IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v136y2020ics0301421519306421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impacts of an integrated European adjustment market for electricity under high share of renewables

Author

Listed:
  • Zalzar, Shaghayegh
  • Bompard, Ettore
  • Purvins, Arturs
  • Masera, Marcelo

Abstract

The European Commission has set a target of establishing an integrated Europe-wide electricity market for day-ahead and intraday transactions. However, there are still many open questions on the potential benefits of a Europe-wide intraday market integration and the harmonizing market rules. This paper intends to provide a precise insight into the potential impacts of EU policies regarding integrating electricity markets on market efficiency and on different market players with the aim of supporting policy makers to increase the penetration of renewables in a cost efficient manner. In this paper, we investigate and compare the current option of regional intraday electricity market with the option of an integrated Europe-wide one, with reference to the three European test cases with high renewable penetration: the Iberian electricity market including Spain and Portugal, the Italian electricity market including Italy and Slovenia, and the electricity market of Germany. We consider two 2030 scenarios: (i) the regional/local intraday electricity market, and (ii) the integration of the current regional intraday market of the test cases into a single intraday market in Europe. The two scenarios are modelled through stochastic Monte Carlo simulation, considering uncertainty on electricity demand, wind and solar power. The performance of the intraday market under the two options are compared in terms of generation cost, electricity prices, producer’ surplus, and load expenditure inside the European test cases. The simulation results lead to the conclusion that integrating to a Europe-wide intraday electricity market is not advantageous for power producers inside the European countries with high share of variable renewable generation, in terms of annual generation surplus. However, from the customers’ point of view, intraday market integration is beneficial, leading to lower cost to loads. Furthermore, it is shown that the flexibility provided by the installed capacity of hydro pumped-storage generators within Europe, by 2030, eliminates the planned curtailment of renewable energy sources in day-ahead and intraday markets and confines the impact of market integration on the market performance indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Zalzar, Shaghayegh & Bompard, Ettore & Purvins, Arturs & Masera, Marcelo, 2020. "The impacts of an integrated European adjustment market for electricity under high share of renewables," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519306421
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421519306421
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Newbery, David & Strbac, Goran & Viehoff, Ivan, 2016. "The benefits of integrating European electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 253-263.
    2. Lago, Jesus & De Ridder, Fjo & Vrancx, Peter & De Schutter, Bart, 2018. "Forecasting day-ahead electricity prices in Europe: The importance of considering market integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 890-903.
    3. Ettore Bompard & Shaghayegh Zalzar & Tao Huang & Arturs Purvins & Marcelo Masera, 2018. "Baltic Power Systems’ Integration into the EU Market Coupling under Different Desynchronization Schemes: A Comparative Market Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    4. William W. Hogan, 2013. "Electricity Scarcity Pricing Through Operating Reserves," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    5. Mazza, Andrea & Bompard, Ettore & Chicco, Gianfranco, 2018. "Applications of power to gas technologies in emerging electrical systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 794-806.
    6. Ringler, Philipp & Keles, Dogan & Fichtner, Wolf, 2017. "How to benefit from a common European electricity market design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 629-643.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Macedo, Daniela Pereira & Marques, António Cardoso & Damette, Olivier, 2020. "The impact of the integration of renewable energy sources in the electricity price formation: is the Merit-Order Effect occurring in Portugal?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Dominika Čeryová & Tatiana Bullová & Natália Turčeková & Izabela Adamičková & Danka Moravčíková & Peter Bielik, 2020. "Assessment of the Renewable Energy Sector Performance Using Selected Indicators in European Union Countries," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Negin Entezari & José Alberto Fuinhas, 2024. "Quantifying the Impact of Risk on Market Volatility and Price: Evidence from the Wholesale Electricity Market in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Luca Lena Jansen & Georg Thomaßen & Georgios Antonopoulos & Ľuboš Buzna, 2022. "An Efficient Framework to Estimate the State of Charge Profiles of Hydro Units for Large-Scale Zonal and Nodal Pricing Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Zade, Michel & Lumpp, Sebastian Dirk & Tzscheutschler, Peter & Wagner, Ulrich, 2022. "Satisfying user preferences in community-based local energy markets — Auction-based clearing approaches," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    6. Graça Gomes, João & Jiang, Juan & Chong, Cheng Tung & Telhada, João & Zhang, Xu & Sammarchi, Sergio & Wang, Shuyang & Lin, Yu & Li, Jialong, 2023. "Hybrid solar PV-wind-battery system bidding optimisation: A case study for the Iberian and Italian liberalised electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    7. Badr Eddine Lebrouhi & Eric Schall & Bilal Lamrani & Yassine Chaibi & Tarik Kousksou, 2022. "Energy Transition in France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Maximilian Borning & Larissa Doré & Michael Wolff & Julian Walter & Tristan Becker & Grit Walther & Albert Moser, 2020. "Opportunities and Challenges of Flexible Electricity-Based Fuel Production for the European Power System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-26, November.
