IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v141y2017icp1350-1362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy recovery and hygienic water production from wastewater using an innovative integrated microbial fuel cell–membrane separation process

Author

Listed:
  • Zinadini, S.
  • Zinatizadeh, A.A.
  • Rahimi, M.
  • Vatanpour, V.
  • Bahrami, K.

Abstract

In this study, wastewater treatment was destined for generation of electricity and hygienic water by an innovative integrated microbial fuel cell – membrane separation process (MFC-MSP). An optimal antifouling nanofiltration membrane (blended with O-carboxymethyl chitosan bound Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (CCFe3O4 NPs)), an antifouling ultrafiltration (UF) membrane (blended with polycitrate-alumoxane nanoparticle (PC-A)) and a high efficiency proton exchange membranes were applied in MSP and MFC processes. Firstly, the performance of MFC unit under different operating conditions of reaction time (RT), mixed liquor suspended solid (MLSS) concentration and influent chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration was investigated in terms of COD removal efficiency and power generation for synthetic dairy wastewater treatment. The experiments were modeled using response surface methodology (RSM). The results indicated that by increasing in RT and CODin concentration, the COD removal was decreased. Also, the high concentration of MLSS in anodic chamber led to high COD removal efficiency. By increasing of MLSS beyond 3000 mg/L, the maximum power generation was decreased that reveals an adverse impact of biofouling on membrane performance. After primary treatment in anodic chamber of MFC at optimum condition, the anodic chamber effluent was passed through the membranes in two modes, direct nanofiltration (NF) membrane and UF-NF membranes in series. The results indicated that the UF membrane alleviated the organic loading of NF membrane by 72% relative to the direct NF filtration. The permeation flux shows a sustain performance of the NF when is coupled with UF membrane.a.

