IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v182y2023ics0301421523003245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which factor contributes more to the fuel consumption gap between in-laboratory vs. real-world driving conditions? An independent component analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Pengfei
  • Yin, Hang
  • Lu, Hongyu
  • Wu, Yizheng
  • Zhai, Zhiqiang
  • Yu, Lei
  • Song, Guohua

Abstract

A widening vehicle fuel consumption gap has been found between in-laboratory and real-world driving conditions, which can undermine policy-making concerning energy saving and greenhouse gas reduction. Various factors have been identified as contributors to the gap; however, their contributions have not been independently assessed, which hinders the gap's narrowing. This study confirmed an average gap of 42% based on 0.95 billion records of second-by-second vehicle operating (speed, acceleration, etc.) and fuel consumption data collected from 395 light-duty vehicles through On-board Diagnostics (OBD) devices in Beijing. Contributions of fuel consumption rate (FCR)-related, engine load-related, and road grade discrepancies between the in-laboratory test procedure vs. real-world driving conditions to the gap were independently assessed. Results indicated that the FCR-related, engine load-related, and road grade discrepancies contributed 20.7%, 17.0%, and 3.2% to the gap, respectively (only 1.0% of the gap has not been explained). Replacing the test cycle from the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) with the China Light-duty vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC-P) has the potential to reduce the engine load-related gap from 17.0% to 6.9% in Beijing. Policies should focus on developing more local test procedures or recording real-world fuel consumption through onboard devices to evaluate vehicle economy with higher reality representation.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Pengfei & Yin, Hang & Lu, Hongyu & Wu, Yizheng & Zhai, Zhiqiang & Yu, Lei & Song, Guohua, 2023. "Which factor contributes more to the fuel consumption gap between in-laboratory vs. real-world driving conditions? An independent component analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:182:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003245
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523003245
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evangelos G. Giakoumis & Alexandros T. Zachiotis, 2017. "Investigation of a Diesel-Engined Vehicle’s Performance and Emissions during the WLTC Driving Cycle—Comparison with the NEDC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Zhang, Shaojun & Wu, Ye & Liu, Huan & Huang, Ruikun & Un, Puikei & Zhou, Yu & Fu, Lixin & Hao, Jiming, 2014. "Real-world fuel consumption and CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions by driving conditions for light-duty passenger vehicles in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 247-257.
    3. Huo, Hong & Yao, Zhiliang & He, Kebin & Yu, Xin, 2011. "Fuel consumption rates of passenger cars in China: Labels versus real-world," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7130-7135.
    4. Pavlovic, J. & Ciuffo, B. & Fontaras, G. & Valverde, V. & Marotta, A., 2018. "How much difference in type-approval CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe can be expected from changing to the new test procedure (NEDC vs. WLTP)?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 136-147.
    5. Ntziachristos, L. & Mellios, G. & Tsokolis, D. & Keller, M. & Hausberger, S. & Ligterink, N.E. & Dilara, P., 2014. "In-use vs. type-approval fuel consumption of current passenger cars in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 403-411.
    6. Ben Dror, Maya & Qin, Lanzhi & An, Feng, 2019. "The gap between certified and real-world passenger vehicle fuel consumption in China measured using a mobile phone application data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 8-16.
    7. Yu, Rujie & Ren, Huanhuan & Liu, Yong & Yu, Biying, 2021. "Gap between on-road and official fuel efficiency of passenger vehicles in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Pavlovic, Jelica & Marotta, Alessandro & Ciuffo, Biagio, 2016. "CO2 emissions and energy demands of vehicles tested under the NEDC and the new WLTP type approval test procedures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 661-670.
    9. Rosero, Fredy & Fonseca, Natalia & López, José-María & Casanova, Jesús, 2021. "Effects of passenger load, road grade, and congestion level on real-world fuel consumption and emissions from compressed natural gas and diesel urban buses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    10. Wu, Tian & Han, Xiao & Zheng, M. Mocarlo & Ou, Xunmin & Sun, Hongbo & Zhang, Xiong, 2020. "Impact factors of the real-world fuel consumption rate of light duty vehicles in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Wang, An & Tu, Ran & Xu, Junshi & Zhai, Zhiqiang & Hatzopoulou, Marianne, 2022. "A novel modal emission modelling approach and its application with on-road emission measurements," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    12. Tietge, Uwe & Mock, Peter & Franco, Vicente & Zacharof, Nikiforos, 2017. "From laboratory to road: Modeling the divergence between official and real-world fuel consumption and CO2 emission values in the German passenger car market for the years 2001–2014," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 212-222.
    13. Costagliola, Maria Antonietta & Costabile, Marianeve & Prati, Maria Vittoria, 2018. "Impact of road grade on real driving emissions from two Euro 5 diesel vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 586-593.
