IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v131y2019icp332-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural gas as a ship fuel: Assessment of greenhouse gas and air pollutant reduction potential

Author

Listed:
  • Sharafian, Amir
  • Blomerus, Paul
  • Mérida, Walter

Abstract

Shipping is a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollutant emissions. This study uses a life cycle assessment to compare emissions from domestic and imported liquefied natural gas (LNG), and heavy-fuel oil (HFO) for marine shipping. The findings show that only high-pressure dual-fuel (HPDF) engines robustly reduce well-to-wake GHG emissions by 10% compared with their HFO-fuelled counterparts. This engine technology is only available for large low-speed engines used in ocean-going vessels (OGVs). For smaller vessels, such as ferries, the current deployment of medium speed low-pressure dual-fuel (MS-LPDF) and lean burn spark ignition (LBSI) gas engines cannot reliably reduce GHG emissions. This is primarily due to the high levels of methane slip from these engines. For air pollution reduction, gas engines are found to be an effective means of reducing nitrogen oxides, sulphur oxides and, particulate matter without any additional engine aftertreatment. The HPDF engines, however, need aftertreatment or exhaust gas recirculation to meet the International Maritime Organization Tier III regulations. Sulphur controls, such as the 2020 act, move to limit sulphur to 0.5% globally. However, this will increase the cost of the HFO used by most OGVs, enhancing the economic case for natural gas fuel.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharafian, Amir & Blomerus, Paul & Mérida, Walter, 2019. "Natural gas as a ship fuel: Assessment of greenhouse gas and air pollutant reduction potential," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 332-346.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:332-346
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421519303118
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernández, Ignacio Arias & Gómez, Manuel Romero & Gómez, Javier Romero & Insua, Álvaro Baaliña, 2017. "Review of propulsion systems on LNG carriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1395-1411.
    2. Armellini, A. & Daniotti, S. & Pinamonti, P. & Reini, M., 2018. "Evaluation of gas turbines as alternative energy production systems for a large cruise ship to meet new maritime regulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 306-317.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jang, Hayoung & Jeong, Byongug & Zhou, Peilin & Ha, Seungman & Nam, Dong, 2021. "Demystifying the lifecycle environmental benefits and harms of LNG as marine fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Wang, Xueyang & Sun, Xiumei & Ahmad, Mahmood & Zhang, Haotian, 2023. "Does low carbon energy transition impede air pollution? Evidence from China's coal-to-gas policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Trivyza, Nikoletta L. & Rentizelas, Athanasios & Theotokatos, Gerasimos & Boulougouris, Evangelos, 2022. "Decision support methods for sustainable ship energy systems: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    4. Perčić, Maja & Vladimir, Nikola & Fan, Ailong, 2020. "Life-cycle cost assessment of alternative marine fuels to reduce the carbon footprint in short-sea shipping: A case study of Croatia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    5. Kim, Jun-Soo & Choi, Jae-Hyuk, 2023. "Feasibility study on bio-heavy fuel as an alternative for marine fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    6. Wu, Jie & Liu, Jiaguo & Li, Na, 2024. "The evasion strategy options for competitive ocean carriers under the EU ETS," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Perčić, Maja & Frković, Lovro & Pukšec, Tomislav & Ćosić, Boris & Li, Oi Lun & Vladimir, Nikola, 2022. "Life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost assessment of power batteries for all-electric vessels for short-sea navigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    8. Fan, Ailong & Wang, Junteng & He, Yapeng & Perčić, Maja & Vladimir, Nikola & Yang, Liu, 2021. "Decarbonising inland ship power system: Alternative solution and assessment method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    9. Yifan Wang & Laurence A. Wright, 2021. "A Comparative Review of Alternative Fuels for the Maritime Sector: Economic, Technology, and Policy Challenges for Clean Energy Implementation," World, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-26, October.
