IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v172y2019icp509-516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valorization of eucalyptus urograndis wood via carbonization: Product yields and characterization

Author

Listed:
  • Silva, F.T.M.
  • Ataíde, C.H.

Abstract

Brazil has a well-developed forest sector and is the largest producer of charcoal in the world in addition to being one of the main producers of wood. A big part of this production is destined to the steel industry. However, approximately 30 wt% of all wood energy is transformed into charcoal, and the other 70 wt% consisting of condensable and non-condensable gases (NCG) emitted in the atmosphere generating pollution and energy waste. With the purpose of altering this scenario, the present project, undertaken in laboratory scale from muffle furnace, saught as its main objective to carbonize species of Eucalyptus urograndis. Charcoal physical-chemical characterization, bio-oil and (NCG) produced by the process have also been done. In parallel, the performance of some operational variables (heating rate and final carbonization temperature) have been analyzed which affect the process of charcoal production through experimental design. The average income in charcoal, bio-oil and NCG has reached values of approximately 32.6, 40.1 and 27.3 wt% respectively. To obtain a quality charcoal as in the quantitative point of view (yield), as to the qualitative point of view (performance in fixed carbon and low friability), it must operate at a lower heating rate and milder final carbonization temperatures.

Suggested Citation

  • Silva, F.T.M. & Ataíde, C.H., 2019. "Valorization of eucalyptus urograndis wood via carbonization: Product yields and characterization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 509-516.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:509-516
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219301756
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anupam, Kumar & Sharma, Arvind Kumar & Lal, Priti Shivhare & Dutta, Suman & Maity, Sudip, 2016. "Preparation, characterization and optimization for upgrading Leucaena leucocephala bark to biochar fuel with high energy yielding," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 743-756.
    2. Williams, Paul T. & Besler, Serpil, 1996. "The influence of temperature and heating rate on the slow pyrolysis of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 233-250.
    3. Wilk, Małgorzata & Magdziarz, Aneta & Kalemba, Izabela & Gara, Paweł, 2016. "Carbonisation of wood residue into charcoal during low temperature process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 507-513.
    4. Qi, Jianhui & Han, Kuihua & Wang, Qian & Gao, Jie, 2017. "Carbonization of biomass: Effect of additives on alkali metals residue, SO2 and NO emission of chars during combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 560-569.
    5. Sheinbaum-Pardo, Claudia & Ruiz, Belizza J., 2012. "Energy context in Latin America," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 39-46.
    6. Qi, Jianhui & Zhao, Jianli & Xu, Yang & Wang, Yongjia & Han, Kuihua, 2018. "Segmented heating carbonization of biomass: Yields, property and estimation of heating value of chars," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 301-311.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Paula Protásio, Thiago & Roque Lima, Michael Douglas & Scatolino, Mário Vanoli & Silva, Alanna Barishinikov & Rodrigues de Figueiredo, Izabel Cristina & Gherardi Hein, Paulo Ricardo & Trugilho, Pau, 2021. "Charcoal productivity and quality parameters for reliable classification of Eucalyptus clones from Brazilian energy forests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 34-45.
    2. Helberth Júnnior Santos Lopes & Nemailla Bonturi & Everson Alves Miranda, 2020. "Rhodotorula toruloides Single Cell Oil Production Using Eucalyptus urograndis Hemicellulose Hydrolysate as a Carbon Source," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Antão Rodrigo Valentim & Jhon Ramírez Behainne & Aldo Braghini Junior, 2022. "Thermal Performance Analysis of Materials and Configurations for Cylindrical Sidewalls of Charcoal Kilns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nobre, Catarina & Vilarinho, Cândida & Alves, Octávio & Mendes, Benilde & Gonçalves, Margarida, 2019. "Upgrading of refuse derived fuel through torrefaction and carbonization: Evaluation of RDF char fuel properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 66-76.