    14. Greene, David L. & Khattak, Asad J. & Liu, Jun & Wang, Xin & Hopson, Janet L. & Goeltz, Richard, 2017. "What is the evidence concerning the gap between on-road and Environmental Protection Agency fuel economy ratings?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 146-160.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Rujie & Ren, Huanhuan & Liu, Yong & Yu, Biying, 2021. "Gap between on-road and official fuel efficiency of passenger vehicles in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Tsiakmakis, Stefanos & Fontaras, Georgios & Dornoff, Jan & Valverde, Victor & Komnos, Dimitrios & Ciuffo, Biagio & Mock, Peter & Samaras, Zissis, 2019. "From lab-to-road & vice-versa: Using a simulation-based approach for predicting real-world CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1153-1165.
    3. Cui, Yuepeng & Zou, Fumin & Xu, Hao & Chen, Zhihui & Gong, Kuangmin, 2022. "A novel optimization-based method to develop representative driving cycle in various driving conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Küng, Lukas & Bütler, Thomas & Georges, Gil & Boulouchos, Konstantinos, 2019. "How much energy does a car need on the road?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    5. Aderiana Mutheu Mbandi & Jan R. Böhnke & Dietrich Schwela & Harry Vallack & Mike R. Ashmore & Lisa Emberson, 2019. "Estimating On-Road Vehicle Fuel Economy in Africa: A Case Study Based on an Urban Transport Survey in Nairobi, Kenya," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Triantafyllopoulos, Georgios & Kontses, Anastasios & Tsokolis, Dimitrios & Ntziachristos, Leonidas & Samaras, Zissis, 2017. "Potential of energy efficiency technologies in reducing vehicle consumption under type approval and real world conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 365-373.
    7. Yushan Yang & Nuoya Gong & Keying Xie & Qingfei Liu, 2022. "Predicting Gasoline Vehicle Fuel Consumption in Energy and Environmental Impact Based on Machine Learning and Multidimensional Big Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Cui, Yuepeng & Xu, Hao & Zou, Fumin & Chen, Zhihui & Gong, Kuangmin, 2021. "Optimization based method to develop representative driving cycle for real-world fuel consumption estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Mogno, Caterina & Fontaras, Georgios & Arcidiacono, Vincenzo & Komnos, Dimitrios & Pavlovic, Jelica & Ciuffo, Biagio & Makridis, Michail & Valverde, Victor, 2022. "The application of the CO2MPAS model for vehicle CO2 emissions estimation over real traffic conditions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 152-159.
    10. Greene, David L. & Khattak, Asad J. & Liu, Jun & Wang, Xin & Hopson, Janet L. & Goeltz, Richard, 2017. "What is the evidence concerning the gap between on-road and Environmental Protection Agency fuel economy ratings?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 146-160.
    11. Karol Tucki & Andrzej Wasiak & Olga Orynycz & Remigiusz Mruk, 2020. "Computer Simulation as a Tool for Managing the Technical Development of Methods for Diagnosing the Technical Condition of a Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Zhang, Shaojun & Wu, Ye & Un, Puikei & Fu, Lixin & Hao, Jiming, 2016. "Modeling real-world fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions with high resolution for light-duty passenger vehicles in a traffic populated city," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 461-471.
    13. Xinglong Liu & Fuquan Zhao & Han Hao & Kangda Chen & Zongwei Liu & Hassan Babiker & Amer Ahmad Amer, 2020. "From NEDC to WLTP: Effect on the Energy Consumption, NEV Credits, and Subsidies Policies of PHEV in the Chinese Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Barouch Giechaskiel & Dimitrios Komnos & Georgios Fontaras, 2021. "Impacts of Extreme Ambient Temperatures and Road Gradient on Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions of a Euro 6d-Temp Gasoline Vehicle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Kangda Chen & Fuquan Zhao & Xinglong Liu & Han Hao & Zongwei Liu, 2021. "Impacts of the New Worldwide Light-Duty Test Procedure on Technology Effectiveness and China’s Passenger Vehicle Fuel Consumption Regulations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Pirjola, Liisa & Kuuluvainen, Heino & Timonen, Hilkka & Saarikoski, Sanna & Teinilä, Kimmo & Salo, Laura & Datta, Arindam & Simonen, Pauli & Karjalainen, Panu & Kulmala, Kari & Rönkkö, Topi, 2019. "Potential of renewable fuel to reduce diesel exhaust particle emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    17. José I. Huertas & Michael Giraldo & Luis F. Quirama & Jenny Díaz, 2018. "Driving Cycles Based on Fuel Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.
    18. Wu, Tian & Han, Xiao & Zheng, M. Mocarlo & Ou, Xunmin & Sun, Hongbo & Zhang, Xiong, 2020. "Impact factors of the real-world fuel consumption rate of light duty vehicles in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    19. Karol Tucki & Remigiusz Mruk & Olga Orynycz & Andrzej Wasiak & Katarzyna Botwińska & Arkadiusz Gola, 2019. "Simulation of the Operation of a Spark Ignition Engine Fueled with Various Biofuels and Its Contribution to Technology Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Piotr Pryciński & Róża Wawryszczuk & Jarosław Korzeb & Piotr Pielecha, 2023. "Indicator Method for Determining the Emissivity of Road Transport Means from the Point of Supplied Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:182:y:2023:i:c:s0301421523003245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.