    10. Elizabeth Lindstad & Gunnar S. Eskeland & Agathe Rialland & Anders Valland, 2020. "Decarbonizing Maritime Transport: The Importance of Engine Technology and Regulations for LNG to Serve as a Transition Fuel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Xie, Cheng & Huang, Liwen & Wang, Rui & Deng, Jian & Shu, Yaqing & Jiang, Dan, 2022. "Research on quantitative risk assessment of fuel leak of LNG-fuelled ship during lock transition process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    12. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Park, Chybyung & Jeong, Byongug & Zhou, Peilin, 2022. "Lifecycle energy solution of the electric propulsion ship with Live-Life cycle assessment for clean maritime economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Hyunjun & Lee, Sanghuk & Jeong, Jinyeong & Chang, Daejun, 2018. "Design of the compressor-assisted LNG fuel gas supply system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1017-1027.
    2. Yu, Taejong & Kim, Donghoi & Gundersen, Truls & Lim, Youngsub, 2023. "A feasibility study of HFO refrigerants for onboard BOG liquefaction processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Xie, Peilin & Tan, Sen & Bazmohammadi, Najmeh & Guerrero, Josep. M. & Vasquez, Juan. C. & Alcala, Jose Matas & Carreño, Jorge El Mariachet, 2022. "A distributed real-time power management scheme for shipboard zonal multi-microgrid system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    4. Bolbot, Victor & Trivyza, Nikoletta L. & Theotokatos, Gerasimos & Boulougouris, Evangelos & Rentizelas, Athanasios & Vassalos, Dracos, 2020. "Cruise ships power plant optimisation and comparative analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Zhen, Lu & Wu, Yiwei & Wang, Shuaian & Laporte, Gilbert, 2020. "Green technology adoption for fleet deployment in a shipping network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 388-410.
    6. Lee, Jaejun & Son, Heechang & Yu, Taejong & Oh, Juyoung & Park, Min Gyun & Lim, Youngsub, 2023. "Process design of advanced LNG subcooling system combined with a mixed refrigerant cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    7. Kim, Donghoi & Hwang, Chulmin & Gundersen, Truls & Lim, Youngsub, 2019. "Process design and economic optimization of boil-off-gas re-liquefaction systems for LNG carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 1119-1129.
    8. Trivyza, Nikoletta L. & Rentizelas, Athanasios & Theotokatos, Gerasimos & Boulougouris, Evangelos, 2022. "Decision support methods for sustainable ship energy systems: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    9. Barone, G. & Buonomano, A. & Forzano, C. & Palombo, A., 2021. "Implementing the dynamic simulation approach for the design and optimization of ships energy systems: Methodology and applicability to modern cruise ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Abdulaziz M. T. Alzayedi & Abdullah N. F. N. R. Alkhaledi & Suresh Sampath & Pericles Pilidis, 2023. "TERA of Gas Turbine Propulsion Systems for RORO Ships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Yin, L. & Ju, Y.L., 2019. "Comparison and analysis of two nitrogen expansion cycles for BOG Re-liquefaction systems for small LNG ships," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 769-776.
    12. I. Mallidis & S. Despoudi & R. Dekker & E. Iakovou & D. Vlachos, 2020. "The impact of sulphur limit fuel regulations on maritime supply chain network design," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 677-695, November.
    13. Zhu, Sipeng & Zhang, Kun & Deng, Kangyao, 2020. "A review of waste heat recovery from the marine engine with highly efficient bottoming power cycles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Paweł Niszczota & Maciej Chmielewski & Marian Gieras, 2022. "Fuel-Water Emulsion as an Alternative Fuel for Gas Turbines in the Context of Combustion Process Properties—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Jiang, Yuemao & Wang, Shunsen & Wang, Zhe & Su, Wen, 2024. "Performance enhancement of gas turbine by supercritical CO2 cycle construction: System and component two-level evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    16. Pospíšil, Jiří & Charvát, Pavel & Arsenyeva, Olga & Klimeš, Lubomír & Špiláček, Michal & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2019. "Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-15.
    17. Jang, Hayoung & Jeong, Byongug & Zhou, Peilin & Ha, Seungman & Nam, Dong, 2021. "Demystifying the lifecycle environmental benefits and harms of LNG as marine fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    18. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Park, Chybyung & Jeong, Byongug & Zhou, Peilin, 2022. "Lifecycle energy solution of the electric propulsion ship with Live-Life cycle assessment for clean maritime economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    20. Soon-Kyu Hwang & Byung-Gun Jung, 2021. "A Novel Control Strategy on Stable Operation of Fuel Gas Supply System and Re-Liquefaction System for LNG Carriers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:131:y:2019:i:c:p:332-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.