IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v141y2017icp1350-1362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy recovery and hygienic water production from wastewater using an innovative integrated microbial fuel cell–membrane separation process

Author

Listed:
  • Zinadini, S.
  • Zinatizadeh, A.A.
  • Rahimi, M.
  • Vatanpour, V.
  • Bahrami, K.

Abstract

In this study, wastewater treatment was destined for generation of electricity and hygienic water by an innovative integrated microbial fuel cell – membrane separation process (MFC-MSP). An optimal antifouling nanofiltration membrane (blended with O-carboxymethyl chitosan bound Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (CCFe3O4 NPs)), an antifouling ultrafiltration (UF) membrane (blended with polycitrate-alumoxane nanoparticle (PC-A)) and a high efficiency proton exchange membranes were applied in MSP and MFC processes. Firstly, the performance of MFC unit under different operating conditions of reaction time (RT), mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration and influent chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration was investigated in terms of COD removal efficiency and power generation for synthetic dairy wastewater treatment. The experiments were modeled using response surface methodology (RSM). The results indicated that by increasing in RT and CODin concentration, the COD removal was decreased. Also, the high concentration of MLSS in anodic chamber led to high COD removal efficiency. By increasing of MLSS beyond 3000 mg/L, the maximum power generation was decreased that reveals an adverse impact of biofouling on membrane performance. After primary treatment in anodic chamber of MFC at optimum condition, the anodic chamber effluent was passed through the membranes in two modes, direct nanofiltration (NF) membrane and UF-NF membranes in series. The results indicated that the UF membrane alleviated the organic loading of NF membrane by 72% relative to the direct NF filtration. The permeation flux shows a sustain performance of the NF when is coupled with UF membrane.a.

