbon capture systems have been barely studied in the context of supplying power to offshore petroleum platforms. Accordingly, the performance of a conventional offshore petroleum production platform (without carbon capture system) is compared to other configurations, based on either an amine-based chemical absorption system or oxyfuel combustion concepts ( S-Graz and Allam cycles) for CO2 capture purposes. Since the original power and heat requirements of the processing platform must remain satisfied, an energy integration analysis is performed to determine the waste heat recovery opportunities. Additionally, the exergy method helps quantifying the most critical components that lead to the largest irreversibility and identifying the thermodynamic potential for enhanced cogeneration plants. As a result, oxyfuel equipped platforms provide a diversified set of advantages, while keeping competitive efficiencies. For instance, advanced systems allow for cutting down ostensibly the atmospheric CO2 emissions compared to the conventional and amine-based power plant configurations of the FPSO.

Suggested Citation

  • Nascimento Silva, Fernanda Cristina & Alkmin Freire, Ronaldo Lucas & Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2020. "Comparative assessment of advanced power generation and carbon sequestration plants on offshore petroleum platforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:203:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220308446
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220308446
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2016. "On the efficiency, exergy costs and CO2 emission cost allocation for an integrated syngas and ammonia production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 341-360.
    2. Christophe McGlade & Paul Ekins, 2015. "The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C," Nature, Nature, vol. 517(7533), pages 187-190, January.
    3. van der Ham, L.V. & Gross, J. & Kjelstrup, S., 2011. "Two performance indicators for the characterization of the entropy production in a process unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3727-3732.
    4. Carranza Sánchez, Yamid Alberto & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2015. "Exergy analysis of offshore primary petroleum processing plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 46-56.
    5. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Fülöp, Tamás Gábor & Breuhaus, Peter & Elmegaard, Brian, 2014. "Life performance of oil and gas platforms: Site integration and thermodynamic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 282-301.
    6. Abdollahi-Demneh, Farzad & Moosavian, Mohammad Ali & Omidkhah, Mohammad Reza & Bahmanyar, Hossein, 2011. "Calculating exergy in flowsheeting simulators: A HYSYS implementation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5320-5327.
    7. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Voldsund, Mari & Elmegaard, Brian & Ertesvåg, Ivar Ståle & Kjelstrup, Signe, 2014. "On the definition of exergy efficiencies for petroleum systems: Application to offshore oil and gas processing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 264-281.
    8. Zappa, William & Junginger, Martin & van den Broek, Machteld, 2019. "Is a 100% renewable European power system feasible by 2050?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1027-1050.
    9. Suphanit, B., 2010. "Design of internally heat-integrated distillation column (HIDiC): Uniform heat transfer area versus uniform heat distribution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1505-1514.
    10. Silva, J.A.M. & Oliveira, S., 2014. "An exergy-based approach to determine production cost and CO2 allocation in refineries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 607-616.
    11. Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Caramanna, Giorgio & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2014. "An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 426-443.
    12. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2012. "Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 60-68.
    13. Silva, J.A.M. & Flórez-Orrego, D. & Oliveira, S., 2014. "An exergy based approach to determine production cost and CO2 allocation for petroleum derived fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 490-495.
    14. da Silva, Julio A.M. & de Oliveira Junior, S., 2018. "Unit exergy cost and CO2 emissions of offshore petroleum production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 757-766.
    15. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Voldsund, Mari & Breuhaus, Peter & Elmegaard, Brian, 2016. "Energy efficiency measures for offshore oil and gas platforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 325-340.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. da Silva, Vinícius Oliveira & Relva, Stefania Gomes & Mondragon, Marcella & Mendes, André Bergsten & Nishimoto, Kazuo & Peyerl, Drielli, 2023. "Building Options for the Brazilian Pre-salt: A technical-economic and infrastructure analysis of offshore integration between energy generation and natural gas exploration," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Silva Ortiz, Pablo & Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Osseweijer, Patricia & Posada, John, 2020. "Unit exergy cost and specific CO2 emissions of the electricity generation in the Netherlands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    3. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & Albuquerque, Cyro & da Silva, Julio A.M. & Freire, Ronaldo Lucas Alkmin & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2021. "Optimal design of power hubs for offshore petroleum platforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2017. "Modeling and optimization of an industrial ammonia synthesis unit: An exergy approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 234-250.