Suggested Citation

  • Zinadini, S. & Zinatizadeh, A.A. & Rahimi, M. & Vatanpour, V. & Bahrami, K., 2017. "Energy recovery and hygienic water production from wastewater using an innovative integrated microbial fuel cell–membrane separation process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1350-1362.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:141:y:2017:i:c:p:1350-1362
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217319060
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayyaru, Sivasankaran & Dharmalingam, Sangeetha, 2015. "A study of influence on nanocomposite membrane of sulfonated TiO2 and sulfonated polystyrene-ethylene-butylene-polystyrene for microbial fuel cell application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 202-208.
    2. Chen, Yingwen & Chen, Liuliu & Li, Peiwen & Xu, Yuan & Fan, Mengjie & Zhu, Shemin & Shen, Shubao, 2016. "Enhanced performance of microbial fuel cells by using MnO2/Halloysite nanotubes to modify carbon cloth anodes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 620-628.
    3. Leong, Jun Xing & Daud, Wan Ramli Wan & Ghasemi, Mostafa & Liew, Kien Ben & Ismail, Manal, 2013. "Ion exchange membranes as separators in microbial fuel cells for bioenergy conversion: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 575-587.
    4. Zinadini, S. & Zinatizadeh, A.A. & Rahimi, M. & Vatanpour, V. & Rahimi, Z., 2017. "High power generation and COD removal in a microbial fuel cell operated by a novel sulfonated PES/PES blend proton exchange membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 427-438.
    5. Pereira, Luis Santos & Oweis, Theib & Zairi, Abdelaziz, 2002. "Irrigation management under water scarcity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 175-206, December.
    6. Garg, A. & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2017. "Design of explicit models for estimating efficiency characteristics of microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 136-156.
    7. Schilirò, T. & Tommasi, T. & Armato, C. & Hidalgo, D. & Traversi, D. & Bocchini, S. & Gilli, G. & Pirri, C.F., 2016. "The study of electrochemically active planktonic microbes in microbial fuel cells in relation to different carbon-based anode materials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 277-284.
    8. Ghasemi, Mostafa & Wan Daud, Wan Ramli & Alam, Javed & Ilbeygi, Hamid & Sedighi, Mehdi & Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi & Yazdi, Mohammad H. & Aljlil, Saad A., 2016. "Treatment of two different water resources in desalination and microbial fuel cell processes by poly sulfone/Sulfonated poly ether ether ketone hybrid membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 303-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue, Xirong & Ji, Xu & Xu, Haiyang & Yang, Bianfeng & Wang, Mengqi & Yang, Yuan, 2023. "Performance investigation on GO-TiO2/PVDF composite ultrafiltration membrane for slightly polluted ground water treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    2. Shahid, Kanwal & Ramasamy, Deepika Lakshmi & Haapasaari, Sampo & Sillanpää, Mika & Pihlajamäki, Arto, 2021. "Stainless steel and carbon brushes as high-performance anodes for energy production and nutrient recovery using the microbial nutrient recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Chen, Bor-Yann & Liao, Jia-Hui & Hsueh, Chung-Chuan & Qu, Ziwei & Hsu, An-Wei & Chang, Chang-Tang & Zhang, Shuping, 2018. "Deciphering biostimulation strategy of using medicinal herbs and tea extracts for bioelectricity generation in microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1042-1054.
    4. Gao, Ningshengjie & Qu, Botong & Xing, Zhenyu & Ji, Xiulei & Zhang, Eugene & Liu, Hong, 2018. "Development of novel polyethylene air-cathode material for microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 763-771.
    5. Kondaveeti, Sanath & Patel, Sanjay K.S. & Pagolu, Raviteja & Li, Jinglin & Kalia, Vipin C. & Choi, Myung-Seok & Lee, Jung-Kul, 2019. "Conversion of simulated biogas to electricity: Sequential operation of methanotrophic reactor effluents in microbial fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ortiz-Martínez, V.M. & Salar-García, M.J. & Touati, K. & Hernández-Fernández, F.J. & de los Ríos, A.P. & Belhoucine, F. & Berrabbah, A. Alioua, 2016. "Assessment of spinel-type mixed valence Cu/Co and Ni/Co-based oxides for power production in single-chamber microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1241-1249.
    2. Parnian, Mohammad Javad & Rowshanzamir, Soosan & Gashoul, Fatemeh, 2017. "Comprehensive investigation of physicochemical and electrochemical properties of sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) membranes with different degrees of sulfonation for proton exchange membrane fuel ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 614-628.
    3. Sekar, Aiswarya Devi & Jayabalan, Tamilmani & Muthukumar, Harshiny & Chandrasekaran, Nivedhini Iswarya & Mohamed, Samsudeen Naina & Matheswaran, Manickam, 2019. "Enhancing power generation and treatment of dairy waste water in microbial fuel cell using Cu-doped iron oxide nanoparticles decorated anode," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 173-180.
    4. Wang, Yuyang & Chen, Ye & Wen, Qing & Zheng, Hongtao & Xu, Haitao & Qi, Lijuan, 2019. "Electricity generation, energy storage, and microbial-community analysis in microbial fuel cells with multilayer capacitive anodes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Chen, Bor-Yann & Liao, Jia-Hui & Hsueh, Chung-Chuan & Qu, Ziwei & Hsu, An-Wei & Chang, Chang-Tang & Zhang, Shuping, 2018. "Deciphering biostimulation strategy of using medicinal herbs and tea extracts for bioelectricity generation in microbial fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1042-1054.
    6. Shabani, Mehri & Younesi, Habibollah & Pontié, Maxime & Rahimpour, Ahmad & Rahimnejad, Mostafa & Guo, Hanxiao & Szymczyk, Anthony, 2021. "Enhancement of microbial fuel cell efficiency by incorporation of graphene oxide and functionalized graphene oxide in sulfonated polyethersulfone membrane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 788-801.
    7. Sugumar, Moogambigai & Dharmalingam, Sangeetha, 2022. "Statistical assessment of operational parameters using optimized sulphonated titanium nanotubes incorporated sulphonated polystyrene ethylene butylene polystyrene nanocomposite membrane for efficient ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Andarzian, B. & Bannayan, M. & Steduto, P. & Mazraeh, H. & Barati, M.E. & Barati, M.A. & Rahnama, A., 2011. "Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 1-8.
    9. Heidarpour, M. & Mostafazadeh-Fard, B. & Abedi Koupai, J. & Malekian, R., 2007. "The effects of treated wastewater on soil chemical properties using subsurface and surface irrigation methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-2), pages 87-94, May.
    10. Garg, N.K. & Dadhich, Sushmita M., 2014. "Integrated non-linear model for optimal cropping pattern and irrigation scheduling under deficit irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
    11. Patanè, C. & Cosentino, S.L., 2010. "Effects of soil water deficit on yield and quality of processing tomato under a Mediterranean climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 131-138, January.
    12. Darouich, Hanaa & Karfoul, Razan & Ramos, Tiago B. & Moustafa, Ali & Shaheen, Baraa & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Crop water requirements and crop coefficients for jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) using the SIMDualKc model and assessing irrigation strategies for the Syrian Akkar region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    13. Abd El-Wahed, M.H. & Ali, E.A., 2013. "Effect of irrigation systems, amounts of irrigation water and mulching on corn yield, water use efficiency and net profit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 64-71.
    14. Pedras, C.M.G. & Pereira, L.S. & Gonalves, J.M., 2009. "MIRRIG: A decision support system for design and evaluation of microirrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 691-701, April.
    15. Giorgio Baiamonte & Mario Minacapilli & Giuseppina Crescimanno, 2020. "Effects of Biochar on Irrigation Management and Water Use Efficiency for Three Different Crops in a Desert Sandy Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    17. Sandhu, O.S. & Gupta, R.K. & Thind, H.S. & Jat, M.L. & Sidhu, H.S. & Yadvinder-Singh,, 2019. "Drip irrigation and nitrogen management for improving crop yields, nitrogen use efficiency and water productivity of maize-wheat system on permanent beds in north-west India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 19-26.
    18. Cunha, Angélica Carvalho & Filho, Luís Roberto Almeida Gabriel & Tanaka, Adriana Aki & Goes, Bruno Cesar & Putti, Fernando Ferrari, 2021. "Influence Of The Estimated Global Solar Radiation On The Reference Evapotranspiration Obtained Through The Penman-Monteith Fao 56 Method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    19. Zhang, Dongmei & Guo, Ping, 2016. "Integrated agriculture water management optimization model for water saving potential analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 5-19.
    20. Calzadilla, Alvaro & Rehdanz, Katrin & Tol, Richard S.J., 2008. "Water scarcity and the impact of improved irrigation management: A CGE analysis," Conference papers 331788, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:141:y:2017:i:c:p:1350-1362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.