    2. Suopajärvi, Hannu & Umeki, Kentaro & Mousa, Elsayed & Hedayati, Ali & Romar, Henrik & Kemppainen, Antti & Wang, Chuan & Phounglamcheik, Aekjuthon & Tuomikoski, Sari & Norberg, Nicklas & Andefors, Alf , 2018. "Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking – Status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO2 steel production technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 384-407.
    3. Jianhui Qi & Haopeng Li & Qian Wang & Kuihua Han, 2021. "Combustion Characteristics, Kinetics, SO 2 and NO Release of Low-Grade Biomass Materials and Briquettes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Qi, Jianhui & Zhao, Jianli & Xu, Yang & Wang, Yongjia & Han, Kuihua, 2018. "Segmented heating carbonization of biomass: Yields, property and estimation of heating value of chars," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 301-311.
    5. Garfí, Marianna & Martí-Herrero, Jaime & Garwood, Anna & Ferrer, Ivet, 2016. "Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 599-614.
    6. Aragón-Briceño, C.I. & Pozarlik, A.K. & Bramer, E.A. & Niedzwiecki, Lukasz & Pawlak-Kruczek, H. & Brem, G., 2021. "Hydrothermal carbonization of wet biomass from nitrogen and phosphorus approach: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 401-415.
    7. Granada, E. & Eguía, P. & Vilan, J.A. & Comesaña, J.A. & Comesaña, R., 2012. "FTIR quantitative analysis technique for gases. Application in a biomass thermochemical process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 416-421.
    8. Amutio, M. & Lopez, G. & Artetxe, M. & Elordi, G. & Olazar, M. & Bilbao, J., 2012. "Influence of temperature on biomass pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 23-31.
    9. Parisa Heidarnejad & Hadi Genceli & Nasim Hashemian & Mustafa Asker & Mohammad Al-Rawi, 2024. "Biomass-Fueled Organic Rankine Cycles: State of the Art and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, August.
    10. Alexander Gorshkov & Nikolay Berezikov & Albert Kaltaev & Stanislav Yankovsky & Konstantin Slyusarsky & Roman Tabakaev & Kirill Larionov, 2021. "Analysis of the Physicochemical Characteristics of Biochar Obtained by Slow Pyrolysis of Nut Shells in a Nitrogen Atmosphere," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Yaxin Ge & Guangyi Zhang & Jianling Zhang & Wennan Zhang & Lijie Cui, 2022. "Emission Characteristics of NO x and SO 2 during the Combustion of Antibiotic Mycelial Residue," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Espinoza, R. & Muñoz-Cerón, E. & Aguilera, J. & de la Casa, J., 2019. "Feasibility evaluation of residential photovoltaic self-consumption projects in Peru," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 414-427.
    13. Collazo, Joaquín & Pazó, José Antonio & Granada, Enrique & Saavedra, Ángeles & Eguía, Pablo, 2012. "Determination of the specific heat of biomass materials and the combustion energy of coke by DSC analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 746-752.
    14. John Steven Devia-Orjuela & Christian E Alvarez-Pugliese & Dayana Donneys-Victoria & Nilson Marriaga Cabrales & Luz Edith Barba Ho & Balazs Brém & Anca Sauciuc & Emese Gál & Douglas Espin & Martin Sch, 2019. "Evaluation of Press Mud, Vinasse Powder and Extraction Sludge with Ethanol in a Pyrolysis Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Beis, S.H. & Onay, Ö. & Koçkar, Ö.M., 2002. "Fixed-bed pyrolysis of safflower seed: influence of pyrolysis parameters on product yields and compositions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 21-32.
    16. Bonassa, Gabriela & Schneider, Lara Talita & Canever, Victor Bruno & Cremonez, Paulo André & Frigo, Elisandro Pires & Dieter, Jonathan & Teleken, Joel Gustavo, 2018. "Scenarios and prospects of solid biofuel use in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2365-2378.
    17. Mika Pahnila & Aki Koskela & Petri Sulasalmi & Timo Fabritius, 2024. "Biocarbon Production Using Three-Stage Pyrolysis and Its Preliminary Suitability to the Iron and Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Zeng, Kuo & Soria, José & Gauthier, Daniel & Mazza, Germán & Flamant, Gilles, 2016. "Modeling of beech wood pellet pyrolysis under concentrated solar radiation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 721-729.
    19. Hasan, M.M. & Rasul, M.G. & Khan, M.M.K. & Ashwath, N. & Jahirul, M.I., 2021. "Energy recovery from municipal solid waste using pyrolysis technology: A review on current status and developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    20. Román-Collado, Rocío & Morales-Carrión, Any Viviana, 2018. "Towards a sustainable growth in Latin America: A multiregional spatial decomposition analysis of the driving forces behind CO2 emissions changes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 273-280.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:509-516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.