IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v36y2011i6p3727-3732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two performance indicators for the characterization of the entropy production in a process unit

Author

Listed:
  • van der Ham, L.V.
  • Gross, J.
  • Kjelstrup, S.

Abstract

Two indicators are presented to compare the Second law performances of different design-variants of the same process unit. The first indicator relates the entropy production to quantities like the total transferred thermal energy and the total chemical conversion. This allows a useful comparison, even in the case of different inlets and outlets. An important aspect of the entropy production in a process unit is its distribution. An even distribution, also known as equipartition of entropy production (EoEP), is related to an optimal design. The second indicator is based on the coefficient of variation of a local entropy production profile and allows one to calculate and compare degrees of equipartition of different designs. Both indicators have been used in a study on the entropy production minimization of a plug-flow reactor. A comparison using the first indicator showed that the optimized reactors perform slightly better than a comparison based on the total entropy production alone would suggest. This shows that the total entropy production is not always a good indicator. The second indicator was found to provide an excellent numerical basis for comparing the degrees of EoEP of the different designs.

Suggested Citation

  • van der Ham, L.V. & Gross, J. & Kjelstrup, S., 2011. "Two performance indicators for the characterization of the entropy production in a process unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3727-3732.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:6:p:3727-3732
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.11.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210006389
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2010.11.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannessen, Eivind & Kjelstrup, Signe, 2004. "Minimum entropy production rate in plug flow reactors: An optimal control problem solved for SO2 oxidation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2403-2423.
    2. Leites, I.L. & Sama, D.A. & Lior, N., 2003. "The theory and practice of energy saving in the chemical industry: some methods for reducing thermodynamic irreversibility in chemical technology processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 55-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2017. "Modeling and optimization of an industrial ammonia synthesis unit: An exergy approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 234-250.
    2. Mahian, Omid & Mahmud, Shohel & Heris, Saeed Zeinali, 2012. "Analysis of entropy generation between co-rotating cylinders using nanofluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 438-446.
    3. Nascimento Silva, Fernanda Cristina & Alkmin Freire, Ronaldo Lucas & Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2020. "Comparative assessment of advanced power generation and carbon sequestration plants on offshore petroleum platforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Vilanova, Mateus Ricardo Nogueira & Balestieri, José Antônio Perrella, 2015. "Modeling of hydraulic and energy efficiency indicators for water supply systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 540-557.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2017. "Exergy assessment of single and dual pressure industrial ammonia synthesis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2540-2558.
    2. Toghyani, Mahboubeh & Rahimi, Amir, 2015. "Exergy analysis of an industrial unit of catalyst regeneration based on the results of modeling and simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1049-1056.
    3. Hong, Gui-Bing & Ma, Chih-Ming & Chen, Hua-Wei & Chuang, Kai-Jen & Chang, Chang-Tang & Su, Te-Li, 2011. "Energy flow analysis in pulp and paper industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3063-3068.
    4. Khoa, T.D. & Shuhaimi, M. & Hashim, H. & Panjeshahi, M.H., 2010. "Optimal design of distillation column using three dimensional exergy analysis curves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5309-5319.
    5. Enrico Sciubba, 2014. "A Critical Interpretation and Quantitative Extension of the Sama-Szargut Second Law Rules in an Extended Exergy Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Geuzebroek, F.H. & Schneiders, L.H.J.M. & Kraaijveld, G.J.C. & Feron, P.H.M., 2004. "Exergy analysis of alkanolamine-based CO2 removal unit with AspenPlus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1241-1248.
    7. Xia, Shaojun & Chen, Lingen & Sun, Fengrui, 2011. "Power-optimization of non-ideal energy converters under generalized convective heat transfer law via Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 633-646.
    8. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2016. "On the efficiency, exergy costs and CO2 emission cost allocation for an integrated syngas and ammonia production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 341-360.
    9. Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Madejski, Paweł & Ziółkowski, Paweł & Mikielewicz, Dariusz, 2023. "Exergy analysis of a negative CO2 emission gas power plant based on water oxy-combustion of syngas from sewage sludge gasification and CCS," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    10. Ghannadzadeh, Ali & Thery-Hetreux, Raphaële & Baudouin, Olivier & Baudet, Philippe & Floquet, Pascal & Joulia, Xavier, 2012. "General methodology for exergy balance in ProSimPlus® process simulator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 38-59.
    11. Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Kvamsdal, Hanne M. & Bolland, Olav, 2005. "Exergy analysis of a gas-turbine combined-cycle power plant with precombustion CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 5-39.
    12. Halmann, M. & Steinfeld, A., 2006. "Fuel saving, carbon dioxide emission avoidance, and syngas production by tri-reforming of flue gases from coal- and gas-fired power stations, and by the carbothermic reduction of iron oxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3171-3185.
    13. Chen, Lingen & Zhang, Lei & Xia, Shaojun & Sun, Fengrui, 2018. "Entropy generation minimization for CO2 hydrogenation to light olefins," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 187-196.
    14. Sanjay,, 2011. "Investigation of effect of variation of cycle parameters on thermodynamic performance of gas-steam combined cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 157-167.
    15. Flórez-Orrego, Daniel & de Oliveira Junior, Silvio, 2017. "Modeling and optimization of an industrial ammonia synthesis unit: An exergy approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 234-250.
    16. Reddick, Christopher & Sorin, Mikhail & Rheault, Fernand, 2014. "Energy savings in CO2 (carbon dioxide) capture using ejectors for waste heat upgrading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 200-208.
    17. Røsjorde, A. & Kjelstrup, S. & Johannessen, E. & Hansen, R., 2007. "Minimizing the entropy production in a chemical process for dehydrogenation of propane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 335-343.
    18. Chen, Shiyi & Lior, Noam & Xiang, Wenguo, 2015. "Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 298-312.
    19. Sciacovelli, A. & Verda, V. & Sciubba, E., 2015. "Entropy generation analysis as a design tool—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1167-1181.
    20. Rosner, Fabian & Chen, Qin & Rao, Ashok & Samuelsen, Scott, 2020. "Thermo-economic analyses of isothermal water gas shift reactor integrations into IGCC power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:36:y:2011:i:6:p:3727-3732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.