IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v174y2019icp625-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kalina power plant part load modeling: Comparison of different approaches to model part load behavior and validation on real operating data

Author

Listed:
  • Dawo, Fabian
  • Wieland, Christoph
  • Spliethoff, Hartmut

Abstract

Geothermal energy can play a vital role in the mitigation of climate change due to its CO2-neutral, renewable and non-fluctuating character. Because of the expensive preparation of the geothermal wells, the thermal water should be utilized with the highest efficiency. Therefore, the wells are often exploited in combined heat and power concepts. Consequently, the power plant operates in part load most of the time. However, this high portion of part load operation is often not fully considered in the design stage of the plant, due to a lack of suitable simulation models. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to compare several approaches to simulate the part load behavior of the geothermal Kalina power plant in Unterhaching (Germany) and to validate them with operational data. Simulation approaches to calculate the isentropic efficiency of the turbine and the heat transfer coefficients of the heat exchangers are studied and compared on component level. An investigation of different combinations of these component models then follows. The results show that a detailed correlation to model the isentropic efficiency of the turbine is necessary to achieve sufficient accuracy. Furthermore, modeling plate heat exchangers with a power law approach for the heat transfer coefficient appears promising.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawo, Fabian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Kalina power plant part load modeling: Comparison of different approaches to model part load behavior and validation on real operating data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 625-637.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:174:y:2019:i:c:p:625-637
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219303792
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wieland, Christoph & Meinel, Dominik & Eyerer, Sebastian & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2016. "Innovative CHP concept for ORC and its benefit compared to conventional concepts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 478-490.
    2. Thorsten Agemar & Josef Weber & Rüdiger Schulz, 2014. "Deep Geothermal Energy Production in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Mergner, Hanna & Schaber, Karlheinz, 2018. "Performance analysis of an evaporation process of plate heat exchangers installed in a Kalina power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 105-115.
    4. Wang, Jianyong & Wang, Jiangfeng & Dai, Yiping & Zhao, Pan, 2017. "Assessment of off-design performance of a Kalina cycle driven by low-grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 459-472.
    5. Francesco Calise & Davide Capuano & Laura Vanoli, 2015. "Dynamic Simulation and Exergo-Economic Optimization of a Hybrid Solar–Geothermal Cogeneration Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-41, April.
    6. Dickes, Rémi & Dumont, Olivier & Daccord, Rémi & Quoilin, Sylvain & Lemort, Vincent, 2017. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle power systems in off-design conditions: An experimentally-validated comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 710-727.
    7. Zhang, Xinxin & He, Maogang & Zhang, Ying, 2012. "A review of research on the Kalina cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5309-5318.
    8. Fiaschi, Daniele & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Maraschiello, Francesco, 2015. "Design and performance prediction of radial ORC turboexpanders," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 517-532.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khanmohammadi, Shoaib & Saadat-Targhi, Morteza & Nabati, Amin, 2022. "Energy and exergy analyses of a new integrated system for textile factory using geothermal energy source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    2. Dawo, Fabian & Eyerer, Sebastian & Pili, Roberto & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2021. "Experimental investigation, model validation and application of twin-screw expanders with different built-in volume ratios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    3. Schifflechner, Christopher & Kuhnert, Lara & Irrgang, Ludwig & Dawo, Fabian & Kaufmann, Florian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2023. "Geothermal trigeneration systems with Organic Rankine Cycles: Evaluation of different plant configurations considering part load behaviour," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 218-233.
    4. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Advanced ORC architecture for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Zhang, Xinxin & Li, Yingzhen, 2024. "Recommended operating conditions and performance evaluation of commonly used hydrofluoroolefin (HFO) and hydrochlorofluoroolefin (HCFO) refrigerants in organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    6. Eyerer, S. & Schifflechner, C. & Hofbauer, S. & Bauer, W. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Kazemiani-Najafabadi, Parisa & Amiri Rad, Ehsan, 2020. "Optimization of an improved power cycle for geothermal applications in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Pili, R. & Eyerer, S. & Dawo, F. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Development of a non-linear state estimator for advanced control of an ORC test rig for geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 676-690.
