IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v196y2025ics0301421524003999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who should pay for frequency-containment ancillary services? Making responsible units bear the cost to shape investment in generation and loads

Author

Listed:
  • Badesa, Luis
  • Matamala, Carlos
  • Strbac, Goran

Abstract

While the operating cost of electricity grids based on thermal generation was largely driven by the cost of fuel, as renewable penetration increases, ancillary services represent an increasingly large proportion of the running costs. Electric frequency is an important magnitude in highly renewable grids, as it becomes more volatile and therefore the cost related to maintaining it within safe bounds has significantly increased. So far, costs for frequency-containment ancillary services have been socialised in most countries, but it has become relevant to rethink this regulatory arrangement. In this paper, we discuss the issue of cost allocation for these services, highlighting the need to evolve towards a causation-based regulatory framework. We argue that parties responsible for creating the need for ancillary services should bear these costs. However, this would imply an important change in electricity market policy, therefore it is necessary to understand the impact on current and future investments on generation, as well as on electricity tariffs. Here we provide a mostly qualitative analysis of this issue, defining guidelines for practical implementation and further study.

Suggested Citation

  • Badesa, Luis & Matamala, Carlos & Strbac, Goran, 2025. "Who should pay for frequency-containment ancillary services? Making responsible units bear the cost to shape investment in generation and loads," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524003999
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003999
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114379?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Kristiansen & Francisco D. Muñoz & Shmuel Oren & Magnus Korpås, 2018. "A Mechanism for Allocating Benefits and Costs from Transmission Interconnections under Cooperation: A Case Study of the North Sea Offshore Grid," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(6), pages 209-234, November.
    2. Potters, Jos & Sudholter, Peter, 1999. "Airport problems and consistent allocation rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 83-102, July.
    3. Strbac, Goran & Kirschen, Daniel S., 2000. "Who Should Pay for Reserve?," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 32-37, October.
    4. Bialek, J., 2020. "What does the power outage on 9 August 2019 tell us about GB power system," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2018, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Janusz Bialek, 2020. "What does the power outage on 9 August 2019 tell us about GB power system," Working Papers EPRG2006, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    6. S. C. Littlechild & G. Owen, 1973. "A Simple Expression for the Shapley Value in a Special Case," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 370-372, November.
    7. Bialek, Janusz, 2020. "What does the GB power outage on 9 August 2019 tell us about the current state of decarbonised power systems?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Badesa, Luis & Strbac, Goran & Magill, Matt & Stojkovska, Biljana, 2021. "Ancillary services in Great Britain during the COVID-19 lockdown: A glimpse of the carbon-free future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    9. Prakash, Abhijith & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2022. "Insights on designing effective and efficient frequency control arrangements from the Australian National Electricity Market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Chenxi & Zhang, Jun & Yuan, Hongxia & Gao, Tianlu & Jiang, Huaiguang & Yan, Jing & Wenzhong Gao, David & Wang, Fei-Yue, 2022. "Black swan event small-sample transfer learning (BEST-L) and its case study on electrical power prediction in COVID-19," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    2. Harri Aaltonen & Seppo Sierla & Rakshith Subramanya & Valeriy Vyatkin, 2021. "A Simulation Environment for Training a Reinforcement Learning Agent Trading a Battery Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Ziqian Zhang & Carina Lehmal & Philipp Hackl & Robert Schuerhuber, 2022. "Transient Stability Analysis and Post-Fault Restart Strategy for Current-Limited Grid-Forming Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Paula Jaramillo, 2013. "Congestion in irrigation problems," Documentos CEDE 10553, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    5. Yokote, Koji & Funaki, Yukihiko & Kamijo, Yoshio, 2017. "Coincidence of the Shapley value with other solutions satisfying covariance," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-9.
    6. R. Brânzei & E. Iñarra & S. Tijs & J. M. Zarzuelo, 2005. "Cooperation by Asymmetric Agents in a Joint Project," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 7(4), pages 623-640, October.
    7. Li, Kun & Wei, Lishen & Fang, Jiakun & Ai, Xiaomeng & Cui, Shichang & Zhu, Mengshu & Wen, Jinyu, 2024. "Incentive-compatible primary frequency response ancillary service market mechanism for incorporating diverse frequency support resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    8. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Tvede, Mich & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2017. "Sharing the proceeds from a hierarchical venture," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 98-110.
    9. J. Arin & E. Inarra & P. Luquin, 2009. "A noncooperative view on two airport cost sharing rules," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 13(4), pages 361-376, December.
    10. Brânzei, R. & Inarra, E. & Tijs, S.H. & Zarzuelo, J., 2003. "An Algorithm for the Nucleolus of Airport Profit Problems," Discussion Paper 2003-50, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    11. Miguel Ángel Mirás Calvo & Carmen Quinteiro Sandomingo & Estela Sánchez Rodríguez, 2016. "Monotonicity implications for the ranking of rules for airport problems," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 12(4), pages 379-400, December.
    12. Hu, Cheng-Cheng & Tsay, Min-Hung & Yeh, Chun-Hsien, 2018. "A study of the nucleolus in the nested cost-sharing problem: Axiomatic and strategic perspectives," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 82-98.
    13. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Tvede, Mich & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2013. "Cost Sharing in Chains and Other Fixed Trees," Discussion Papers on Economics 12/2013, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    14. Bialek, Janusz, 2020. "What does the GB power outage on 9 August 2019 tell us about the current state of decarbonised power systems?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Yan-An Hwang & Chun-Hsien Yeh, 2012. "A characterization of the nucleolus without homogeneity in airport problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(2), pages 355-364, February.
    16. Jens Leth Hougaard & Mich Tvede, 2011. "Incremental Cost Sharing in Chains and Fixed Trees," MSAP Working Paper Series 02_2011, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    17. Dehez, Pierre, 2023. "Sharing a collective probability of success," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 122-127.
    18. Takayuki Oishi, 2019. "A General Derivation of Axiomatizations for Allocation Rules: Duality and Anti-Duality Approach," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2019-011, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    19. repec:ehu:ikerla:6372 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Stelios C. Dimoulias & Eleftherios O. Kontis & Grigoris K. Papagiannis, 2022. "Inertia Estimation of Synchronous Devices: Review of Available Techniques and Comparative Assessment of Conventional Measurement-Based Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-30, October.
    21. M. Albizuri & J. Echarri & J. Zarzuelo, 2015. "A non-cooperative mechanism for the Shapley value of airport problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:196:y:2025:i:c:s0301421524003999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.