IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v109y2016icp920-932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inexact stochastic risk-aversion optimal day-ahead dispatch model for electricity system management with wind power under uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Ji, Ling
  • Huang, Guo-He
  • Huang, Lu-Cheng
  • Xie, Yu-Lei
  • Niu, Dong-Xiao

Abstract

High penetration of wind power generation and deregulated electricity market brings a great challenge to the electricity system operators. It is crucial to make optimal strategy among various generation units and spinning reserve for supporting the system safety operation. By integrating interval two-stage programming and stochastic robust programming, this paper proposes a novel robust model for day-ahead dispatch and risk-aversion management under uncertainties. In the proposed model, the uncertainties are expressed as interval values with different scenario probability. The proposed method requires low computation, and still retains the complete information. A case study is to validate the effectiveness of this approach. Facing the uncertainties of future demand and electricity price, the system operators need to make optimal dispatch strategy for thermal power units and wind turbine, and arrange proper spinning reserve and flexible demand response program to mitigate wind power forecasting error. The optimal strategies provide the system operators with better trade-off between the maximum benefits and the minimum system risk. In additional, two different market rules are compared. The results show that extra financial penalty for the wind power dispatch deviation is another efficient way to enhance the risk consciousness of decision makers and lead to more conservative strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ji, Ling & Huang, Guo-He & Huang, Lu-Cheng & Xie, Yu-Lei & Niu, Dong-Xiao, 2016. "Inexact stochastic risk-aversion optimal day-ahead dispatch model for electricity system management with wind power under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 920-932.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:920-932
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216305709
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maqsood, Imran & Huang, Guo H. & Scott Yeomans, Julian, 2005. "An interval-parameter fuzzy two-stage stochastic program for water resources management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 208-225, November.
    2. Yelin Fu & Kin Keung Lai & Liang Liang, 2016. "A robust optimisation approach to the problem of supplier selection and allocation in outsourcing," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 913-918, March.
    3. Xie, Y.L. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.F., 2010. "An interval fixed-mix stochastic programming method for greenhouse gas mitigation in energy systems under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4627-4644.
    4. Yu, Chian-Son & Li, Han-Lin, 2000. "A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 385-397, March.
    5. Ji, L. & Niu, D.X. & Huang, G.H., 2014. "An inexact two-stage stochastic robust programming for residential micro-grid management-based on random demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 186-199.
    6. Vilim, Michael & Botterud, Audun, 2014. "Wind power bidding in electricity markets with high wind penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 141-155.
    7. Liu, Yangyang & Jiang, Chuanwen & Shen, Jingshuang & Hu, Jiakai & Luo, Yifan, 2015. "Coordination of hydro units with wind power generation based on RAROC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 783-792.
    8. John M. Mulvey & Robert J. Vanderbei & Stavros A. Zenios, 1995. "Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 264-281, April.
    9. Falsafi, Hananeh & Zakariazadeh, Alireza & Jadid, Shahram, 2014. "The role of demand response in single and multi-objective wind-thermal generation scheduling: A stochastic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 853-867.
    10. Birge, John R. & Louveaux, Francois V., 1988. "A multicut algorithm for two-stage stochastic linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 384-392, March.
    11. Taghavi, Reza & Seifi, Ali Reza & Samet, Haidar, 2015. "Stochastic reactive power dispatch in hybrid power system with intermittent wind power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 511-518.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Xiaoyue & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Li, Kailong, 2022. "Development of a stochastic multistage lifecycle programming model for electric power system planning – A case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Dianzheng Fu & Tianji Yang & Yize Huang & Yiming Tong, 2022. "Integrated Optimization for Biofuel Management Associated with a Biomass-Penetrated Heating System under Multiple and Compound Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Xu, Fangyuan & Zhu, Weidong & Wang, Yi Fei & Lai, Chun Sing & Yuan, Haoliang & Zhao, Yujia & Guo, Siming & Fu, Zhengxin, 2022. "A new deregulated demand response scheme for load over-shifting city in regulated power market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    4. Chen, J.J. & Zhao, Y.L. & Peng, K. & Wu, P.Z., 2017. "Optimal trade-off planning for wind-solar power day-ahead scheduling under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1969-1981.
    5. Lin, Zhenjia & Chen, Haoyong & Wu, Qiuwei & Li, Weiwei & Li, Mengshi & Ji, Tianyao, 2020. "Mean-tracking model based stochastic economic dispatch for power systems with high penetration of wind power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Golpîra, Hêriş, 2020. "Smart Energy-Aware Manufacturing Plant Scheduling under Uncertainty: A Risk-Based Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Zheng, Lingwei & Zhou, Xingqiu & Qiu, Qi & Yang, Lan, 2020. "Day-ahead optimal dispatch of an integrated energy system considering time-frequency characteristics of renewable energy source output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Roy, Sanjoy, 2018. "The maximum likelihood optima for an economic load dispatch in presence of demand and generation variability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 915-923.