    2. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & Henriques, Izabela B. & Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Mendes da Silva, Julio A. & Keutenedjian Mady, Carlos E. & Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & Gandolfi, Ricardo & Velasquez, Hector I. & Burb, 2018. "The contributions of Prof. Jan Szargut to the exergy and environmental assessment of complex energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 482-492.
    3. da Silva, Julio A.M. & de Oliveira Junior, S., 2018. "Unit exergy cost and CO2 emissions of offshore petroleum production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 757-766.
    4. Anan Zhang & Hong Zhang & Meysam Qadrdan & Wei Yang & Xiaolong Jin & Jianzhong Wu, 2019. "Optimal Planning of Integrated Energy Systems for Offshore Oil Extraction and Processing Platforms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2016. "On the efficiency, exergy costs and CO2 emission cost allocation for an integrated syngas and ammonia production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 341-360.
    6. Barrera, Julian Esteban & Bazzo, Edson & Kami, Eduardo, 2015. "Exergy analysis and energy improvement of a Brazilian floating oil platform using Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 67-79.
    7. Barbosa, Yuri M. & da Silva, Julio A.M. & Junior, Silvio de O. & Torres, Ednildo A., 2018. "Performance assessment of primary petroleum production cogeneration plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 233-244.
    8. Silva Ortiz, Pablo & Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Osseweijer, Patricia & Posada, John, 2020. "Unit exergy cost and specific CO2 emissions of the electricity generation in the Netherlands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    9. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2017. "Exergy assessment of single and dual pressure industrial ammonia synthesis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2540-2558.
    10. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jeremy Fouillou & Richard C. Lupton & Ana Gonzalez Hernandez & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Calculating the chemical exergy of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 274-287, April.
    11. Luca Riboldi & Lars O. Nord, 2017. "Lifetime Assessment of Combined Cycles for Cogeneration of Power and Heat in Offshore Oil and Gas Installations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2022. "Dynamic exergy analysis: From industrial data to exergy flows," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 12-26, February.
    13. Carranza Sánchez, Yamid Alberto & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2015. "Exergy analysis of offshore primary petroleum processing plant with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 46-56.
    14. Chen, Shiqing & Dong, Xuezhi & Xu, Jian & Zhang, Hualiang & Gao, Qing & Tan, Chunqing, 2019. "Thermodynamic evaluation of the novel distillation column of the air separation unit with integration of liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 341-359.
    15. Mahian, Omid & Mahmud, Shohel & Heris, Saeed Zeinali, 2012. "Analysis of entropy generation between co-rotating cylinders using nanofluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 438-446.
    16. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & Nascimento Silva, Fernanda & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2019. "Syngas production with thermo-chemically recuperated gas expansion systems: An exergy analysis and energy integration study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 293-308.
    17. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & de Oliveira Júnior, Silvio, 2018. "Life performance of oil and gas platforms for various production profiles and feed compositions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 583-594.
    18. Nami, Hossein & Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Agromayor, Roberto & Riboldi, Luca & Nord, Lars O., 2018. "Gas turbine exhaust gas heat recovery by organic Rankine cycles (ORC) for offshore combined heat and power applications - Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1060-1071.
    19. Liu, Ming & Tan, Lei & Cao, Shuliang, 2020. "Influence of viscosity on energy performance and flow field of a multiphase pump," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1151-1160.
    20. Moradi Nasab, N. & Amin-Naseri, M.R., 2016. "Designing an integrated model for a multi-period, multi-echelon and multi-product petroleum supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 708-733.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:203:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220308446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.