IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v178y2019icp293-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Syngas production with thermo-chemically recuperated gas expansion systems: An exergy analysis and energy integration study

Author

Listed:
  • Flórez-Orrego, Daniel
  • Nascimento Silva, Fernanda
  • de Oliveira Junior, Silvio

Abstract

In spite of the large degree of energy integration in the modern syngas production units, the highly endothermic reactions of steam methane reforming and the combined steam and power generation still require a huge amount of energy that is typically supplied by an expensive natural gas-fired furnace at very high temperatures. Since normally only half of the energy supplied by the furnace is used to carry out the reforming reactions, the remaining heat recovery must be performed in a separate convection train (HRCT). Additionally, the high temperature effluent of the secondary reformer is generally cooled down by producing low temperature steam, increasing the process irreversibility and the losses associated to the excessive amount of condensate. Thus, in this paper, the advantages of introducing a chemically recuperated gas turbine (CRGT) concept to simultaneously carry out the endothermic chemical reactions and recover the exergy available from the autothermal reformer effluent are discussed. In this way, higher temperatures and higher conversions can be attained with lower driving forces. The power required by the air compression as well as other ancillary systems (e.g. air separation unit, carbon capture system, boiler feedwater pumps and recompressor) can also be supplied, while the exergy of the exhaust gases from the turbine is used more efficiently than in typical steam generation systems. Thus, more compact and integrated syngas production plants can be envisaged. Moreover, by introducing more advanced cogeneration features such as air enrichment, process gas reheating and incremental levels of pressures in the reaction-driven components, energy savings together with drastically reduced atmospheric CO2 emissions and irreversibility can be achieved in the frontend syngas production section. As a result, the average specific exergy destruction and exergy fuel consumption of the proposed CRGT-based configurations are, respectively, 12.0% and 2.7% lower, whereas the specific atmospheric CO2 emissions are cut down up to 25%, when compared to the conventional syngas production process.