    9. Badr Eddine Lebrouhi & Éric Schall & Bilal Lamrani & Yassine Chaibi & Tarik Kousksou, 2022. "Energy Transition in France," Post-Print hal-03716839, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saez, Yago & Mochon, Asuncion & Corona, Luis & Isasi, Pedro, 2019. "Integration in the European electricity market: A machine learning-based convergence analysis for the Central Western Europe region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 549-566.
    2. Zorana Božić & Dušan Dobromirov & Jovana Arsić & Mladen Radišić & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2020. "Power Exchange Prices: Comparison of Volatility in European Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Backer, Martijn & Keles, Dogan & Kraft, Emil, 2023. "The economic impacts of integrating European balancing markets: The case of the newly installed aFRR energy market-coupling platform PICASSO," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Samarth Kumar & David Schönheit & Matthew Schmidt & Dominik Möst, 2019. "Parsing the Effects of Wind and Solar Generation on the German Electricity Trade Surplus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Ioannidis, Filippos & Kosmidou, Kyriaki & Makridou, Georgia & Andriosopoulos, Kostas, 2019. "Market design of an energy exchange: The case of Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Ioannis P. Panapakidis & Nikolaos Koltsaklis & Georgios C. Christoforidis, 2020. "A Novel Integrated Profit Maximization Model for Retailers under Varied Penetration Levels of Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Karhinen, Santtu & Huuki, Hannu, 2020. "How are the long distances between renewable energy sources and load centres reflected in locational marginal prices?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    8. Oprea, Simona-Vasilica & Bâra, Adela & Ciurea, Cristian-Eugen, 2022. "A novel cost-revenue allocation computation for the competitiveness of balancing responsible parties, including RES. Insights from the electricity market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 881-894.
    9. Filippos Ioannidis & Kyriaki Kosmidou & Kostas Andriosopoulos & Antigoni Everkiadi, 2021. "Assessment of the Target Model Implementation in the Wholesale Electricity Market of Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Gea-Bermúdez, Juan & Pade, Lise-Lotte & Koivisto, Matti Juhani & Ravn, Hans, 2020. "Optimal generation and transmission development of the North Sea region: Impact of grid architecture and planning horizon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    11. Di Foggia, Giacomo & Beccarello, Massimo, 2024. "Designing New Energy Markets to Promote Renewables," MPRA Paper 121783, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Dagoumas, Athanasios S., 2018. "Incorporating unit commitment aspects to the European electricity markets algorithm: An optimization model for the joint clearing of energy and reserve markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 235-258.
    13. Nikolaos Koltsaklis & Athanasios Dagoumas, 2018. "Policy Implications of Power Exchanges on Operational Scheduling: Evaluating EUPHEMIA’s Market Products in Case of Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    14. Fraunholz, Christoph & Kraft, Emil & Keles, Dogan & Fichtner, Wolf, 2021. "Advanced price forecasting in agent-based electricity market simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    15. Michele Fiorelli & Dogan Keles & Francesco Montana & Giovanni Lorenzo Restifo & Eleonora Riva Sanseverino & Gaetano Zizzo, 2020. "Evaluation of the Administrative Phase-Out of Coal Power Plants on the Italian Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L. & Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Tsialis, Panagiotis & Ioannou, Konstantinos, 2018. "Electricity consumption and RES plants in Greece: Typologies of regional units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 134-144.
    17. Newbery, David M. & Greve, Thomas, 2017. "The strategic robustness of oligopoly electricity market models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 124-132.
    18. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Kandpal, Bakul & Pareek, Parikshit & Verma, Ashu, 2022. "A robust day-ahead scheduling strategy for EV charging stations in unbalanced distribution grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    20. Bowei Guo & Giorgio Castagneto Gissey, 2019. "Cost Pass-through in the British Wholesale Electricity Market: Implications of Brexit and the ETS reform," Working Papers EPRG1937, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:136:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519306421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.