IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v134y2024ics0140988324003013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploiting the sentiments: A simple approach for improving cross hedging effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Pan, Zhiyuan
  • Fu, Ziqian
  • Wang, Yudong
  • Dong, Qingma

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel hedging strategy based on textual information for cross-hedging. The strategy allows the optimal hedge ratio to vary with the sentiment extracted from online oil news, leading to an improvement in cross-hedging effectiveness. We find that the sentiment hedging strategy outperforms traditional time-varying and static hedging strategies in both in-sample and out-of-sample scenarios, with statistical and economic significance. This superior performance benefits from the well-documented predictive power of sentiment on futures volatility. Furthermore, we confirm an asymmetric effect of sentiment on hedging effectiveness, with negative sentiment having a greater impact on hedge ratios. Finally, extreme sentiment can trade off the negative relationship between volatile hedge ratios and hedging performance, potentially leading to superior hedging performance compared to normal sentiment, which is robust when considering transaction costs. Our findings highlight the importance of sentiment for estimating the optimal hedge ratio and should be considered for risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan, Zhiyuan & Fu, Ziqian & Wang, Yudong & Dong, Qingma, 2024. "Exploiting the sentiments: A simple approach for improving cross hedging effectiveness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324003013
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324003013
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    News sentiment; Cross hedge; Topic model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324003013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.