Suggested Citation

  • Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & Nascimento Silva, Fernanda & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2019. "Syngas production with thermo-chemically recuperated gas expansion systems: An exergy analysis and energy integration study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 293-308.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:178:y:2019:i:c:p:293-308
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219307807
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leites, I.L. & Sama, D.A. & Lior, N., 2003. "The theory and practice of energy saving in the chemical industry: some methods for reducing thermodynamic irreversibility in chemical technology processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 55-97.
    2. Greeff, I.L. & Visser, J.A. & Ptasinski, K.J. & Janssen, F.J.J.G., 2004. "Using turbine expanders to recover exothermic reaction heat—flow sheet development for typical chemical processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2045-2060.
    3. Frattini, D. & Cinti, G. & Bidini, G. & Desideri, U. & Cioffi, R. & Jannelli, E., 2016. "A system approach in energy evaluation of different renewable energies sources integration in ammonia production plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 472-482.
    4. Cornelissen, R. & Tober, E. & Kok, J. & van de Meer, T., 2006. "Generation of synthesis gas by partial oxidation of natural gas in a gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3199-3207.
    5. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2016. "On the efficiency, exergy costs and CO2 emission cost allocation for an integrated syngas and ammonia production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 341-360.
    6. Greeff, I.L. & Visser, J.A. & Ptasinski, K.J. & Janssen, F.J.J.G., 2003. "Integration of a turbine expander with an exothermic reactor loop—Flow sheet development and application to ammonia production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 1495-1509.
    7. Lior, Noam & Zhang, Na, 2007. "Energy, exergy, and Second Law performance criteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 281-296.
    8. Abdollahi-Demneh, Farzad & Moosavian, Mohammad Ali & Omidkhah, Mohammad Reza & Bahmanyar, Hossein, 2011. "Calculating exergy in flowsheeting simulators: A HYSYS implementation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5320-5327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tola, Vittorio & Lonis, Francesco, 2021. "Low CO2 emissions chemically recuperated gas turbines fed by renewable methanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Pashchenko, Dmitry, 2022. "Natural gas reforming in thermochemical waste-heat recuperation systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    3. Huang, Zhi & Su, Bosheng & Wang, Yilin & Yuan, Shuo & Huang, Yupeng & Li, Liang & Cai, Jiahao & Chen, Zhiqiang, 2024. "A novel biogas-driven CCHP system based on chemical reinjection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    4. Greeff, Isabella L., 2022. "Using synthesis gas heat to produce work via an externally fired gas power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2017. "Modeling and optimization of an industrial ammonia synthesis unit: An exergy approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 234-250.
    2. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2017. "Exergy assessment of single and dual pressure industrial ammonia synthesis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2540-2558.
    3. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2016. "On the efficiency, exergy costs and CO2 emission cost allocation for an integrated syngas and ammonia production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 341-360.
    4. Ghannadzadeh, Ali & Thery-Hetreux, Raphaële & Baudouin, Olivier & Baudet, Philippe & Floquet, Pascal & Joulia, Xavier, 2012. "General methodology for exergy balance in ProSimPlus® process simulator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 38-59.
    5. Greeff, Isabella L., 2022. "Using synthesis gas heat to produce work via an externally fired gas power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    6. Sanjay,, 2011. "Investigation of effect of variation of cycle parameters on thermodynamic performance of gas-steam combined cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 157-167.
    7. Nascimento Silva, Fernanda Cristina & Alkmin Freire, Ronaldo Lucas & Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2020. "Comparative assessment of advanced power generation and carbon sequestration plants on offshore petroleum platforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Chen, Shiyi & Lior, Noam & Xiang, Wenguo, 2015. "Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 298-312.
    9. Chen, Yuhong & Lyu, Yanfeng & Yang, Xiangdong & Zhang, Xiaohong & Pan, Hengyu & Wu, Jun & Lei, Yongjia & Zhang, Yanzong & Wang, Guiyin & Xu, Min & Luo, Hongbin, 2022. "Performance comparison of urea production using one set of integrated indicators considering energy use, economic cost and emissions’ impacts: A case from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    10. Aslambakhsh, Amir Hamzeh & Moosavian, Mohammad Ali & Amidpour, Majid & Hosseini, Mohammad & AmirAfshar, Saeedeh, 2018. "Global cost optimization of a mini-scale liquefied natural gas plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1191-1200.
    11. Toghyani, Mahboubeh & Rahimi, Amir, 2015. "Exergy analysis of an industrial unit of catalyst regeneration based on the results of modeling and simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1049-1056.
    12. Hong, Gui-Bing & Ma, Chih-Ming & Chen, Hua-Wei & Chuang, Kai-Jen & Chang, Chang-Tang & Su, Te-Li, 2011. "Energy flow analysis in pulp and paper industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3063-3068.
    13. Miladi, Rihab & Frikha, Nader & Gabsi, Slimane, 2017. "Exergy analysis of a solar-powered vacuum membrane distillation unit using two models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 872-883.
    14. Rosner, Fabian & Chen, Qin & Rao, Ashok & Samuelsen, Scott, 2020. "Thermo-economic analyses of isothermal water gas shift reactor integrations into IGCC power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    15. Charalampos Michalakakis & Jeremy Fouillou & Richard C. Lupton & Ana Gonzalez Hernandez & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Calculating the chemical exergy of materials," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 274-287, April.
    16. Lee, Sanghun & Kim, Taehong & Han, Gwangwoo & Kang, Sungmin & Yoo, Young-Sung & Jeon, Sang-Yun & Bae, Joongmyeon, 2021. "Comparative energetic studies on liquid organic hydrogen carrier: A net energy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Yan, Rujing & Wang, Jiangjiang & Wang, Jiahao & Tian, Lei & Tang, Saiqiu & Wang, Yuwei & Zhang, Jing & Cheng, Youliang & Li, Yuan, 2022. "A two-stage stochastic-robust optimization for a hybrid renewable energy CCHP system considering multiple scenario-interval uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    18. Chu, Fengming & Yang, Lijun & Du, Xiaoze & Yang, Yongping, 2016. "CO2 capture using MEA (monoethanolamine) aqueous solution in coal-fired power plants: Modeling and optimization of the absorbing columns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 495-505.
    19. Kumar, Vikash, 2021. "Experimental investigation of exergetic efficiency of 3 side concave dimple roughened absorbers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    20. Arabkoohsar, A. & Farzaneh-Gord, M. & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, M. & Machado, L. & Koury, R.N.N., 2015. "A new design for natural gas pressure reduction points by employing a turbo expander and a solar heating set," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 239-250.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:178:y:2019:i:c:p:293-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.