    9. Cheng, Ziyang & Wang, Jiangfeng & Yang, Peijun & Wang, Yaxiong & Chen, Gang & Zhao, Pan & Dai, Yiping, 2022. "Comparison of control strategies and dynamic behaviour analysis of a Kalina cycle driven by a low-grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Schifflechner, Christopher & Dawo, Fabian & Eyerer, Sebastian & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2020. "Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1292-1302.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyoung Hoon Kim & Chul Ho Han & Hyung Jong Ko, 2018. "Comparative Thermodynamic Analysis of Kalina and Kalina Flash Cycles for Utilizing Low-Grade Heat Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Chen, Ruihua & Deng, Shuai & Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li, 2020. "A graphic analysis method of electrochemical systems for low-grade heat harvesting from a perspective of thermodynamic cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Cheng, Ziyang & Wang, Jiangfeng & Hu, Bin & Chen, Liangqi & Lou, Juwei & Cheng, Shangfang & Wu, Weifeng, 2024. "Improved modelling for ammonia-water power cycle coupled with turbine optimization design: A comparison study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Kalina, Jacek & Świerzewski, Mateusz, 2019. "Identification of ORC unit operation in biomass-fired cogeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 400-414.
    5. Eyerer, S. & Schifflechner, C. & Hofbauer, S. & Bauer, W. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Dumont, Olivier & Parthoens, Antoine & Dickes, Rémi & Lemort, Vincent, 2018. "Experimental investigation and optimal performance assessment of four volumetric expanders (scroll, screw, piston and roots) tested in a small-scale organic Rankine cycle system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 1119-1127.
    7. Du, Yang & Dai, Yiping, 2018. "Off-design performance analysis of a power-cooling cogeneration system combining a Kalina cycle with an ejector refrigeration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 233-250.
    8. Banks, Jonathan & Rabbani, Arif & Nadkarni, Kabir & Renaud, Evan, 2020. "Estimating parasitic loads related to brine production from a hot sedimentary aquifer geothermal project: A case study from the Clarke Lake gas field, British Columbia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 539-552.
    9. Dereje S. Ayou & Valerie Eveloy, 2020. "Integration of Municipal Air-Conditioning, Power, and Gas Supplies Using an LNG Cold Exergy-Assisted Kalina Cycle System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-31, September.
    10. Huster, Wolfgang R. & Schweidtmann, Artur M. & Mitsos, Alexander, 2020. "Globally optimal working fluid mixture composition for geothermal power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    11. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Yoon, Jung-In & Seol, Sung-Hoon & Son, Chang-Hyo & Jung, Suk-Ho & Kim, Young-Bok & Lee, Ho-Saeng & Kim, Hyeon-Ju & Moon, Jung-Hyun, 2017. "Analysis of the high-efficiency EP-OTEC cycle using R152a," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 366-373.
    13. Roberto Pili & Hartmut Spliethoff & Christoph Wieland, 2017. "Dynamic Simulation of an Organic Rankine Cycle—Detailed Model of a Kettle Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    14. Calise, Francesco & Dentice d'Accadia, Massimo & Libertini, Luigi & Quiriti, Edoardo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2017. "A novel tool for thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of trigeneration systems: A case study for a hospital building in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 64-87.
    15. Xi, Huan & Zhang, Honghu & He, Ya-Ling & Huang, Zuohua, 2019. "Sensitivity analysis of operation parameters on the system performance of organic rankine cycle system using orthogonal experiment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 435-442.
    16. Strobel, Gion & Hagemann, Birger & Huppertz, Thiago Martins & Ganzer, Leonhard, 2020. "Underground bio-methanation: Concept and potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    17. Davide Toselli & Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2019. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hybrid Binary Cycles with Geothermal Energy and Biogas Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Zhu, Sipeng & Ma, Zetai & Zhang, Kun & Deng, Kangyao, 2020. "Energy and exergy analysis of the combined cycle power plant recovering waste heat from the marine two-stroke engine under design and off-design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Gaetano Morgese & Francesco Fornarelli & Paolo Oresta & Tommaso Capurso & Michele Stefanizzi & Sergio M. Camporeale & Marco Torresi, 2020. "Fast Design Procedure for Turboexpanders in Pressure Energy Recovery Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-26, July.
    20. Majorowicz, Jacek & Grasby, Stephen E., 2019. "Deep geothermal energy in Canadian sedimentary basins VS. Fossils based energy we try to replace – Exergy [KJ/KG] compared," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 259-277.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:174:y:2019:i:c:p:625-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.