IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i8p1945-d160135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Baltic Power Systems’ Integration into the EU Market Coupling under Different Desynchronization Schemes: A Comparative Market Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ettore Bompard

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)

  • Shaghayegh Zalzar

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)

  • Tao Huang

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy)

  • Arturs Purvins

    (European Commission, JRC—Directorate C Energy, Transport and Climate, Petten 1755ZG, The Netherlands)

  • Marcelo Masera

    (European Commission, JRC—Directorate C Energy, Transport and Climate, Petten 1755ZG, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Currently, the power transmission system of the Baltic states is synchronized with the Integrated/Unified Power System (IPS/UPS), which includes the Russian grid, and the IPS/UPS provides frequency regulation and system security within the Baltic states. Since joining the European Union (EU) in 2004, the Baltic states have been following the EU’s energy policy targets. The Baltics are presently participating in a European electricity market, i.e., the NordPool market, while they are expected to join the pan-European electricity market—the European target model for power market integration. Moreover, from a power grid perspective, EU energy policies intend to desynchronize the power grid of the Baltic states from the IPS/UPS over the coming years. This paper evaluates these policy trends through market impacts, and it complements existing studies on Baltic-IPS/UPS desynchronization in terms of wholesale electricity prices, generation surpluses, primary reserve adequacy, and redispatch costs. Participation of the Baltic states in the integrated pan-European day-ahead electricity market with zonal pricing was modeled for 2030, followed by a national redispatch, with detailed power grid modeling of Baltic states to solve potential intrazonal congestion. The simulation results imply the superiority of the Baltics’ synchronization to continental Europe, compared to the other schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ettore Bompard & Shaghayegh Zalzar & Tao Huang & Arturs Purvins & Marcelo Masera, 2018. "Baltic Power Systems’ Integration into the EU Market Coupling under Different Desynchronization Schemes: A Comparative Market Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:1945-:d:160135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/1945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/1945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saskia Ellenbeck & Andreas Beneking & Andrzej Ceglarz & Peter Schmidt & Antonella Battaglini, 2015. "Security of Supply in European Electricity Markets—Determinants of Investment Decisions and the European Energy Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Marta Poncela & Arturs Purvins & Stamatios Chondrogiannis, 2018. "Pan-European Analysis on Power System Flexibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Gribkovskaia, Victoria, 2014. "A Nodal Pricing Model for the Nordic Electricity Market," Discussion Papers 2014/43, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    4. Newbery, David & Strbac, Goran & Viehoff, Ivan, 2016. "The benefits of integrating European electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 253-263.
    5. OGGIONI, Giorgia & SMEERS, Yves, 2013. "Market failures of market coupling and counter-trading in Europe: an illustrative model based discussion," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2553, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Ignacio Aravena & Anthony Papavasiliou, 2017. "Renewable energy integration in zonal markets," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2932, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Mateo Beus & Ivan Pavić & Ivona Štritof & Tomislav Capuder & Hrvoje Pandžić, 2018. "Electricity Market Design in Croatia within the European Electricity Market—Recommendations for Further Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Staffell, Iain & Pfenninger, Stefan, 2016. "Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1224-1239.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Backer, Martijn & Keles, Dogan & Kraft, Emil, 2023. "The economic impacts of integrating European balancing markets: The case of the newly installed aFRR energy market-coupling platform PICASSO," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Changgi Min, 2020. "Impact Analysis of Transmission Congestion on Power System Flexibility in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-11, May.
    3. Karolis Andriuškevičius & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2022. "Energy M&A Market in the Baltic States Analyzed through the Lens of Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Zalzar, Shaghayegh & Bompard, Ettore & Purvins, Arturs & Masera, Marcelo, 2020. "The impacts of an integrated European adjustment market for electricity under high share of renewables," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Alberto Orgaz & Antonio Bello & Javier Reneses, 2019. "A New Model to Simulate Local Market Power in a Multi-Area Electricity Market: Application to the European Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Mauro Caprabianca & Maria Carmen Falvo & Lorenzo Papi & Lucrezia Promutico & Viviana Rossetti & Federico Quaglia, 2020. "Replacement Reserve for the Italian Power System and Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Rud, Linda & Alangi, Somayeh Rahimi, 2017. "Market Power Under Nodal and Zonal Congestion Management Techniques," Discussion Papers 2017/14, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    2. Despoina I. Makrygiorgou & Nikos Andriopoulos & Ioannis Georgantas & Christos Dikaiakos & George P. Papaioannou, 2020. "Cross-Border Electricity Trading in Southeast Europe Towards an Internal European Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Ioannidis, Filippos & Kosmidou, Kyriaki & Makridou, Georgia & Andriosopoulos, Kostas, 2019. "Market design of an energy exchange: The case of Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Zorana Božić & Dušan Dobromirov & Jovana Arsić & Mladen Radišić & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2020. "Power Exchange Prices: Comparison of Volatility in European Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Geske, Joachim & Green, Richard & Staffell, Iain, 2020. "Elecxit: The cost of bilaterally uncoupling British-EU electricity trade," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Nikolaos Koltsaklis & Athanasios Dagoumas, 2018. "Policy Implications of Power Exchanges on Operational Scheduling: Evaluating EUPHEMIA’s Market Products in Case of Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Yue Pu & Yunting Li & Yingzi Wang, 2021. "Structure Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cross-Border Electricity Trade: A Complex Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Cai, Hong & Panos, Evangelos, 2018. "Hybrid pricing in a coupled European power market with more wind power," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 919-931.
    9. Lang, Lukas Maximilian & Dallinger, Bettina & Lettner, Georg, 2020. "The meaning of flow-based market coupling on redispatch measures in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. de Guibert, Paul & Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2020. "Variable time-step: A method for improving computational tractability for energy system models with long-term storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    11. Marko Hočevar & Lovrenc Novak & Primož Drešar & Gašper Rak, 2022. "The Status Quo and Future of Hydropower in Slovenia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Guo, Bowei & Newbery, David, 2021. "The cost of uncoupling GB interconnectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L. & Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Tsialis, Panagiotis & Ioannou, Konstantinos, 2018. "Electricity consumption and RES plants in Greece: Typologies of regional units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 134-144.
    14. Lukas Kriechbaum & Philipp Gradl & Romeo Reichenhauser & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Modelling Grid Constraints in a Multi-Energy Municipal Energy System Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    15. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Newbery, David M. & Greve, Thomas, 2017. "The strategic robustness of oligopoly electricity market models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 124-132.
    17. Behrang Shirizadeh, Quentin Perrier, and Philippe Quirion, 2022. "How Sensitive are Optimal Fully Renewable Power Systems to Technology Cost Uncertainty?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    18. Omoyele, Olalekan & Hoffmann, Maximilian & Koivisto, Matti & Larrañeta, Miguel & Weinand, Jann Michael & Linßen, Jochen & Stolten, Detlef, 2024. "Increasing the resolution of solar and wind time series for energy system modeling: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    19. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    20. Bowei Guo & Giorgio Castagneto Gissey, 2019. "Cost Pass-through in the British Wholesale Electricity Market: Implications of Brexit and the ETS reform," Working Papers EPRG1937, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:1945-:d:160135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.