Suggested Citation

  • Zinadini, S. & Zinatizadeh, A.A. & Rahimi, M. & Vatanpour, V. & Bahrami, K., 2017. "Energy recovery and hygienic water production from wastewater using an innovative integrated microbial fuel cell–membrane separation process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1350-1362.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:141:y:2017:i:c:p:1350-1362
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217319060
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schilirò, T. & Tommasi, T. & Armato, C. & Hidalgo, D. & Traversi, D. & Bocchini, S. & Gilli, G. & Pirri, C.F., 2016. "The study of electrochemically active planktonic microbes in microbial fuel cells in relation to different carbon-based anode materials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 277-284.
    2. Ayyaru, Sivasankaran & Dharmalingam, Sangeetha, 2015. "A study of influence on nanocomposite membrane of sulfonated TiO2 and sulfonated polystyrene-ethylene-butylene-polystyrene for microbial fuel cell application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 202-208.
    3. Chen, Yingwen & Chen, Liuliu & Li, Peiwen & Xu, Yuan & Fan, Mengjie & Zhu, Shemin & Shen, Shubao, 2016. "Enhanced performance of microbial fuel cells by using MnO2/Halloysite nanotubes to modify carbon cloth anodes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 620-628.
    4. Zinadini, S. & Zinatizadeh, A.A. & Rahimi, M. & Vatanpour, V. & Rahimi, Z., 2017. "High power generation and COD removal in a microbial fuel cell operated by a novel sulfonated PES/PES blend proton exchange membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 427-438.
    5. Ghasemi, Mostafa & Wan Daud, Wan Ramli & Alam, Javed & Ilbeygi, Hamid & Sedighi, Mehdi & Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi & Yazdi, Mohammad H. & Aljlil, Saad A., 2016. "Treatment of two different water resources in desalination and microbial fuel cell processes by poly sulfone/Sulfonated poly ether ether ketone hybrid membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 303-313.
    6. Leong, Jun Xing & Daud, Wan Ramli Wan & Ghasemi, Mostafa & Liew, Kien Ben & Ismail, Manal, 2013. "Ion exchange membranes as separators in microbial fuel cells for bioenergy conversion: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 575-587.
    7. Pereira, Luis Santos & Oweis, Theib & Zairi, Abdelaziz, 2002. "Irrigation management under water scarcity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 175-206, December.
    8. Garg, A. & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2017. "Design of explicit models for estimating efficiency characteristics of microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 136-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue, Xirong & Ji, Xu & Xu, Haiyang & Yang, Bianfeng & Wang, Mengqi & Yang, Yuan, 2023. "Performance investigation on GO-TiO2/PVDF composite ultrafiltration membrane for slightly polluted ground water treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    2. Shahid, Kanwal & Ramasamy, Deepika Lakshmi & Haapasaari, Sampo & Sillanpää, Mika & Pihlajamäki, Arto, 2021. "Stainless steel and carbon brushes as high-performance anodes for energy production and nutrient recovery using the microbial nutrient recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Chen, Bor-Yann & Liao, Jia-Hui & Hsueh, Chung-Chuan & Qu, Ziwei & Hsu, An-Wei & Chang, Chang-Tang & Zhang, Shuping, 2018. "Deciphering biostimulation strategy of using medicinal herbs and tea extracts for bioelectricity generation in microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1042-1054.
    4. Gao, Ningshengjie & Qu, Botong & Xing, Zhenyu & Ji, Xiulei & Zhang, Eugene & Liu, Hong, 2018. "Development of novel polyethylene air-cathode material for microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 763-771.
    5. Kondaveeti, Sanath & Patel, Sanjay K.S. & Pagolu, Raviteja & Li, Jinglin & Kalia, Vipin C. & Choi, Myung-Seok & Lee, Jung-Kul, 2019. "Conversion of simulated biogas to electricity: Sequential operation of methanotrophic reactor effluents in microbial fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ortiz-Martínez, V.M. & Salar-García, M.J. & Touati, K. & Hernández-Fernández, F.J. & de los Ríos, A.P. & Belhoucine, F. & Berrabbah, A. Alioua, 2016. "Assessment of spinel-type mixed valence Cu/Co and Ni/Co-based oxides for power production in single-chamber microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1241-1249.
    2. Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Gashoul, Fatemeh, 2017. "Comprehensive investigation of physicochemical and electrochemical properties of sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) membranes with different degrees of sulfonation for proton exchange membrane fuel ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 614-628.
    3. Shabani, Mehri & Younesi, Habibollah & Pontié, Maxime & Rahimpour, Ahmad & Rahimnejad, Mostafa & Guo, Hanxiao & Szymczyk, Anthony, 2021. "Enhancement of microbial fuel cell efficiency by incorporation of graphene oxide and functionalized graphene oxide in sulfonated polyethersulfone membrane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 788-801.
    4. Sugumar, Moogambigai & Dharmalingam, Sangeetha, 2022. "Statistical assessment of operational parameters using optimized sulphonated titanium nanotubes incorporated sulphonated polystyrene ethylene butylene polystyrene nanocomposite membrane for efficient ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Sekar, Aiswarya Devi & Jayabalan, Tamilmani & Muthukumar, Harshiny & Chandrasekaran, Nivedhini Iswarya & Mohamed, Samsudeen Naina & Matheswaran, Manickam, 2019. "Enhancing power generation and treatment of dairy waste water in microbial fuel cell using Cu-doped iron oxide nanoparticles decorated anode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 173-180.
    6. Wang, Yuyang & Chen, Ye & Wen, Qing & Zheng, Hongtao & Xu, Haitao & Qi, Lijuan, 2019. "Electricity generation, energy storage, and microbial-community analysis in microbial fuel cells with multilayer capacitive anodes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Chen, Bor-Yann & Liao, Jia-Hui & Hsueh, Chung-Chuan & Qu, Ziwei & Hsu, An-Wei & Chang, Chang-Tang & Zhang, Shuping, 2018. "Deciphering biostimulation strategy of using medicinal herbs and tea extracts for bioelectricity generation in microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1042-1054.
    8. Garg, N.K. & Dadhich, Sushmita M., 2014. "Integrated non-linear model for optimal cropping pattern and irrigation scheduling under deficit irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
    9. Darouich, Hanaa & Karfoul, Razan & Ramos, Tiago B. & Moustafa, Ali & Shaheen, Baraa & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Crop water requirements and crop coefficients for jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) using the SIMDualKc model and assessing irrigation strategies for the Syrian Akkar region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    10. Giorgio Baiamonte & Mario Minacapilli & Giuseppina Crescimanno, 2020. "Effects of Biochar on Irrigation Management and Water Use Efficiency for Three Different Crops in a Desert Sandy Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Zhang, Dongmei & Guo, Ping, 2016. "Integrated agriculture water management optimization model for water saving potential analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 5-19.
    12. Geerts, S. & Raes, D. & Garcia, M., 2010. "Using AquaCrop to derive deficit irrigation schedules," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 213-216, December.
    13. Trevor W. Crosby & Yi Wang, 2021. "Effects of Different Irrigation Management Practices on Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Venot, Jean-Philippe & Reddy, V. Ratna & Umapathy, Deeptha, 2010. "Coping with drought in irrigated South India: Farmers' adjustments in Nagarjuna Sagar," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1434-1442, October.
    15. Ćosić, Marija & Djurović, Nevenka & Todorović, Mladen & Maletić, Radojka & Zečević, Bogoljub & Stričević, Ružica, 2015. "Effect of irrigation regime and application of kaolin on yield, quality and water use efficiency of sweet pepper," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 139-147.
    16. Salvatore Barbagallo & Simona Consoli & Nello Pappalardo & Salvatore Greco & Santo Zimbone, 2006. "Discovering Reservoir Operating Rules by a Rough Set Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(1), pages 19-36, February.
    17. Mojeed Opeyemi Oyedeji & Abdullah Alharbi & Mujahed Aldhaifallah & Hegazy Rezk, 2023. "Optimal Data-Driven Modelling of a Microbial Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Eric Njuki & Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, 2019. "Examining irrigation productivity in U.S. agriculture using a single-factor approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 125-136, June.
    19. Deng, Xinan & Luo, Yuzhou & Dong, Suocheng & Yang, Xiusheng, 2005. "Impact of resources and technology on farm production in northwestern China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 155-169, May.
    20. Zhang, Tibin & Zou, Yufeng & Kisekka, Isaya & Biswas, Asim & Cai, Huanjie, 2021. "Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize’s yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:141:y:2017:i:c:p:1350-1362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.