    9. Xie, Y.L. & Xia, D.H. & Ji, L. & Zhou, W.N. & Huang, G.H., 2017. "An inexact cost-risk balanced model for regional energy structure adjustment management and resources environmental effect analysis-a case study of Shandong province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 374-391.
    10. Ji, Ling & Huang, Guohe & Xie, Yulei & Zhou, Yong & Zhou, Jifang, 2018. "Robust cost-risk tradeoff for day-ahead schedule optimization in residential microgrid system under worst-case conditional value-at-risk consideration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 324-337.
    11. Yulei Xie & Zhenghui Fu & Dehong Xia & Wentao Lu & Guohe Huang & Han Wang, 2019. "Integrated Planning for Regional Electric Power System Management with Risk Measure and Carbon Emission Constraints: A Case Study of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Nikolakakis, Thomas & Chattopadhyay, Deb & Bazilian, Morgan, 2017. "A review of renewable investment and power system operational issues in Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 650-658.
    13. Ceyhun Yıldız & Mustafa Tekin & Ahmet Gani & Ö. Fatih Keçecioğlu & Hakan Açıkgöz & Mustafa Şekkeli, 2017. "A Day-Ahead Wind Power Scenario Generation, Reduction, and Quality Test Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji, L. & Niu, D.X. & Huang, G.H., 2014. "An inexact two-stage stochastic robust programming for residential micro-grid management-based on random demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 186-199.
    2. Xie, Y.L. & Huang, G.H. & Li, W. & Ji, L., 2014. "Carbon and air pollutants constrained energy planning for clean power generation with a robust optimization model—A case study of Jining City, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 150-167.
    3. Zarrinpoor, Naeme & Fallahnezhad, Mohammad Saber & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2018. "The design of a reliable and robust hierarchical health service network using an accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1013-1032.
    4. Sarmadi, Kamran & Amiri-Aref, Mehdi & Dong, Jing-Xin & Hicks, Christian, 2020. "Integrated strategic and operational planning of dry port container networks in a stochastic environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 132-164.
    5. Tsai, Jung-Fa, 2007. "An optimization approach for supply chain management models with quantity discount policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 982-994, March.
    6. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    7. Yulei Xie & Linrui Wang & Guohe Huang & Dehong Xia & Ling Ji, 2018. "A Stochastic Inexact Robust Model for Regional Energy System Management and Emission Reduction Potential Analysis—A Case Study of Zibo City, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Golpîra, Hêriş & Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman, 2019. "A multi-objective risk-based robust optimization approach to energy management in smart residential buildings under combined demand and supply uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1113-1129.
    9. Erfan Hassannayebi & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi & Mohammad Reza Amin-Naseri & Masoud Yaghini, 2017. "Train timetabling at rapid rail transit lines: a robust multi-objective stochastic programming approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 435-477, July.
    10. Wang, S. & Huang, G.H., 2015. "A multi-level Taguchi-factorial two-stage stochastic programming approach for characterization of parameter uncertainties and their interactions: An application to water resources management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 572-581.
    11. Xu, Y. & Huang, G.H. & Qin, X.S. & Cao, M.F., 2009. "SRCCP: A stochastic robust chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 352-363.
    12. Azaron, A. & Brown, K.N. & Tarim, S.A. & Modarres, M., 2008. "A multi-objective stochastic programming approach for supply chain design considering risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 129-138, November.
    13. Aalaei, Amin & Davoudpour, Hamid, 2017. "A robust optimization model for cellular manufacturing system into supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 667-679.
    14. Masoud Hekmatfar & M. R. M. Aliha & Mir Saman Pishvaee & Tomasz Sadowski, 2023. "A Robust Flexible Optimization Model for 3D-Layout of Interior Equipment in a Multi-Floor Satellite," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-41, December.
    15. Javid Jouzdani & Mohammad Fathian & Ahmad Makui & Mehdi Heydari, 2020. "Robust design and planning for a multi-mode multi-product supply network: a dairy industry case study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1811-1840, September.
    16. Ratanakuakangwan, Sudlop & Morita, Hiroshi, 2021. "Hybrid stochastic robust optimization and robust optimization for energy planning – A social impact-constrained case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    17. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Dynamic supply chain network design for the supply of blood in disasters: A robust model with real world application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 225-244.
    18. Yan, Shangyao & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2009. "Inter-city bus scheduling under variable market share and uncertain market demands," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 178-192, February.
    19. Bairamzadeh, Samira & Saidi-Mehrabad, Mohammad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2018. "Modelling different types of uncertainty in biofuel supply network design and planning: A robust optimization approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 500-517.
    20. Zahra Homayouni & Mir Saman Pishvaee & Hamed Jahani & Dmitry Ivanov, 2023. "A robust-heuristic optimization approach to a green supply chain design with consideration of assorted vehicle types and carbon policies under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 395-435, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:920-932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.