IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v121y2018icp92-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on probabilistic social cost–benefit analysis to introduce high-efficiency motors into subway station ventilation

Author

Listed:
  • Quan, Junlong
  • Kim, Se-Heon
  • Kim, Ju-Hyung

Abstract

As a solution to enhance the air quality for public health while reducing energy consumption, introduction of high efficiency motors with inverters enabling variable speed operation of subway station ventilation systems has been proposed. However, as the initial costs for these alternative systems are around eight times more than those for conventional fixed speed systems, a comprehensive feasibility analysis should be conducted. Previous analyses focused on economic benefits based on predetermined loads for ventilation. As such, the various social benefits that are dynamically determined according to energy saving resulting from variable speed operation could not be determined. This research presents a probabilistic social cost-benefit analysis model. The ventilation systems’ operational loads are mainly affected by particulate matter concentrations; these can be predicted through probabilistic simulation of previous weather data. The probabilistically analyzed energy saving influences the social benefits i.e. fuel reduction, carbon dioxide reduction, and air pollutant reduction. The proposed analysis model is validated with real world data obtained from the operation of underground subway station ventilation systems in which synchronous reluctance motors (SynRM), a type of high efficiency variable speed motor, and inverters are installed by the authors.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan, Junlong & Kim, Se-Heon & Kim, Ju-Hyung, 2018. "A study on probabilistic social cost–benefit analysis to introduce high-efficiency motors into subway station ventilation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 92-100.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:121:y:2018:i:c:p:92-100
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151830394X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sidhu, Arjan S. & Pollitt, Michael G. & Anaya, Karim L., 2018. "A social cost benefit analysis of grid-scale electrical energy storage projects: A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 881-894.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karali, Nihan & Shah, Nihar & Park, Won Young & Khanna, Nina & Ding, Chao & Lin, Jiang & Zhou, Nan, 2020. "Improving the energy efficiency of room air conditioners in China: Costs and benefits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico & Accordini, Davide, 2019. "Energy efficiency measures in electric motors systems: A novel classification highlighting specific implications in their adoption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lechón, Y. & de la Rúa, C. & Rodríguez, I. & Caldés, N., 2019. "Socioeconomic implications of biofuels deployment through an Input-Output approach. A case study in Uruguay," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 178-191.
    2. Sulaiman A. Almohaimeed & Siddharth Suryanarayanan & Peter O’Neill, 2021. "Simulation Studies to Quantify the Impact of Demand Side Management on Environmental Footprint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Biancardi, Andrea & Mendes, Carla & Staffell, Iain, 2024. "Battery electricity storage as both a complement and substitute for cross-border interconnection," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Oh, Eunsung & Son, Sung-Yong, 2020. "Theoretical energy storage system sizing method and performance analysis for wind power forecast uncertainty management," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1060-1069.
    5. Ivan Pavić & Zora Luburić & Hrvoje Pandžić & Tomislav Capuder & Ivan Andročec, 2019. "Defining and Evaluating Use Cases for Battery Energy Storage Investments: Case Study in Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Huijia Yang & Weiguang Fan & Guangyu Qin & Zhenyu Zhao, 2021. "A Fuzzy-ANP Approach for Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Grid-Side Commercial Storage Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2022. "A social cost benefit analysis for the procurement of reactive power: The case of Power Potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    8. Ding, Jie & Xu, Yujie & Chen, Haisheng & Sun, Wenwen & Hu, Shan & Sun, Shuang, 2019. "Value and economic estimation model for grid-scale energy storage in monopoly power markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 986-1002.
    9. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2019. "Storage Business Models: Lessons for Electricity from Cloud Data, Frozen Food and Natural Gas," The Energy Journal, , vol. 40(1_suppl), pages 409-432, June.
    10. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2018. "Storage Business Models: Lessons for Electricity from Natural Gas, Cloud Data and Frozen Food," Working Papers EPRG 1804, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    11. Ambrosio-Albala, P. & Upham, P. & Bale, C.S.E. & Taylor, P.G., 2020. "Exploring acceptance of decentralised energy storage at household and neighbourhood scales: A UK survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Shan, Rui & Abdulla, Ahmed & Li, Mingquan, 2021. "Deleterious effects of strategic, profit-seeking energy storage operation on electric power system costs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    13. Forero-Quintero, Jose-Fernando & Villafáfila-Robles, Roberto & Barja-Martinez, Sara & Munné-Collado, Ingrid & Olivella-Rosell, Pol & Montesinos-Miracle, Daniel, 2022. "Profitability analysis on demand-side flexibility: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Das, Choton K. & Bass, Octavian & Kothapalli, Ganesh & Mahmoud, Thair S. & Habibi, Daryoush, 2018. "Optimal placement of distributed energy storage systems in distribution networks using artificial bee colony algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 212-228.
    15. Ren, Hongbo & Wu, Qiong & Zhu, Qunzhi & Gao, Weijun, 2019. "Cost–benefit analysis of distributed energy systems considering multi-benefits and multi-stakeholders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    16. Maximilian Parzen & Fabian Neumann & Addrian H. Van Der Weijde & Daniel Friedrich & Aristides Kiprakis, 2021. "Beyond cost reduction: Improving the value of energy storage in electricity systems," Papers 2101.10092, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    17. Trivedi, Anupam & Chong Aih, Hau & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2020. "A stochastic cost–benefit analysis framework for allocating energy storage system in distribution network for load leveling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    18. Charalampos Papadopoulos & Athanasios Bachoumis & Niki Skopetou & Costas Mylonas & Nikolaos Tagkoulis & Petros Iliadis & Ioannis Mamounakis & Nikolaos Nikolopoulos, 2023. "Integrated Methodology for Community-Oriented Energy Investments: Architecture, Implementation, and Assessment for the Case of Nisyros Island," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Lei Zhang & Yingqi Liu & Beibei Pang & Bingxiang Sun & Ari Kokko, 2020. "Second Use Value of China’s New Energy Vehicle Battery: A View Based on Multi-Scenario Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Karim Anaya & Michael Pollitt, 2021. "An evaluation of a local reactive power market: the case of Power Potential," Working Papers EPRG2124, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:121:y:2018:i:c:p:92-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.